• Title/Summary/Keyword: $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Liquid-Based Cytology Using $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ System in Cervicovaginal Cytology: Comparative Study with Conventional Pap Smear and Histology (고식적 직접 도말법과 $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system 법에 의한 자궁경부질 세포검사 성적의 비교 검토)

  • Jeon, Yoon-Kyung;Kim, Ok-Ran;Park, Ki-Wha;Kang, Soon-Beom;Park, In-Ae
    • The Korean Journal of Cytopathology
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-39
    • /
    • 2004
  • We compared the diagnostic accuracy of liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology using $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system (Monogen, Herndon, Virginia, USA), a manual system based on membrane filtration method, with conventional Pap smear. Study population included 92 patients visiting the gynecologic department under the suspicion of uterine cervical disease. In thirty of them, surgical biopsy was performed. $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system provided well-preserved monolayer specimen with good nuclear morphology. However, about 19% of specimens were inadequate to interpret due to low cellularity. The detection rate of abnormal cells more than ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of unknown significance) was 23.9% and higher than 19.4 % of conventional Pap smear. Diagnostic concordance rate with conventional Pap smear was 81%, and severe discordance rate influencing on the management of patient was 7.6 %. Among these seven cases, $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system was more diagnostic only in four. In comparison with histology, the sensitivity of diagnosis of $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system was 78.9% and slightly higher than 73.5% of conventional Pap smear. However, the specificity was 81.1% and lower than 90.9% of Pap smear. In conclusion, $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system provided diagnostic accuracies similar to the conventional Pap smear. The inexpertness of slide preparation and the low cellularity were considered to endow a limitation in more accurate evaluation.

Utility of Bile Duct Brush Cytology in Pancreaticobiliary Diseases - Prospective Comparative Study of Conventional Smear and $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ Liquid Based Cytology - (췌담관질환에서 담관 솔질세포검사의 유용성 - 통상도말과 $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ 액상세포검사의 전향적 비교연구 -)

  • Lee, Dong-Wha;Kim, Mee-Sun;Cho, Young-Deok;Cheon, Young-Koog;Choi, Min-Sung;Kim, Dong-Won;Jin, So-Young
    • The Korean Journal of Cytopathology
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.38-45
    • /
    • 2006
  • Bile duct brush cytology has been employed as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary tract strictures. The specificity of this method is high however, its sensitivity is quite low. A recent study employing liquid based cytology (LBC) reported results comparable to those achieved via conventional cytology. Therefore, we have attempted to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic utility of bile duct brush cytology in pancreaticobiliary diseases. A total of 46 cases with bile duct stricture were enrolled including 11 cases of benign stricture, 29 cases of bile duct carcinoma, 3 cases of gallbladder cancer, and 3 cases of pancreatic cancer. Both conventional smear and LBC using $MonoPrep2^{TM}$ system were conducted in each case. The cytological diagnosis of each case was classed into the following categories; benign, suspicious for malignancy, and malignancy. The diagnostic accuracy of both cytologic methods was investigated. LBC evidenced a high rate of material insufficiency (13/46), which was attributed to low cellularity. The kappa index of both cytological methods was 0.508. Cytological and tissue diagnoses were correlated in 25 cases conducted from biopsy or operation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 41.2% (7/17), 100% (8/8), 100% (7/7), and 44.4% (10/18) in conventional smear; 58.8% (10/17), 87.5% (7/8), 90.9% (10/11), and 50.0% (7/14) in LBC; and 94.1% (16/17), 87.5% (7/8), 94.1% (16/17), and 87.5% (7/8) in any one of both cytological methods, respectively. Based on these results, the sensitivity of LBC was found to be superior to that of conventional smear and we were able to obtain higher positive predictive value upto 94.1% by simultaneously conducting both cytologic methods.