• 제목/요약/키워드: $C^2-continuity$

검색결과 102건 처리시간 0.017초

초·중등 발명·지식재산 교육과정의 적정 편성 방안 연구 (An Analysis of Proper Curriculum Organization Plan for Elementary and Secondary Invention/Intellectual Property Education)

  • 이규녀;이병욱
    • 대한공업교육학회지
    • /
    • 제42권1호
    • /
    • pp.106-124
    • /
    • 2017
  • 이 연구는 초 중등 발명 지식재산교육의 목표 및 교육과정에 대한 적정 편성 방안을 도출하기 위하여 전문가 대상으로 2차 델파이 조사를 실시하였다. 이를 통한 연구의 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 이 연구에서 제안한 학교급별 발명 지식재산교육의 핵심 목적은 타당한 것으로 나타났다. 핵심 목적은 초등학교가 '발명 인식과 태도 함양'(M=4.5), 중학교가 '발명 과정과 기법 이해'(M=4.2), 일반계고가 '발명 기법 적용 및 평가'(M=4.1), 특성화고가 '직무 발명 이해와 적용'(M=4.6)으로 나타났다. 학교급별 교육목적 및 목표도 타당한 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 이 연구에서 제안한 초 중등 발명 지식재산교육의 핵심 학습요소에 대한 적정 편성 방안은 선행문헌의 편성 실태와 대동소이하게 나타났으나, 학교급별 발명 지식재산교육의 목적 및 목표에 따른 각 학습요소의 편성 비중은 전반적인 개선이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 초등학교와 중학교의 경우 발명의 기본적인 학습요소(발명의 이해(A), 창의성 이해와 활동(B), 문제 인식과 활동(C), 문제해결과 활동(D), 발명 융합 지식(E), 발명 기법과 실제(F))에 집중하여 편성하고(73.2%, 65.1%), 고등학교는 초 중학교에서 집중했던 기본 학습요소의 비중을 낮추며(51.0%) 발명과 진로(H), 특허 출원(K) 등 발명과 연계되어 확장된 학습요소들의 비중을 높여 편성하는 것이 적정한 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 초 중등 발명 지식재산교육 체계는 학교급별 발명 지식재산교육의 목적 및 목표를 지향점으로 설정하고, 이를 달성하기 위해 핵심 학습요소는 계속성, 계열성, 통합성 등 타일러(Tyler)의 학습조직 원리에 근거하여 학교급별로 적정 편성 방안을 구축해야 한다. 특히 특성화고는 초 중학교뿐만 아니라 일반계고와의 차별화가 필요하며 직무 발명 이해와 적용을 위한 중등 단계 직업교육에서의 발명 지식재산교육체계 구축이 필요하다.

한.미 간호 교육과정의 비교 연구 -간호대학과정을 중심으로- (A Comparative Study on the Curriculum of Nursing Education in America and Korea)

  • 김정자
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제7권2호
    • /
    • pp.60-82
    • /
    • 1977
  • The purpose of this study is first, to analyse the present nursing education and the curriculum in Korea in view of the changes and the new tendency of nursing education and second, to compare our curriculum with that of America, where nursing activities are actively earring on and, third, to try to find out what we should reconsider and improve in our nursing education. The object of this study is the educational program and the curriculum from 1973 to 1976 by selecting each five from colleges and department of nursing in Korea and America. The results of the study were as fellows : . 1. The aim of nursing education puts impassion the role of leader, knowledge and technology of nursing, welfare of society and service of community in both the America and Korea. In Korea nursing is mainly restricted to the treatment of diseases, while in the America the items of the aim of nursing are mainly extended to the capacity for Self- realization of nurse, in Korea they are restricted to the treatment of diseases. 2. In Korea the rate of credit of the curriculum of nursing education is the highest in professional education, next in general education, next in supporting science and educational subject, while in America the rate of the credit is the highest in general education, next professional education and then supporting Science and educational subject isn′t included in the curriculum. 3. In both Korea and America the role of the animal credit allotment in general education, is the highest in the first year and the rate in supporting science is the highest in the second year. In Korea professional subjects are concentrated in the third year while in America there is a tendency that they are increasing in number in the grade order. 4. There is a tendency that the rate of the credit allotment of the main professional subjects in curriculum is higher in Korea than in America : that is, in Korea the rate of the allotment of the credit is the highest in medical - surgical nursing, next maternal - child nursing, next community - health nursing and the psychiatric nursing and there in a great difference in the rate of the allotment of each credit. While in America the rate of the allotment of the credit is the highest in community - health nursing, next in medical- surgical nursing, next in maternal - child nursing, and then in psychiatric nursing and there is little difference in the rate of tile allotment of each credit. 5. From general education, supporting science and professional education, they have considered the continuity and sequence in the structure of nursing curriculum of Korea and America. While in Korea we have partly made integration in tile content of the subjects. Most of the school in America, they have made integration in the content of subjects especially in all subjects, but in Korea we haven't made it in all subjects. 6. In the system and form of nursing education Problem solving method, Dialectical method and operational method are introduced in some America schools and in others there is a tendency that the whole nursing education has the system based on Preventive frame - work or Health -illness frame work ; while only one college has an attempt for Health - Illness continue in Korea. 7. In Korea nursing education, as the importance of health- nursing and team nursing, the aim which is also comparatively emphasized is about health management and service of collective community. The subject pertaining to the aim is the studies of community health nursing, which are more in number in America. 8. When we consider the association between the social, general aims ?f the nursing education and the formation of the curriculum in Korean nursing school the courses of study concerning "the role of leadership and cooperative personal relation": "nursing care for the group": dynamic nursing care": and "the system of the public health nursing associated with the understanding of the regional community" are insufficient as compared with those of America. Especially, the lack of the behavioral science including the nursing care connected with the care for the group, the basic science on the clinical and developmental psychology, anthropology in known to be a prominent issue.

  • PDF