Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/aas.2017.4.3.219

Application of aerospace structural models to marine engineering  

Pagani, A. (MUL2 Group, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino)
Carrera, E. (MUL2 Group, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino)
Jamshed, R. (MUL2 Group, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino)
Publication Information
Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science / v.4, no.3, 2017 , pp. 219-235 More about this Journal
Abstract
The large container ships and fast patrol boats are complex marine structures. Therefore, their global mechanical behaviour has long been modeled mostly by refined beam theories. Important issues of cross section warping and bending-torsion coupling have been addressed by introducing special functions in these theories with inherent assumptions and thus compromising their robustness. The 3D solid Finite Element (FE) models, on the other hand, are accurate enough but pose high computational cost. In this work, different marine vessel structures have been analysed using the well-known Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF). According to CUF, the governing equations (and consequently the finite element arrays) are written in terms of fundamental nuclei that do not depend on the problem characteristics and the approximation order. Thus, refined models can be developed in an automatic manner. In the present work, a particular class of 1D CUF models that was initially devised for the analysis of aircraft structures has been employed for the analysis of marine structures. This class, which was called Component-Wise (CW), allows one to model complex 3D features, such as inclined hull walls, floors and girders in the form of components. Realistic ship geometries were used to demonstrate the efficacy of the CUF approach. With the same level of accuracy achieved, 1D CUF beam elements require far less number of Degrees of Freedom (DoFs) compared to a 3D solid FE solution.
Keywords
hull structures; refined beam theories; unified formulation; component-wise models;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Carrera, E. and Giunta, G. (2010), "Refined beam theories based on a unified formulation", Int'l J. Appl. Mech., 2(1), 117-143.   DOI
2 Carrera, E., Giunta, G., Nali, P. and Petrolo, M. (2010), "Refined beam elements with arbitrary cross-section geometries", Comput. Struct., 88(5-6), 283-293.   DOI
3 Carrera, E., Giunta, G. and Petrolo, M. (2011), Beam Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories, John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781119978565.
4 Carrera, E. and Pagani, A. (2014), "Free vibration analysis of civil engineering structures by component-wise models", J. Sound Vib., 333(19), 4597-4620.   DOI
5 Carrera, E., Pagani, A. and Jamshed, J. (2016), "Refined beam finite elements for static and dynamic analysis of hull structures", Comput. Struct., 167, 37-49.   DOI
6 Carrera, E., Pagani, A. and Jamshed, R. (2015), "Refined beam finite element to analyse hull structures", Proceedings of the International Conference on Lightweight Design of Marine Structures (LIMAS-2015), Glasgow, UK, November.
7 Carrera, E., Pagani, A. and Petrolo, M. (2013), "Classical, refined, and component-wise analysis of reinforcedshell wing structures", AIAA J., 51(5), 1255-1268.   DOI
8 Carrera, E., Pagani, A. and Petrolo, M. (2013), "Component-wise method applied to vibration of wing structures", J. Appl. Mech., 80(4), 1-15.
9 Carrera, E. and Petrolo, M. (2012), "Refined beam elements with only displacement variables and plate/shell capabilities", Meccanica, 47(3), 537-556.   DOI
10 Carrera, E. and Zappino, E. (2016), "Carrera unified formulation for free-vibration analysis of aircraft structures", AIAA J., 54(1), 280-292.   DOI
11 Euler, L. (1744), De curvis elasticis, Lausanne and Geneva: Bousquet.
12 Jensen, J.J. (2001), Load and Global Response of Ships, Elsevier.
13 Jensen, J.J. and Madsen, H.F. (1977), "A review of ship hull vibration", Shock Vib. Digest, 9(7).
14 Pedersen, P. (1985), "Torsional response of container ships", J. Ship Res., 29, 194-205.
15 Kawai, T. (1973), "The application of finite element methods to ship structures", Comput. Struct., 3(5), 117-594.
16 Leibowitz, R. (1961), "A method for prediction of slamming forces and response of a ship hull", David Taylor Model Basin Report, AD-428149.
17 Pedersen, P. (1983), "A beam model for the torsional-bending response of ship hulls", Trans. Roy. Inst. Naval Arch., 125, 171-182.
18 Pedersen, P. (1991), "Beam theories for torsional-bending response of ship hulls", J. Ship Res., 35(3), 254-265.
19 Pittaluga, A. (1978), "Recent developments in the theory of thin-walled beams", Comput. Struct., 9(1), 69-79.   DOI
20 Senjanovic, I. and Fann, Y. (1992), "A higher-order theory of thin-walled girders with application to ship structures", Comput. Struct., 43(1), 31-52.   DOI
21 Senjanovic, I. and Grubusic, R. (1991), "Coupled horizontal and torsional vibration of a ship hull with large hatch openings", J. Ship Res., 41(2), 213-226.
22 Shama, M. (2010), Torsion and Stresses in Ships, Springer.
23 Timoshenko, S. P. (1922a), "On the corrections for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars", Philosoph. Magazine, 41(245), 744-746.
24 Timoshenko, S.P. (1922b), "On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross section", Philosoph. Magazine, 43(253), 125-131.
25 Vlasov, V.Z. (1961), Thin-walled elastic beams, National Science Foundation, Washington.
26 Bishop, R.E.D. and Price, W.G. (1979), Hydroelasticity of Ships, Cambridge University Press.
27 Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite Element Procedure, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
28 Bishop, R.E.D. and Price, W.G. (1974), "On modal analysis of ship strength", Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 341(1624), 121-134.   DOI
29 Bishop, R.E.D. and Price, W.G. (1975), "Ship strength as a problem of structural dynamics", The Naval Architect, 2, 61-63.
30 Budynas, W.C.Y.R.G. (2002), Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, McGraw-Hill.
31 Carrera, E., Cinefra, M., Petrolo, M. and Zappino, E. (2014), Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation, John Wiley & Sons.