Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2017.32.6.549

Effects of Coffee Shop Brand Attributes and Price Fairness on the Purchasing Behavior - Focus on the Case of Coffee Shop A -  

Choi, Mi Sun (Department of Foodservice and Culinary management, Kyonggi University)
Jung, Ju Hee (Department of Foodservice and Culinary management, Kyonggi University)
Kim, Ye Young (Department of Foodservice and Culinary management, Kyonggi University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture / v.32, no.6, 2017 , pp. 549-557 More about this Journal
Abstract
As many companies are performing brand management as a marketing strategy to establish long-term relationships with their customers, consumers decide the actual purchasing behavior by understanding the brand attributes of the relevant company based on an evaluation standard of the products. This paper provides the basic data for improving the competitiveness of the coffee shop market continuously, and analyzes the influential relationships between each variable by limiting the brand attributes of the coffee shop and the price fairness factor that would be expected to affect the consumers' purchasing behavior as the cause variables. The results showed that the-out of brand attribute factors of the coffee shop, the brand awareness and perceived quality had significant effects on the price fairness while the influence of the shop image on the price fairness was not verified. In addition, all the brand awareness, shop image, and perceived quality had significant effects on the purchasing behavior while the statistical significance between price fairness and purchasing behavior was verified. The rationality of the price presented by the coffee shop could be judged depending on the quality perceived by the consumers. Similarly, once consumers classified the propriety of price and then perceived that a suitable price had been set up regarding the quality and service provided by the coffee shop, it was highly possible for them to include it in their actual purchasing behavior, despite the higher price than other brands'. Further research on the psychological variables affecting the purchasing behavior by securing more diverse consumers to understand their purchasing behavior for a wide range of research subjects and the generalization of research results, will provide useful data for establishing marketing measures necessary to form strong relationships between consumers and brand in the currently-saturated coffee shop market.
Keywords
Coffee shop brand; brand attributes; price fairness; purchase behavior;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Korea's official statistics. Korea Consumer Agency. 2017. Available from: http://www.kca.go.kr/index.do, [accessed 2017.11.08]
2 Kim HM, Kim HB, Cha SB. 2015. The effect of coffee shop selection choice attributes on customer behavioral intention: Moderating effect of preferred type of coffee shop. International J. Tourism Manag. Sci., 30(2):115-132
3 Kim HS. 2013. The influence on the quality, the customer satisfaction and the preference by the brand image and the perceived price of espresso coffee shop: For undergraduates in Daegu, Gyeongbuk. Master's degree thesis, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea, pp.47-48
4 Kim JS, Choi HR. 2009. The study of the effect of brand awareness level and perceived price level of sport shoes on customers' perception and purchase intention. J. Product Res., 27(1):143-156
5 Kim KY, Go MA, Kim JY. 2014. Effects of food service businesses' service quality on corporate images and purchase intention, International J. Tourism and Hosp. Res., 28(7):209-219
6 Kim YH, Kim MJ, Lee YM, Lee KH. 2007. Effects of multiple country-of-Origin cues and price information on attitude toward the brard and evaluation of jean products. Korean. J. Soc. Clothing and Textiles., 31(4):495-506   DOI
7 Kim YJ. 2015. The influence of brand image on customer satisfaction and revisit intention in coffee shop: Focusing on moderating effects by gender. J. Foodser. Manag., 18(2):239-255
8 Kim YY. 2016. The study on the coffee shop brand extrinsic cues and consumer attitudes. Doctoral degree thesis, Kyonggi University, Korea, pp 1-3
9 Lee AJ, Kim MS. 2011. A study on antecedent factors of coffee shop's price fairness, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. J. Foodser. Manag., 14(5):241-267
10 Lee JW. 2014. The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic cue of wine on perceived quality, attitude, satisfaction and repurchase intention: Case of hotel and restaurant customers. Doctoral degree thesis, Kyunghee University, Korea,, p.10
11 Barry B, Oliver RL. 1996. Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes., 67(2):127-143   DOI
12 Bolton LE, Warlop L, Alba JW. 2003. Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. J. Consumer Res., 29(4):474-491   DOI
13 Cho WC. 2013. Effect of product evaluation on bakery brand extrinsic cue & price fairness. Doctoral degree thesis, Kyonggi University, Korea, pp 67-69
14 Cha SB, kim YG. 2016. An analysis of customer price sensitivity to americano among three franchise coffeehouses using price sensitivity measurement: A case study of Starbucks, Edya and Paik's Coffee. J. Tourism Sci., 40(9):137-150
15 Chaing CF, Jang SC. 2006. The effects of perceived price and brand image on value and purchase intention. J. Hosp. Leisure Marketing, 15(3):49-69   DOI
16 Dodds CC, Lindley T. 2003. Store brand and retail brand differentiation: The influence of store image and store brand attitudes on store own brand perceptions. J. Retailing and Consumer Services., 10(6):345-352   DOI
17 Han DG. 2015, Study on the influence of service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty of the domestic coffee chains. J. Foodserv. Manag., 18(1):189-209
18 Hong CE. 2015. The Effects of Selection Attributes on Customer Satisfaction and Service Loyalty in Coffee Shops?. Tourism Res., 40(2):309-331
19 Keller KL. 2012. Strategic brand management. Pearson FT Prentice Hall Highe, New Jersey, p 2
20 Jeong JY. 2013. Consumer's demographic characteristics and effects of coffee consumption motivation on revisit intention of coffee shop. Korean. J. Data Analysis Soc., 15(5):2871-2888
21 Rahman O. 2011. Understanding consumers' perceptions and behaviors: Implications for Denim Jeans design. J. Textile and Apparel, Technology and Manag., 7(1):1-16
22 Lee JY, Moon SA, Byun KI. 2017. The effect of service quality of coffee shops on customer satisfaction and revisit intentions at high and low price levels: Focusing on coffee customer in Daegu. Korean J. Hosp. Tourism., 26(7):1-19
23 Moon SJ, Song JS. 2014. On the structural relationships between price fairness, brand image, brand trust and brand loyalty of franchise coffee shops: Focusing on the moderating effect of prior knowledge. International J. Tourism Manag. Sci., 29(3):231-254
24 Park KE, Lee EY. 2014. The analysis of customers' price sensitivity of coffee in small-medium coffee house: Focused on take-out coffee house. J. Tourism and Leisure Res., 26(6):339-357
25 Seo YG, Gu IK. 2014. Brand marketing. Hakhyunsa, Korea, pp 4-5
26 Zeithaml VA. 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing., 52(3):2-22   DOI
27 Song JS, Lee JA. 2012. The effect of price fairness on coffee shop image and Purchase Intention. Tourism Res., 35:209-224
28 Vranesevic T, Stancec R. 2003, The effect of the brand on perceived quality of food products. British Food J., 105(11):811-825   DOI
29 Yang JY, Moon SJ. 2015. A study of relationships between brand communication, customer satisfaction and brand loyalty of franchise coffee shops: Focusing on the moderating effect of price fairness. International J. Interpretation and Translation., 40:79-101
30 Korea's official statistics. Korea Consumer Agency. 2015. Available from: http://www.kca.go.kr/index.do, [accessed 2017.10.21]
31 Bae SW. 2011. The effect of extrinsic cues of sporting goods on product evaluation. Doctoral degree thesis, Busan University, Korea, p 2
32 Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1977. Attitude-Behavior relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Res., 84(5):888-918   DOI