1 |
Cardello AV, Schutz HG. 1996. Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation. Food Qual Prefer. 7(3-4): 239-249
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Cho HY, Chung SJ, Kim HS, Kim KO. 2005. Effect of sensory characteristics and non-sensory factors on consumer liking of various canned tea products. J. Food Sci. 70(8):S532-S538
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Freeman RPJ, Booth DA. 2010. Users of 'diet' drinks who think that sweetness is calories. Appetite. 55(1):152-155
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Guinard JX, Souchard A, Picot M, Rogeaux M, Sieffermann JM. 1998. Sensory determinant of the thirst-quenching character of beer. Appetite. 31(1):101-115
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Guinard JX, Uotani B, Schlich P. 2001. Internal and external mapping of preference for commercial lager beers: Comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price. Food Qual Prefer. 12(4):243-255
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Allison RI, Uhl KP. 1964. Influence of beer brand identification on taste perception. J. Marketing Res.1(3): 36-39
DOI
|
7 |
Bower JA, Saadat MA, Whitten C. 2003. Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Qual Prefer. 14(1):65-74
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Helgesen H, Solheim R, Naes T. 1997. Consumer preference mapping of dry fermented lamb sausages for consumer testing. Food Qual Prefer. 8(2):97-109
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Her ES, Lee KH, Bea EY, Lyu ES. 2008. Interrelations among beverage intake, food behavior and personality in adolescents. Korean J. Community Nutr. 13(2):189-198
과학기술학회마을
|
10 |
Kihlberg I, Johansson L, Langsrud O, Risvik E. 2005. Effects of information on liking of bread. Food Qual Prefer. 16(1):25-35
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Kim EM. 2011. Formulation and quality characteristics of noni beverages mixed with red ginseng, rubus coreanus and pomegranate extracts. Korea J. Culinary Res. 17(1):259-269
과학기술학회마을
|
12 |
Kim HK, Jeon SY, Kim KO. 2013. The effects of consumer demographics and brand information on consumer acceptability of commercial beverage products. Food Sci Biotechnol. in press
|
13 |
King SC, Weber AJ, Meiselman HL, Lv N. 2004. The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Qual Prefer. 15(7-8): 645-653
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Labbe D, Gilbert F, Antille N, Martin N. 2009. Sensory determinants of refreshing. Food Qual Prefer. 20(2):100-109
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Lahteenmaki L, Tuorila H. 1997. Item-by-use appropriateness of drinks varying in sweetener and fat content. Food Qual Prefer. 8(2):85-90
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Lange C, Martin C, Chabanet C, Combris P, Issanchou S. 2002. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Qual Prefer. 13(7-8):597-608
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Lee SM, Lee HS, Kim KH, Kim KO. 2009. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of decaffeinated green teas. J. Food Sci. 74(3):S135-S141
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Luckow T, Delahunty CM. 2004. Which juice is 'healthier'? A consumer study of probiotic non-dairy juice drinks. Food Qual Prefer. 15(7-8):751-759
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Mejlholm O, Martens M. 2006. Beer identity in Denmark. Food Qual Prefer. 17(2):108-115
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
McEwan JA, Colwill JS. 1996. The sensory assessment of the thirst-quenching characteristics of drinks. Food Qual Prefer. 7(2):101-111
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Nevid JS. 1981. Effects of brand labeling on ratings of product quality. Percept Motor Skill. 53(2):407-410
DOI
|
22 |
Noussair C, Robin S, Ruffieux B. 2004. Revealing consumers' willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction. J. Econ Psychol. 25(6):725-741
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Raats MM, Shepherd R. 1992. An evaluation of the use and perceived appropriateness of milk using the repertory grid method and the 'item by use' appropriateness method. Food Qual Prefer. 3(2):89-100
|
24 |
Resano H, Sanjuan AI, Albisu LM. 2009. Consumers' acceptability and actual choice. An exploratory research on cured ham in Spain. Food Qual Prefer. 20(5):391-398
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Schutz HG. 1994. Appropriateness as measure of the cognitivecontextual aspects of food acceptance. In MacFie, H. J. H., & Thomson, D. M. H. (Eds.), Measurement of Food Preferences. pp 25-50. Glassgow: Blackie Academic and Professtional
|
26 |
Scriven FM, Gains N, Green SR, Thomson DMH. 1989. A contextual evaluation of alcoholic beverages using the repertory grid method. International J. Food Sci Technol. 24(2):173-182
|
27 |
Sheen MR, Drayton JL. 1988. Influence of brand label on sensory perception. Thomson, D. M. H. (Ed.Food acceptability)
|
28 |
Shin SH, Shim JY, Yoon SH, Choi JH, Lee YS. 2010. The consumption pattern for named beverages - Research among University students in Seoul. Korea J. Food Culture. 25(6):820-831
과학기술학회마을
|
29 |
Solheim R, Lawless HT. 1996. Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods: liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price. Food Qual Prefer. 7(2):137-143
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Shin SY, Chung LN. 2007. The preference and frequency of beverages related to health factor in University students. Korea J. Food Culture. 22(4):420-433
과학기술학회마을
|
31 |
Stampanoni CR. 1993. Influence of acid and sugar content on sweetness, sourness and the flavor profile of beverages and sherbets. Food Qual Prefer. 4(3):169-176
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Tepper BJ, Trail AC. 1998. Taste or health: a study on consumer acceptance of corn chips. Food Qual Prefer. 9(4):267-272
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Vickers ZM. 1993. Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yogurt. J. Sens Stud. 8(4):341-352
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Westcombe A, Wardle J. 1997. Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods. Appetite. 28(1):49-6
DOI
ScienceOn
|