Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2020.43.4.123

A Study for Maintenance Period Extension based on Reliability of Korea Trainer  

Jo, Intak (Korea Aerospace Industries, LTD)
Park, Jong Hun (Business School, Daegu Catholic University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering / v.43, no.4, 2020 , pp. 123-132 More about this Journal
Abstract
Currently, there are two types of trainer in Korea : basic and advanced. Both models have been in operation for more than 10 years, and compared to the early stage of operation, reliability has gradually improved and failure rates have also entered a trend of stabilization. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the maintenance period considering economic feasibility. This study investigates the three maintenance period calculation methods: NAVAIR 00-25-403 [17], DOD, U.S. [4], CERL and US Army [3], with intention to extend the maintenance period of the trainer from current 200 hours to 400 hours. In addition, the maintenance period was calculated by the three methods with actual operational data. Common standards and procedures were established to apply operational data to the existing maintenance period calculation methods, the required reliability indicators were derived, and the maintenance periods was calculated based on the results, additionally, a review on the field applicability of the three maintenance cycles was conducted. An on-site interviews were conducted with the calculation results, and 11 out of the 15 items were expected to be extended by 400 hours. It was suggested that the remaining 4 items could be extended to 400 hours by supplementing the inspection method through additional analysis such as functional analysis, inspection content verification, and site connection.
Keywords
Maintenance Period; Reliability Centered Maintenance; RCM guide; NAVAIR 00-25-403; PM Point;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 AFMCI 21-103, Reliability-Centered Maintenance(RCM) Programs, 1993.
2 Barlow, R. and Proschan, F., Mathematical theory of reliability, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1996.
3 DOD, U.S., DoD guide for achieving Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability, 2005.
4 Han, Y.-H. and Kim, H.-S., Defense Acquisition Policy and successful R&D of T-50 Advanced Jet Trainer, Innovation Studies, 2012, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 115-135.
5 JA1012, S.A.E., A Guide to the Reliability-Centered Maintenance(RCM) Standard. The Engineering Society for Advancing Mobility Land, Sea. Air, and Space, Warren-dale, PA, 2002.
6 Jeon, T.B., Sohn, Y.H., and Kim, K.D., Optimal Number of Spare Engines and Modules for Aircraft Types, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2017, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 35-46.   DOI
7 MIL-HDBK-217F Notice 2, Military Handbook, Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, Department of Defense, 1995.
8 Jo, I.-T., Lee, S.-C., and Park, J.H., A Study on Reliability Growth through Failure Analysis by Operational Data of Avionic Equipments, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2013, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 100-108.   DOI
9 Kim, K.-W. and Shin, K.-S., A study on the Application Reliability Centered Maintenance of Aircraft Structure based on the Risk Assesment, Journal of the Aviation Management Society of Korea, 2013, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 61-74.
10 Mann, N.R., Singpurwalla, N.D., and Schafer, R.E,. Methods for statistical analysis of reliability and life data, New York, NY : Wiley, 1974.
11 MIL-HDBK-338B, Electronic Reliability Design Handbook, 1998.
12 MIL-STD-1843, Reliability-centered maintenance for aircraft, engines and equipment, 1986.
13 CERL, US Army, Technical Report-Reliability Centered Maintenance(RCM) Guide, 1993.
14 Moubray, J., Reliability-centered maintenance, Industrial Press Inc., 2001.
15 Son, Y.-T., Chun, H.-K., Uhm, H.-Y., Lee, H.-Y., Han, S.-Y., and Suh, M.-W., A Study on the Development of Webbased Preventive Maintenance System for the Driverless Rubber-Tired K-AGT, Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, 2010, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 36-47.
16 Nakagawa, T., Random maintenance policies, London : Springer, 2014.
17 NAVAIR 00-25-403, Guidelines for the Naval Aviation Reliability Centered Maintenance Process, 1993.
18 NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND, Reliability-Centerted Maintenance(RCM) Handbook, S9081-AB-GIB010, 2007.
19 Ryu, D., Improving reliability and quality for product success, Crc Press, 2012.
20 Smith, A.M. and Hinchcliffe, G.R,, RCM-Gateway to world class maintenance, Elsevier, 2003.
21 Song, K.-T., Kim, M.-H., Baek, Y.-G., Ahn, E.-J., and Lee, K.-S., Application of Reliability based Inspection for an Effective RCM Approach of Railway System, Proceedings of the KSR Conference, The Korean Society for Railway, 2008, pp. 1294-1300.
22 Nakagawa, T., Maintenance theory of reliability, Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.