Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2021.48.1.12

Survival Rates of Class II Restoration in Primary Molar with Flowable Resin Composite  

Seo, Hyejun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Park, Soyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
Lee, Eungyung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
Jeong, Taesung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Shin, Jonghyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry / v.48, no.1, 2021 , pp. 12-20 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival rate by comparing Class II restoration using flowable resin composite with stainless steel crown in primary molars. Electronic medical records and radiographs of 1,504 primary molars with proximal caries of 590 patients from June 2015 to August 2019 were analyzed. With the collected data, survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The 1-year survival rate of flowable resin composite in the primary molar was 98.5%, 3-year survival rate was 87.7%, and mean survival time was 39 months. There was no statistically significant difference between flowable resin composite and stainless steel crown (p = 0.896). Within the limits of this study, Class II restoration using flowable resin composite can be considered a promising option for the treatment of proximal caries in primary molars.
Keywords
Primary molar; Proximal caries; Flowable resin composite; Survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Full CA, Walker JD, Pinkham JR : Stainless steel crowns for deciduous molars.J Am Dent Assoc, 89:360-364, 1974.   DOI
2 Mirica IC, Furtos G, Moldovan M, et al. : Influence of Filler Loading on the Mechanical Properties of Flowable Resin Composites. Materials, 13:1477, 2020.   DOI
3 Hamama HH : Recent advances in posterior resin composite restorations. Applications of Nanocomposite Materials in Dentistry, Woodhead Publishing, 319-336, 2019.
4 Alyahya A, Khanum A, Qudeimat M : Clinical assessment of class II resin-based composites versus preformed metal crowns performed on primary molars in patients at high risk of caries. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 19:39-45, 2018.   DOI
5 de Avila NM, Bottezini PA, Lenzi TL, et al. : Prevalence of defective restorations and factors associated with re-intervention in primary teeth: A retrospective university-based study. Int J Paediatr Dent, 29:566-572, 2019.   DOI
6 Yilmaz Y, Belduz Kara N, Yilmaz A, Sahin H : Wear and repair of stainless steel crowns. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 12:25-30, 2011.
7 Tarang C, Gunjan Y, Arora D, et al. : Recent trends of Esthetics in Pediatric Dentistry. Int J Oral Health Med Res, 4:70-75, 2017.
8 Donly KJ, Garcia-Godoy F : The use of resin-based composite in children. Pediatr Dent, 24:480-488, 2002.
9 Craig R, Peyton F : Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin.J Dent Res, 37:710-718, 1958.   DOI
10 Willems G, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al. : A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater, 8:310-319, 1992.   DOI
11 Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. : Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Am J Dent, 26:351-355, 2013.
12 Poss S : Utilization of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin. Dent Today, 29:104, 2010.
13 Varpio M : Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up. ASDC J Dent Child, 52:435-440, 1985.
14 Attin T, Opatowski A, Monting J, et al. : Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent, 14:148-152, 2001.
15 Bural C, Oztas E, Ozturk S, Bayraktar G : Multidisciplinary treatment of non-syndromic oligodontia. Eur J Dent, 6:218-226, 2012.   DOI
16 Shwartz M, Grondahl H-G, Pliskin J, Boffa J : A longitudinal analysis from bite-wing radiographs of the rate of progression of approximal carious lesions through human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol, 29:529-536, 1984.   DOI
17 Chadwick B, Evans D : Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 8:14-21, 2007.   DOI
18 Chisini LA, Collares K, Demarco FF, et al. : Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent, 28:123-139, 2018.   DOI
19 Croll T, McKay M, Castaldi C : Impaction of permanent posterior teeth by overextended stainless steel crown margins. J Pedod, 5:240-244, 1981.
20 Bucher K, Metz I, Kuhnisch J, et al. : Flowable composite as a direct restoration technique for primary molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 243-246, 2017.
21 Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC : Flowable resin composites : A systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res, 9:ZE18-24, 2015.
22 Croll T : Silver solder enhancement of stainless steel crown occlusal surface thickness. Quintessence Int Dent Dig, 14: 39-42, 1983.
23 Torres CRG, Rego HMC, Gutierrez NC, et al. : A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations. J Dent, 42:793-799, 2014.   DOI
24 Mathewson RJ, Primosch RE : Fundamentals of pediatric dentistry, 3rd ed. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc, Illinois, 79, 1995.
25 Jih MK, Lee SH, Lee NY : Retrospective Study of Survival Rates According to the Type of Dental Restoration of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 42:249-256, 2015.
26 Sajjanshetty S, Patil P, Hugar D, Rajkumar K : Pediatric preformed metal crowns-an update. J Dent Allied Sci, 2:29, 2013.   DOI
27 Oldenburg TR, Vann W, Dilley DC : Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years. Pediatr Dent, 9:136-143, 1987.
28 Dejak B, Mlotkowski A : A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dent Mater, 31:e77-e87, 2015.   DOI
29 Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ : Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites.J Dent, 31:231-239, 2003.   DOI
30 Karibe H, Ogata K, Hasegawa Y, Ogihara K : Relation between clenching strength and occlusal force distribution in primary dentition.J Oral Rehabil, 30:307-311, 2003.   DOI
31 Sharma A, Tyagi R : Behavior assessment of children in dental settings: A retrospective study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 4:35-39, 2011.   DOI
32 Andersson-Wenckert I, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K : Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation. Acta Odontol Scand, 64:334-340, 2006.   DOI