Browse > Article

Phylogenetic relationships of Coryloideae based on waxy and atpB-rbcL sequences  

Yoo, Ki-Oug (Division of Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Wen, Jun (Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy / v.38, no.4, 2008 , pp. 371-388 More about this Journal
Abstract
Phylogenetic studies were conducted for 35 populations of the subfamily Coryloideae (Betulaceae) based on waxy gene of nuclear DNA and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer region of chloroplast DNA. Waxy data analysis suggest that Coryloideae is monophyletic; Corylus is monophyletic and basally branching within the subfamily Coryloideae; Ostryopsis is sister to the Carpinus and Ostrya clade, and the Ostrya is monophyletic (BS=86, PP=99). AtpB-rbcL intergenic spacer region analysis shows that Ostryopsis appeared as the most basal clade within the Coryloideae; Corylus is monophyletic(BS=98, PP=100) and placed between Carpinus-Ostrya and Ostryopsis clade; Carpinus and Ostrya formed a clade with a high support value(BS=100, PP=100). Carpinus sect. Carpinus is monophyletic, whereas sect. Distegocarpus is paraphyletic in the waxy tree. Corylus formed two subclades, but discordance at the infrageneric classification based on morphological characters. In the atpB-rbcL tree, Carpinus and Corylus taxa form a polytomy within the each clade. Results from the two data sets differ mainly in the relative position of Ostryopsis, the monophyly of Ostrya, and the relationships within the Carpinus-Ostrya clade. Further studies are needed for clarify the taxonomic position and the generic limitation.
Keywords
Coryloideae; nuclear DNA; waxy; chloroplast DNA; atpB-rbcL; phylogeny;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Abbe. E.C. 1935. Studies in the phylogeny of the Betulaceae. I. Floral and inflorescence anatomy and morphology. Bot. Gaz. 97: 1-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Chen, Z.-D., S.R. Manchester and Z.-Y. Zhang. 1991. A study on foliar epidermis in Betulaceae. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 29: 156-163.
3 Crane, P.R. 1989. Early fossil history and evolution of the Betulaceae. Pp. 87-116. In: Crane P.R., Blackmore S. (eds.), Evolution, systematics and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2. Systematics Association Special Volume 40B, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
4 Dahlgren, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic J. Bot. 3: 119-149.   DOI
5 M. Kallersjo, A.G. Kluge and C. Bult. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44: 570-572.   DOI
6 Forest, F. and A. Bruneau. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis, organization, and molecular evolution of the nontranscribed spacer of 5S ribosomal RNA genes in Corylus (Betulaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: 793-806.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Furlow, J.J. 1990. The genera of Betulaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 71: 1-67.   DOI
8 Hjelmqvist. H. 1948. Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of Amentiferae. Bot. Not., Suppl. 21, 1-171.
9 Jeon. J.-I and C.-S. Chang. 2000. Foliar flavonoids of genus Carpinus in eastern Asia, primarily based on native taxa to Korea. Kor. J. Plant Tax. 30: 139-153.   DOI
10 Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Molec. Evol. 16: 111-120.   DOI
11 Kikuzawa, K. 1982. Leaf survival and evolution in Betulaceae. Ann. Bot. 50: 345-353.   DOI
12 Li, J. 2008. Sequences of low-copy nuclear gene support the monophyly of Ostrya and paraphyly of Carpinus (Betulaceae). J. System. Evol. 46: 333-340.
13 Merida, A., J. M. Rodriguez-Galan, C. Vincent, and J. M. Romero. 1999. Expression of the granule-bound starch synthase I (waxy) gene from snapdragon is developmentally and circadian clock regulated. Pl. Physiol. 120: 401-409.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Rendle, A.B. 1925. The classification of flowering plants, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15 Rohde, W., D. Becker and F. Salamini. 1988. Structural analysis of the waxy locus from Hordeum vulgare. Nucleic Acids Research 16: 7185-7186.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Schneider, C. 1916. Betulaceae. Pp. 423-508, in Plantae Wilsonianae: an enumeration of the woody plants collected in western China for the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University during the years 1907, 1908, and 1910, vol. 2., ed., C.S. Sargent. Publications of the Arnold Arboretum, no. 4.
17 Spach. E. 1841. Notes sur les Corylus. Annals des Sciences Naturelles, ser. 2, 15: 98-108.
18 Wang, Z., Z. Wu, Y. Xing, F. Zheng, X. Guo, W. Zang, and M. Hong. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of rice waxy gene. Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 5898.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
20 Takhtajan, A. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46: 225-359.   DOI
21 Whitcher, I.N. 1999. The systematics and biogeography of hazelnuts, Corylus L. (Betulaceae). M.S. thesis. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.
22 Whitcher, I.N. and J. Wen. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cotylus (Betulaceae): inference from ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 26: 283-298.
23 Woodworth, R.H. 1931. Polyploidy in the Betulaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 12: 206-217.   DOI
24 Yoo, K.-O. and J. Wen. 2007. Phylogeny of Carpinus and subfamily Coryloideae (Betulaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 267: 25-35.   DOI
25 Metcalfe, C.R. and L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, vol. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
26 Felsenstain, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 789-791.
27 V, Savolainen, M.W. Chase, R. Lupia, A. Bruneau, and P.R. Crane. 2005. Teasing apart molecular-versus fossil-based error estimates when dating phylogenetic trees: A case study in the Birch family (Betulaceae). Syst. Bot. 30: 118-133.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 and K.A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Bousquet, J., S.H. Strauss, and P. Li. 1992. Complete congruence between morphological and rbcL-based molecular phylogenies in Birches and related species (Betulaceae). Molec. Biol. Evol. 9: 1076-1088.
30 Hardin, J.W. and J.M. Bell. 1986. Atlas of foliar surface features in woody plants. IX. Betulaceae of eastern United States. Brittonia 38: 133-144.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Kato. H., K, Oginuma, Z. Gu, B. Hammel and H. Tobe. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Betulaceae based on matK sequences with particular reference to the position of Ostryopsis. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 49: 89-97.
32 Clark, J, R., M. Robertson, and C. C. Ainsworth. 1991. Nucleotide sequence of a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cDNA clone encoding the waxy protein. Pl. Molec. Biol. 16: 1099-1101.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Hall, J.W. 1952. The comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the Betulaceae. Bot. Gaz. 113: 235-270.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Levin, R.A. and J.S. Miller. 2005. Relationships within tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae): paraphyly of Lycium and multiple origins of gender dimorphism. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 2044-2053.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Posada. D. and T.R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53: 793-808.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Mason-Garner, R.J., C.F. Weil and E.A. Kellogg. 1998. Granule-bound starch synthase: structure, function, and phylogenetic utility. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1658-1673.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Abbe. E.C. 1974. Flowers and inflorescences of the Amentiferae. Bot. Rev. 40: 159-261.   DOI
38 Chang, C.-S. and J.I. Jeon. 2004. Foliar flavonoids of the most primitive group, sect. Distegocarpus within the genus Carpinus. Biochem. Syst. and Evol. 32: 35-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Hoar, C.S. 1916. The anatomy and phylogenetic position of the Betulaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 3: 415-435.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Huelsenbeck, J.P. and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes. Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Prantl, K. 1894. Betulaceae. Pp. 38-46. In: Engler, A. and K. Prantl (eds.), Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 3. Englemann, Leipzig.
42 Setoguchi, H., M. Ono, H. Koyama and M. Tsuda. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae) based on the atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer of chloroplast DNA. J. Plant Res. 110: 469-484   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Heywood, V.H. 1993. Flowering plants of the world. BT Batsford Ltd, London.
44 Li, P.C. and S.X. Cheng. 1979. Betulaceae. Pp. 44-137. In: Kuang, K.Z. and P.C. Lee (eds.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 21. Science Press, Beijing.
45 Stone, D.E. 1973. Patterns in the evolution of amentiferous fruits. Brittonia 25: 371-384.   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Winkler, H. 1904. Betulaceae. Pp. 1-149. In: Engler, A. and K. Prantl (eds.), Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 19 (IV, 61). Englemann, Peipzig.
47 Evans, R.C., L.A. Alice, C.S. Cambell, E.A. Kelloggs and T.A. Dickinson. 2000. The granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene in the Rosaceae: multiple loci and phylogenetic utility. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 17: 388-400.   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Nakai, T. 1915. Flora Sylvatica Koreana, vol. 2. Chosen Government Press, Seoul.
49 Yoo, K.-O. and J. Wen. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of Carpinus and subfamily Coryloideae (Betulaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 641-650.   DOI   ScienceOn
50 Hutchinson, J. 1967. The genera of flowering plants, vol. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
51 Thorne, R.F. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58: 226-257.
52 Bobrov, E.G. 1936. Histoire et systematique du genre Corylus. Sovietskaia Botanica 1936: 11-51.(in Russian).
53 Kubitzki, K. 1993. The families and genera of vascular plants. vol. 2. Springer, Berlin.
54 Woodworth, R.H. 1929. Cytological studies in the Betulaceae. II. Alnus and Corylus. Bot. Gaz. 88: 383-399.   DOI   ScienceOn
55 De Candolle, A. 1864. Corylus. Pp. 128-133. In: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 16, part 2, Paris: Treuttel and Wurtz.
56 Van Der Leij, F. R., R. G. F. Visser, A. S. Ponstein, E. Jacobsen, and W. J. Feenstra. 1991. Sequence of the structural gene for granule-bound starch synthase of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and evidence for a single point deletion in the amf allele. Mol. Gen. Genet. 228: 240-248.   DOI
57 Brunner, F. and D.E. Fairbrothers. 1979. Serological investigations of the Corylaceae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 106: 97-103.   DOI   ScienceOn
58 Doyle, J.J. and J.L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
59 Hu, H.H. 1964. The materials on the monography of genus Carpinus Linn. of China. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 9: 281-298.
60 Shure, M., S. Wessler and N. Federoff. 1983. Molecular identification and isolation of the waxy locus in maize. Cell 35: 225-233.   DOI   ScienceOn
61 Wang, S. J., K. W. Yen, and C. Y. Tsai. 1999. Molecular characterization and expression of starch granule-bound starch synthase in the sink and source tissues of sweet potato. Physiol. Pl. 106: 253-261.   DOI
62 Farris, J.S., M. Kallersjo, A.G. Kluge and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.   DOI   ScienceOn
63 Dry, I., A. Smith, A. Edwards, M. Bhattacharyya, P. Dunn, and C. Martin. 1992. Characterization of cDNAs encoding two isoforms of granule-bound starch synthase which show differential expression in developing storage organs of pea and potato. Plant Journal 2: 193-202.
64 Gibson, T., D. Higgins and J. Thompson. 1994. Clustal X Program. EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany.
65 Klosgen, R.B., A. Gierl, Z.S. Schwarz-Sommer and H. Saedler. 1986. Molecular analysis of the waxy locus of Zea may. Molec. Gen. Genet. 203: 237-244.   DOI   ScienceOn
66 Chen, Z.-D., S.R. Manchester and H.Y. Sun. 1999. Phylogeny and evolution of the Betulaceae as inferred from DNA sequences, morphology, and paleobotany. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1168-1181.   DOI   ScienceOn
67 Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, London.
68 Woodworth, R.H. 1930. Cytological studies in the Betulaceae. IV. Betula, Carpinus, Ostrya, Ostryopsis. Bot. Gaz. 90: 108-115.   DOI   ScienceOn
69 Erdogan, V. and S.A. Mehlenbacher. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of Corylus species (Betulaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS region and chloroplast matK gene sequences. Syst. Bot. 25: 727-737.   DOI   ScienceOn
70 Mabberley. D.J. 1997. The plant book, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.