Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.8.637

A Correlation Analysis of the River Naturalness and Water Quality for Biological Habitat Evaluation  

Park Bong-Jin (Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Sung Young-Du (Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Jung Kwan-Sue (Dept. of Civil engineering, ChungNam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Water Resources Association / v.39, no.8, 2006 , pp. 637-644 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the analysis of river naturalness and water quality were executed in the major rivers of the Nakdong River Basin. As a result, the assessment index of the General Evaluation was 1.428 to 4.107 as $1^{st}$ to $4^{th}$ grades. The River Shape was 1.929 to 4.429 as $2^{nd}$ to $4^{th}$ grades and the River Environment was 1.774 to 3.643 as $1^{st}$ to $4^{th}$ grades. As well, evaluation of water quality showed that concentration of pH was 7.102 to 8.497 mg/l, BOD was 0.748 to 5.271 mg/l, DO was 5.077 to 12.335 mg/l and 55 was 3.658 to 19.960 mg/l. The correlation between river naturalness and water quality was analyzed to investigate similarity and independence of river naturalness evaluation index. It was shown that coefficient of correlation was low with value of -0.1503 to -0.5886, therefore, was evaluated as independent.
Keywords
Biological Habitat; Evaluation of River Naturalness; Water Quality; Correlation analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Collier, K.J., McColl, R.H.S. (1993). 'Assessing the Natural Value of New Zealand Rivers.' River Conseroation and Management, Edited by P. J. Boon, P. Calow, G.E. Petts, New York, John Wiley & Sond, pp. 195-211
2 Environment Agency (1997). River Habitat Survey: 1997 Field Survey Guidance Mannual
3 Prichard et al. (1998). Riparian Area Management: Process for Assessing Proper Functioning Condition. TR 1737-9 (Revised 1998)'. Bureau of Land Management, BLM/SC/ST-93/003+1737+REV95+REV98, Service Center, Co. 51
4 USDA (1998). Stream Visual Assessment Protocal. National Water and Climat Center Technical Note 99-1
5 Ward et al. (2003). 'A Comparison of Three Visual Assessments for Riparian and Stream Health.' Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, MIA, pp. 83-88
6 조용현 (1997a). 생태적 복원을 위한 중소하천 자연도 평가방법 개발, 박사학위논문, 서울대학교
7 정정채, 이상석 (1998). '중 . 소도시 하천의 친환경적 활용 잠재력평가에 관한 연구' 한국조경학회지, 한국조경학회, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 96-112   과학기술학회마을
8 Barbour et al. (1999). Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers : Periphyton; Benthic Macroinoertebnues and Fish Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C
9 김동찬, 박익수 (1999). '생태환경복원을 위한 하천자연도 평가기준에 관한 연구' 한국조경학회지, 한국조경학회, Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 123-134
10 박병철, 신영철, 서애숙 (2002). 'GIS를 이용한 하천의 자연성 평가 : 청주시 무심천 지역을 중심으로' 한국지리정보학회지, 제5권, 제1호, pp. 48-57
11 박봉진, 정관수 (2004). '낙동강 유역내 주요하천의 하 천자연도평가 결과' 수자원정보, 한국수자원공사, 2004년 겨울호, pp. 56-67
12 박봉진, 신종이, 정관수 (2005a). '하천의 생물서식처 복원을 위한 하천자연도 평가 : I. 평가 방법의 적용' 한국수자원학회 논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제38권, 제1호, pp. 37-48   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
13 박봉진, 신종이, 정관수 (2005b). '하천의 생물서식처 복원을 위한 하천자연도 평가 : II. 평가방법의 제안' 한국수자원학회 논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제38권, 제1호, pp. 49-57
14 박원진, 마호섭 (2003). '양재천의 식행현황과 하천자연도 평가.' 농업과학생명연구, 경상대학교 농업생명과학연구원, 제37권, 제2호, pp. 57-70
15 배연재, 원두희, 이웅재, 승현우 (2003). '하천생태계에 대한 환경평가 기법과 생물다양성 관리시스템의 개발 및 적용' 한국환경생물학회지, 한국환경생물학회, 제21권, 제3호, pp. 223-233   과학기술학회마을
16 조용현 (1997b). '우리 나라 중소하천 코리도의 자연성 평가기법연구' 한국조경학회지, 한국조경학회, Vol. 25, No.2, pp. 73-81   과학기술학회마을
17 建設省東北地方建設局(1994). 東北の自然豊かな川づくり一近自然化河道改修計劃檢討マニコアル