Browse > Article

Status and its Improvement of Comprehensive Water Quality Evaluation  

Choi, Ji Yong (Korea Environment Institute)
Lee, Jee Hyun (Korea Environment Institute)
Lee, Jae Kwan (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Kim, Chang Su (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Publication Information
Abstract
Accurate and timely information on status and trends in the environment is necessary to shape sound water quality management policy and to implement water quality improvement programs efficiently. One of the most effective ways to communicate information on water quality trends to policy-makers, scientists, and the general public is with comprehensive water quality indices. The derivation and structure of a water quality index (WQI) for the classification of surface water quality is discussed. The WQI generally developed through the selection, transformation and weighting of determinants with rating curves based on legal standards and quality directives or guidelines. The representative pollutants should be included in the index, and the relationship between the quantity of these pollutants in the water and the resulting quality of the water should be based on scientific results. The WQI be simply and meaningfully formulated that nonscientifically trained users can easily become familiar with the framework of the system and use the output data to evaluate their own pollution problems.
Keywords
Comprehensive water quality evaluation; Surface water quality; Water Quality Index (WQI);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 환경부 . 국립환경과학원, 물환경종합평가방법개발조사연구 (ll) 최종보고서, pp. 73-80 (2005.10)
2 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life, CCME Quality Index 1.0 Technical Report (2001a)
3 과학기술처, 환경지표의 종합체계화 기법개발 및 활용방안에 관한 연구(I), p. 58 (1989)
4 Department of the Army Rock Island District Corps of Engineers, Water Quality Studies-Red Rock and Saylorville Reservoirs, Des Moines River, Iowa, annual report, pp. 94-95 (2002)
5 Wilkes University Center for Environmental Quality Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, http://www.water-research. net/watrqualindex (accessed May 2006)
6 North Carolina Department of Envionment and Natural Resources, http://www.owr.ehnr.state.nc.us/ref/10/09520/soer 97_water.htm (accessed May 2006)
7 Boulder Community Network of Colorado, http://bcn.boulder. co.us/basin/data/WQI (accessed May 2006)
8 최지용, 종합수질지표의 개발, 한국환경기술개발원, pp. 10-45 (1996)
9 French Water Agencies, Water quality assessment of water courses: water S.E.Q.(version 1) general principles, Water agencies studies NO.64 (2000.1)
10 Ministry of Agriculture & Agro-Based Industry of Malaysia, http://agrolink.moa.my/did/river/sgklang/sgklang_wqi .htm (accessed May 2006)
11 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life, CCME Quality Index 1.0 User's Manual (2001b)
12 Des Moines River Water Quality Network, http://te-webserver.cce. iastate.edu/research/lutzldmrwqn/dmrwqn.html, (accessed May 2006)
13 North Carolina Department of Envionment and Natural Resources, http://www.owr.ehnr.state.nc.us/ref/10/09520/soer 97_water.htm (accessed May 2006)
14 House, M. A. and Ellis, J. B., The development of Water Quality Indices for Operational Management, Water Science Technology, 19(9) pp. 124-131 (1987)