Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2017.20.4.287

Analysis of Affective Factors in Mathematics Learning of Elementary School Students  

Do, Joowon (Department of Mathematics Education, Graduate School of Education, Seoul National University of Education)
Paik, Suckyoon (Department of Mathematics Education, Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.20, no.4, 2017 , pp. 287-303 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to understand the characteristics of affect of elementary school students in this study, we used a questionnaire developed by Hannula (2012) to measure elementary students' beliefs and affective factors about mathematics based on the emotional, cognitive, and motivational dimensions of the affect of personal level. Statistical analysis and one-way ANOVA were conducted to identify the characteristics of elementary school students' beliefs and affective factors about mathematics according to mathematics achievement level, grade level, and gender. Regression analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between the factors. The results of this study are compared with the results of the previous study which used comparative study of elementary school students in Finland and Chile using the questionnaire used in this study.
Keywords
affective factor; characteristics of affect; belief about mathematics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tuohilampi, L., Hannula, M. S., Giaconi, V., Laine, A., and Naveri, L. (2013). Comparing the Structures of 3rd Graders' Mathematics-related Affect in Chile and Finland. In Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education(CERME8). Antalya: ERME.
2 Tuohilampi, L., Hannula, M. S., & Varas, L. (2014a). 9-year old students' self-related belief structures regarding mathematics: a comparison between Finland and Chile. In M. Hannula, P. Portaankorva-Koivisto, A. Laine, & L. Naveri (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th conference of the mathematical views, 15-26. Helsinki, Finland: MAVI.
3 Tuohilampi, L., Hannula, M. S., Varas, L., Giaconi, V., Laine, A., Naveri, L., & Nevado, L. S. I. (2014b). Challenging the Western approach to cultural comparisons: Young pupils' affective structures regarding mathematics in Finland and Chile. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1625-1648.   DOI
4 Tuohilampi, L., Laine, A., Hannula, M. S., & Varas. L. (2016). A Comparative Study of Finland and Chile: the Culture-Dependent Significance of the Individual and Interindividual Levels of the Mathematics-Related Affect. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1093-1111.   DOI
5 Yildrim, A. K. (2006). Description of students' beliefs on their problem solving skills. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
6 권미연.전평국 (1999). 초, 중학생들의 수학적 신념 형성의 요인 분석 - 수학 교실의 사회적 규범을 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 8, 189-207. (Kwon, Mi yeon and Jeon, Pyung Kook (1999). Analysis of factors of mathematical belief formation in middle school students - Focusing on the social norms of the classroom. E: Communications of Mathematical Education 8, 189-207.)
7 김도연.김홍찬 (2013). 중학교 3학년 학생들의 "단원별 이해도에 대한 신념"과 학업성취도와의 관계 및 수학적 개념, 수학적 절차에 대한 이해 정도 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 27(4), 499-521. (Kim. Do Yeon and Kim, Hong Chan (2013). Analysis on the Relationship between the 3ed Grade Middle School Students' BElief about Understanding and Academic Achievement, Mathematical Concepts, Maathematical Procedures. E: Communications of Mathematical Education 27(4), 499-521.)
8 이종희.김선희.김수진.김기연.김부미.윤수철. 김윤민 (2011). 수학 학습에 대한 정의적 성취 검사 도구 개발 및 검증. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 50(2), 247-261. (Lee, Chong hee, Kim, Sun Hee, Kim, Soo jin, Kim, Ki yeon, Kim, Bu mi, Tun, Soo cheol, Kim, and Yun min (2011). Development and verification of an affective inventory in Mathematical Learning. A: The Mathematical Education 50(2), 247-261.)
9 김부미 (2012). 우리나라 중, 고등학생의 수학적 신념 측정 및 특성 분석. 수학교육학연구 22(2), 229-259. (Kim, Bumi (2012). Instrument Development and Analysis of Secondary Students' Mathematical Beliefs. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 22(2), 229-259)
10 안윤경.김선희 (2011). 수학 문제 해결 과정에서 학생들의 감정 변화에 대한 사례 연구. 수학교육학연구 21(3), 295-311. (Ahn, Yoon Kyeong, Kim, Sun Hee (2011). The Variation of Emotions in Mathematical Problem Solving. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation 14(1), 229-255.)
11 Cobb, P., Yackel E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children's emotional acts while engaged in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective, 118-148. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12 DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem-solving. In: E. Pekhonen (Ed.) Proceedings of the PME 21, Vol. 2, 209-216.
13 DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and Meta-affect in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Representational Perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147.   DOI
14 Furinghetti, F. & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics education? 39-57. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15 김부미 (2011). 수학 문제해결 신념의 측정도구 개발. 교육과정평가연구 14(1), 229-255. (Kim, Bumi (2011). Instrument Development for Mathematical Problem-Solving Belief. The Journal of Curriculumand Evaluation 14(1), 229-255)
16 Hannula, M. S. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics-related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137-161.   DOI
17 Giaconi, V., Varas, M. L., Tuohilampi, L., & Hannula, M. (2016). Affective Factors and Beliefs About Mathematics of Young Chilean Children: Understanding Cultural Characteristics. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems, 37-51. AG Switzerland: Springer.
18 Goldin, G. A . (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics education? 59-72. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19 Hannula, M. S. (2011). The structure and dynamics of affect in mathematical thinking and learning. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 34-60. Rzeszow, Poland: ERME.
20 Hannula, M. S. & Laakso, J. (2011). The structure of mathematics related beliefs, attitudes and motivation among Finnish grade 4 and grade 8 students. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 9-16. Ankara, Turkey: PME.
21 Hart, L. E. (1989). Describing the affective domain: saying shat we mean. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving. A new perspective, 37-45. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22 Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problemsolving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective, 75-88. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23 Malmivuori, M. L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 149-164.   DOI
24 Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Student Center website:http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/download-center/
25 McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 575-596. New York: Macmillan.
26 McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 637-647.   DOI
27 Moscucci. M. (2010). Why is there not enough fuss about affect and meta-affect among mathematics teacher? Proceedings of the CERME-6. 1811-1820
28 OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD.
29 Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students' Mathematics-related beliefs: A quest for conceptual clarity & a comprehensive categorization. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics education? 13-37. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.   DOI
31 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
32 Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem-solving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education, 33-60. NJ: Hillsdale.