Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.657

Relationships between EGFR Mutation Status of Lung Cancer and Preoperative Factors - Are they Predictive?  

Usuda, Katsuo (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Sagawa, Motoyasu (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Motono, Nozomu (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Ueno, Masakatsu (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Tanaka, Makoto (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Machida, Yuichiro (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Matoba, Munetaka (Department of Radiology, Kanazawa Medical University)
Taniguchi, Mitsuru (Department of Radiology, Kanazawa Medical University)
Tonami, Hisao (Department of Radiology, Kanazawa Medical University)
Ueda, Yoshimichi (Department of Pathophysiological and Experimental Pathology, Kanazawa Medical University)
Sakuma, Tsutomu (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.2, 2014 , pp. 657-662 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status of lung cancer is important because it means that EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is indicated. The purpose of this prospective study is to determine whether EGFR mutation status could be identified with reference to preoperative factors. Materials and Methods: One hundred-forty eight patients with lung cancer (111 adenocarcinomas, 25 squamous cell carcinomas and 12 other cell types) were enrolled in this study. The EGFR mutation status of each lung cancer was analyzed postoperatively. Results: There were 58 patients with mutant EGFR lung cancers (mutant LC) and 90 patients with wild-type EGFR lung cancers (wild-type LC). There were significant differences in gender, smoking status, maximum tumor diameter in chest CT, type of tumor shadow, clinical stage between mutant LC and wild-type LC. EGFR mutations were detected only in adenocarcinomas. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax:$3.66{\pm}4.53$) in positron emission tomography-computed tomography of mutant LC was significantly lower than that ($8.26{\pm}6.11$) of wild-type LC (p<0.0001). Concerning type of tumor shadow, the percentage of mutant LC was 85.7% (6/7) in lung cancers with pure ground glass opacity (GGO), 65.3%(32/49) in lung cancers with mixed GGO and 21.7%(20/92) in lung cancers with solid shadow (p<0.0001). For the results of discriminant analysis, type of tumor shadow (p=0.00036) was most significantly associated with mutant EGFR. Tumor histology (p=0.0028), smoking status (p=0.0051) and maximum diameter of tumor shadow in chest CT (p=0.047) were also significantly associated with mutant EGFR. The accuracy for evaluating EGFR mutation status by discriminant analysis was 77.0% (114/148). Conclusions: Mutant EGFR is significantly associated with lung cancer with pure or mixed GGO, adenocarcinoma, never-smoker, smaller tumor diameter in chest CT. Preoperatively, EGFR mutation status can be identified correctly in about 77 % of lung cancers.
Keywords
Lung cancer; EGFR mutation; ground glass opacity; discriminant analysis; PET-CT;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al (1988). Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology, 168, 497-505.   DOI
2 International Union Against Cancer (2009). TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. NY, Wiley-Liss, 138-46.
3 Jorissen RN, Walker F, Pouliot N, et al (2003). Epidermal growth factor receptor: mechanisms of activation and signalling. Exp Cell Res, 284, 31-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kitamura H, Kameda Y, Ito T, Hayashi H (1999). Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung. Implications for the pathogenesis of peripheral lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol, 111, 610-22.
5 Lee HY, Lee KS (2011). Ground-glass opacity nodules: histopathology, imaging evaluation, and clinical implications. J Thorac Imaging, 26, 106-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Liu WS, Zhao LJ, Pang QS, et al (2014). Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected lung adenocarcinomas. Med Oncol, 31, 771.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al (2004). Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med, 350, 2129-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Mak RH, Digumarthy SR, Muzikansky A, et al (2011). Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist, 16, 319-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Mclntire MG, Santagata S, Ligon K, Chirieac LR (2010). Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung. Am J Transl Res, 2, 309-15.
10 Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, et al (2004). Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 22, 1103-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al (2011). International association for the study of lung cancer/ american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol, 6, 244-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Usuda K, Zhao XT, Sagawa M, et al (2013). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal intensity and distribution represent the amount of cancer cells and their distribution in primary lung cancer. Clinical Imaging, 37, 265-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ, et al (2011). Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol, 24, 653-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Paez JG, Janne PA PA, Lee JC, et al (2004). EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science, 304, 1497-500.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Dwamena BA, Sonnad SS, Angobaldo JO, et al (1999). Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Mediastinal staging in the 1990s. Meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT. Radiology, 213, 530-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hsieh RK, Lim KH, Kuo HT, et al (2005). Female sex and bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype predict EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest, 128, 317-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Mori T, Nomori H, Ikeda K, et al (2008). Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules/masses. Comparison with positron emission tomography. J Thoracic Oncol, 3, 358-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Raz DJ, He B, Rosell R, Jablons DM (2006). Bronchioloalveolsr carcinoma. A review. Clinical Lung cancer, 7, 313-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Kuroki S, et al (2004). Diffusion-weighted single shot echo planar imaging of colorectal cancer using a sensitivity-encoding technique. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 34, 620-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al (2004). EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101, 13306-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sun PL, Seol H, Lee HJ, et al (2012). High incidence of EGFR mutations in Korean men smokers with no intratumoral heterogeneity of lung adenocarcinomas: correlation with histologic subtypes, EGFR/TTF-1 expressions, and clinical features. J Thorac Oncol, 7, 323-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Tam IYS, Chung LP, Suen WS, et al (2006). Distinct epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation patterns in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different tobacco exposure and clinicopathologic features. Clin Cancer Res, 12, 1647-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Toloza EM, Harpole L, McCrory DC (2003). Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Chest, 123, 137-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Na II, Byun BH, Kim KM, et al (2010). 18F-FDG uptake and EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis. Lung Cancer, 67, 76-80.   DOI   ScienceOn