1 |
Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., & Louviere, J. (2000). Choice modeling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecological Economics, 35(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9
DOI
|
2 |
Whitten, S. M., & Bennett, J. (2004). The private and social values of wetlands. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
|
3 |
Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (Eds.). (2001). The choice modeling approach to environmental valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
|
4 |
Diafas, I., Barkmann, J., & Mburu, J. (2017). Measurement of bequest value using a non-monetary payment in a choice experiment: The case of improving forest ecosystem services for the benefit of local communities in rural Kenya. Ecological Economics, 140, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.006
DOI
|
5 |
Guo, X., Liu, H., Mao, X., Jin, J., Chen, D., & Cheng, S. (2014). Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China. Energy Policy, 68, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.032
DOI
|
6 |
Khai, H. V., & Yabe, M. (2014). Choice modeling: Assessing the non-market environmental values of the biodiversity conservation of swamp forest in Vietnam. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5(1), 1-8.
DOI
|
7 |
Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (2001). The choice modeling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
|
8 |
Othman, J., Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (2004). Environmental values and resource management options: A choice modeling experience in Malaysia. Environment and Development Economics, 803-824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X04001718
DOI
|
9 |
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge university press.
|
10 |
Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269
DOI
|
11 |
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE). (2008). The 4th country report Vietnam's implementation of the biodiversity convention. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Environment Administration.
|
12 |
Birol, E., Karousakis, K., & Koundouri, P. (2006). Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.002
DOI
|
13 |
Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421-446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619
DOI
|
14 |
Do, T. N., & Bennett, J. (2009). Estimating wetland biodiversity values: A choice modeling application in Vietnam's Mekong River Delta. Environment and Development Economics, 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1.1.660.3008
|
15 |
Khai, H. V., & Yabe, M. (2015). Consumer preferences for agricultural products considering the value of biodiversity conservation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal for Nature Conservation, 25, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.004
DOI
|
16 |
Layton, D. F. (2000). Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1104
DOI
|
17 |
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE). (2015). Nation Environmental Status Report for the period of 2011-2015. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Environment Administration.
|
18 |
Revelt, D., & Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735
DOI
|