Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no8.0465

An Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Choice Modeling Application to the Mekong Delta Project in Vietnam  

KHAI, Huynh Viet (Department of Environmental and Resource Economics, School of Economics, Can Tho University)
VAN, Nguyen Phi (School of Economics, Can Tho University)
DANH, Vo Thanh (Department of Environmental and Resource Economics, School of Economics, Can Tho University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.8, 2021 , pp. 465-473 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is the application of a choice experiment to assess Mekong Delta urban households' preferences and motivations for ecosystem conservation in the U Minh forest. The study applied a choice modeling approach to estimate the economic values of the proposed ecosystem conservation program in the U Minh forest by accessing urban consumer preferences and their willingness to pay for the project. Discrete choice experimental data was collected from 450 residents in the cities of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. The multinomial logit model was employed to identify consumer's stated preferences for the environmental and sustainability attributes of the conservation project. The results showed that Mekong Delta urban residents paid much attention to the proposed project to protect and develop the U Minh forest. In addition, the results showed that higher education, income, and knowledge of the U Minh forest revealed a higher likelihood of selecting the project, while the older residents would select the status quo more than the younger ones. The study also proved that the effect of participation had a strong impact on the willingness to pay for the project. The findings could be useful for policymakers to take action to raise resident's awareness and willingness to pay for the U Minh forest project.
Keywords
Choice Experiment; Ecosystem Conservation; Marginal Willingness to Pay; Vietnam;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., & Louviere, J. (2000). Choice modeling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecological Economics, 35(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9   DOI
2 Whitten, S. M., & Bennett, J. (2004). The private and social values of wetlands. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3 Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (Eds.). (2001). The choice modeling approach to environmental valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
4 Diafas, I., Barkmann, J., & Mburu, J. (2017). Measurement of bequest value using a non-monetary payment in a choice experiment: The case of improving forest ecosystem services for the benefit of local communities in rural Kenya. Ecological Economics, 140, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.006   DOI
5 Guo, X., Liu, H., Mao, X., Jin, J., Chen, D., & Cheng, S. (2014). Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China. Energy Policy, 68, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.032   DOI
6 Khai, H. V., & Yabe, M. (2014). Choice modeling: Assessing the non-market environmental values of the biodiversity conservation of swamp forest in Vietnam. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5(1), 1-8.   DOI
7 Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (2001). The choice modeling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
8 Othman, J., Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (2004). Environmental values and resource management options: A choice modeling experience in Malaysia. Environment and Development Economics, 803-824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X04001718   DOI
9 Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge university press.
10 Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269   DOI
11 Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE). (2008). The 4th country report Vietnam's implementation of the biodiversity convention. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Environment Administration.
12 Birol, E., Karousakis, K., & Koundouri, P. (2006). Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.002   DOI
13 Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421-446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619   DOI
14 Do, T. N., & Bennett, J. (2009). Estimating wetland biodiversity values: A choice modeling application in Vietnam's Mekong River Delta. Environment and Development Economics, 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1.1.660.3008
15 Khai, H. V., & Yabe, M. (2015). Consumer preferences for agricultural products considering the value of biodiversity conservation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal for Nature Conservation, 25, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.004   DOI
16 Layton, D. F. (2000). Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1104   DOI
17 Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE). (2015). Nation Environmental Status Report for the period of 2011-2015. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Environment Administration.
18 Revelt, D., & Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735   DOI