Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.1175

Machiavellianism in a Synergistic Tax Climate  

CAHYONOWATI, Nur (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University)
RATMONO, Dwi (Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University)
DEWAYANTO, Totok (Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.12, 2020 , pp. 1175-1184 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research examines the personal (i.e., Machiavellianism) and situational factors (i.e., tax climate) that are believed to be psychologically salient aspects in tax compliance. To the best of our knowledge, no research has been carried out to investigate the interaction effect of the two factors. This study uses a paper-and-pencil laboratory experiment 2x2 between-subject factorial design that involved 158 participants. The results indicate that a taxpayer who has a low Machiavellianism score or who is in a high synergistic tax climate reports a higher level of income. In the high synergistic tax climate, where tax norms apply, personal ethics do not play a significant role in tax compliance decisions. Where the synergistic relationship between taxpayer and authorities is low, personal ethics play an important role, i.e., low Machiavellians report a higher reported income than high Machiavellians do. This research contributes to the literature that deviates from the traditional model of tax compliance. Taxpayers are not always rational, but they might pay tax for reasons other than financial motives (Alm, 1991, 2018), that is, personal ethics in this study. This research implies the need for policymakers to consider other approaches rather than only relying on audits and fines.
Keywords
Machiavellianism; Synergistic Tax Climate; Tax Compliance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2   DOI
2 Alm, J. (2018). What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 00(0), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272   DOI
3 Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M   DOI
4 Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9   DOI
5 Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818-860.
6 Ashton, R. H., & Kramer, S. S. (1980). Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490389   DOI
7 Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090-1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030939   DOI
8 Blanthorne, C., & Kaplan, S. (2008). An egocentric model of the relations among the opportunity to underreport, social norms, ethical beliefs, and underreporting behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7-8), 684-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.001   DOI
9 Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the Role of Social Norms in Tax Compliance Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1390-7   DOI
10 Alm, J. (1991). A Perspective on the Experimental Analysis of Taxpayer Reporting. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 577.
11 Bornman, M. (2015). The Determinants and Measurement of Trust in Tax Authorities As a Factor Influencing Tax Compliance Behaviour. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 8(3), 772-789.
12 Braithwaite, J., & Makkai, T. (1994). Trust and compliance. Policing and Society, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1994.9964679   DOI
13 Brizi, A., Giacomantonio, M., Schumpe, B. M., & Mannetti, L. (2015). Intention to pay taxes or to avoid them: The impact of social value orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 50, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.005   DOI
14 Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism (L. Festinger & S. Schachter (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, Inc.
15 Chung, J., & Trivedi, V. U. (2003). The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Compliance Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 133-145.   DOI
16 Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Savoia, A. (2012). Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.003   DOI
17 Devos, K. (2014). Factors Influencing Individual Taxpayer Compliance Behaviour. New York, NY: Springer.
18 Durham, Y., Manly, T. S., & Ritsema, C. (2014). The effects of income source, context, and income level on tax compliance decisions in a dynamic experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.012   DOI
19 Eisenhauer, J. G., Geide-Stevenson, D., & Ferro, D. L. (2011). Experimental estimates of taxpayer ethics. Review of Social Economy, 69(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760802714867   DOI
20 Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100032   DOI
21 Ghosh, D., & Crain, T. L. (1996). Experimental investigation of ethical standards and perceived probability of audit on intentional noncompliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8.
22 Gobena, L. B., & Van Dijke, M. (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of tax compliance among Ethiopian business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004   DOI
23 Hartmann, F. G. H., & Maas, V. S. (2010). Why Business Unit Controllers Create Budget Slack: Involvement in Management, Social Pressure, and Machiavellianism. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.27   DOI
24 Hasseldine, D. J., & Bebbington, K. J. (1991). Blending economic deterrence and fiscal psychology models in the design of responses to tax evasion: The New Zealand experience. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(2), 299-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(91)90018-O   DOI
25 Henderson, B. C., & Kaplan, S. E. (2005). An Examination of the Role of Ethics in Tax Compliance Decisions. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 27(1), 39-72. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata.2005.27.1.39   DOI
26 James, S., & Alley, C. (2002). Tax Compliance, Self-Assessment and Tax Administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27-42.
27 Kaplanoglou, G., & Rapanos, V. T. (2015). Why do people evade taxes? New experimental evidence from Greece. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 56, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.02.005   DOI
28 Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The "slippery slope" framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004   DOI
29 Kim, H.-S., & Lee, H.-A. (2020). Associations among procedural fairness, tax compliance, and tax re-audits. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.187   DOI
30 Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31 Kogler, C., Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Testing the "slippery slope framework" among self-employed taxpayers. Economics of Governance, 16(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-015-0158-9   DOI
32 Le, H. T. H., Tuyet, V. T. B., Hanh, C. T. B., & Do, Q. H. (2020). Factors affecting tax compliance among small-and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.209   DOI
33 Lin Mei, T., & Xiaoqian, L. (2016). SMEs tax compliance: a matter of trust ? Australian Tax Forum, 31(May), 527-555.
34 Mittone, L. (2006). Dynamic behaviour in tax evasion: An experimental approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 813-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.065   DOI
35 Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., & Schwarzenberger, H. (2011). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the "slippery slope" framework. European Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9236-9   DOI
36 Niesiobedzka, M. (2014). Relations between Procedural Fairness, Tax Morale, Institutional Trust and Tax Evasion. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 5(1).
37 Murphy, K. (2004). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca   DOI
38 Murphy, P. R. (2012). Attitude, Machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.002   DOI
39 Nguyen, T. T. D., Pham, T. M. L., Le, T. T., Truong, T. H. N., & Tran, M. D. (2020). Determinants influencing tax compliance: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.65   DOI
40 Parlaungan, G. (2014). The Tax Morale of the Individual Taxpayers in Indonesia by Demographic Factors. PhD Dissertation. Curtin University. Australia. https://www.business.unsw.edu.au/About-Site/Schools-Site/Taxation-Business-Law-Site/Documents/Parlaungan-The-Tax-Morale-of-the-Individual-Taxpayers-in-Indonesia-by-Demographic-Factors.pdf
41 Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance A study of Hong Kong tax professionals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 695-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872978   DOI
42 Shafer, W. E., & Wang, Z. (2017). Machiavellianism, social norms, and taxpayer compliance. Business Ethics: A European Review, July, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12166   DOI
43 Soliz, A. B. (2015). Tax compliance: ethical orientation, risk perception and the role of the tax preparer (Issue December). The University of Mississippi.
44 Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617.   DOI
45 Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: An empirical analysis of the "slippery slope framework." Law and Policy, 32(4), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00327.x   DOI
46 Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.629   DOI
47 Wenzel, M. (2004a). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00168-X   DOI
48 Wenzel, M. (2004b). The Social Side of Sanctions: Personal and Social Norms as Moderators of Deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5), 547-567.   DOI