Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.1053

Factors Determining Intention to Use Banking Technology in Indonesian Islamic Microfinance  

WIBOWO, Kartiko Adi (Universitas Islam Indonesia)
ISMAIL, Abdul Ghafar (Islamic Financial Economics, Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia)
TOHIRIN, Achmad (Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia)
SRIYANA, Jaka (Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.12, 2020 , pp. 1053-1064 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to determine the perceptions of Islamic Financial Cooperative (BMT) managers in the Indonesian BMT Association on the acceptance of core banking technology. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is used because it has simple theoretical characteristics (parsimony) and is supported by data (verifiability). This study develops the TAM model by integrating new variables -perceptions of maqashid sharia, perceptions of economies of scale, perceptions of market structure, and perceptions of technology procurement costs. These new variables are used to measure intention in using technology and actual usage in BMT operations. This study used PLS-SEM with smartPLS 3. The study was conducted in Central Java in six ex-Residency at 35 BMT with 300 respondents consisting of six levels of position level. The research found that maqashid sharia and market structure directly influenced the intention of BMT managers in using core banking technology. This new finding strengthens a theoretical model regarding the role of maqashid sharia in the acceptance of information technology in BMT. In addition, the perception of economies of scale has no significant effect on intention in using technology or its actual usage. The perception variable of technology procurement costs was found to have no significant effect on intention in using technology.
Keywords
Maqasid Sharia; BMT; Islamic Microfinance; Market Structure; Technology Acceptance Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aivazian, V. A., Callen, J. L., Chan, M. W. L., & Mountain, D. C. (2013). Economies of Scale Versus Technological Change in the Natural Gas Transmission Industry. Journal The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 556-561.
2 Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 53(1), 51-58.
3 Al-Somali, S. A., Gholami, R., & Clegg, B. (2009). An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation, 29(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.004   DOI
4 Bashir, I., & Madhavaiah, C. (2015). Trust, Social Influence, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Risk, and Internet Banking Acceptance: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model in Indian Context. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 14(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622520150105   DOI
5 Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., & Hague, R. (2016). The cost of additive manufacturing: Machine productivity, economies of scale, and technology-push. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015   DOI
6 Bessen, J. (2002). Technology adoption costs and productivity growth: The transition to information technology. Journal of Economic Literature, 5(2), 443-469. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.2001.0152   DOI
7 Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., Nusair, K. K., & Kwun, D. J. W. (2011). Information technology applications and competitive advantage in hotel companies. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/17579881111154245   DOI
8 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
9 Chin, W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), Vii-Xvi. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/249674
10 Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008   DOI
11 Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development : A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x   DOI
12 Elberfeld, W., & Gotz, G. (2002). Market size, technology choice, and market structure. German Economic Review, 3(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0475.00050   DOI
13 Gold, A. H., & Arvind Malhotra, A. H. S. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.   DOI
14 Flor, C. R., & Hansen, S. L. (2013). Technological advances and the decision to invest. Ann Finance, 9(3), 383-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-012-0191-4   DOI
15 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382-388.
16 Furst, K., Lang, W. W., & Nolle, D. E. (2002). Internet banking. Journal of Financial Services Research, 22(1-2), 95-117.   DOI
17 Hair, Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18 Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). SEM: An introduction. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, 5(6), 629-686.
19 Hair, Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.   DOI
20 Hannan, T. H., & Mcdowell, J. M. (2014). The Impact of Technology Adoption on Market Structure. The Review of Economics Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 164-168.   DOI
21 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. University of Massachusetts Amherst
22 Hudaefi, F. A., & Noordin, K. (2019). Harmonizing and constructing an integrated maqasid al- Shariah index for measuring the performance of Islamic banks. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijif-01-2018-0003   DOI
23 Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 43(1), 115.   DOI
24 Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(1), 277-319.   DOI
25 Huda, M. Q., Hidayah, N. A., & Putra, S. J. (2016). A study of social technology use in State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. In: Cyber and IT Service Management, International Conference (pp. 1-6).
26 Istijanto, (2009). Practical Applications of Marketing Research. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
27 Kumar, G., & Shenbagaraman, V. M. (2017). The customers' perception of mobile banking adoption in Chennai City. An empirical assessment of an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 26(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2017.086056   DOI
28 Lee, J. W., Becker, K., & Potluri, R. M. (2018). Antecedents of Corporate Adoption of Social Media and the Role of the Technology Acceptance Model in the Path. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(2), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2016.vol3.no2.67.   DOI
29 Lien, N. T. K., Doan, T. R. T., & Bui, T. N. (2020). Fintech and banking: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.419   DOI
30 Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1999.772658
31 Mitchell, M. F. (2002). Technological change and the scale of production. Journal of Economic Literature, 5(2), 477-488. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.2002.0171   DOI
32 Muafi, M. (2003). The Effect of Employee Spiritual Motivation on Religious Performance: An Empirical Study in the Rungkut Industrial Area, Surabaya. Journal of Siasat Bisnis, 1(8), 1.   DOI
33 Rahi, S. (2017). Predicting customer's intentions to use internet banking: the role of technology acceptance model (TAM) in e-banking. Management Science Letters, 7, 513-524. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2017.8.004   DOI
34 Rahmawati, A. (2012). Behavior Model of Internet Banking Acceptance in Islamic Banks: The Role of Spiritual Motivation. Sunan Ampel Islamic University. Retrieved December 18, 2019 from http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/7660
35 Rangkuti, F. (2005). SWOT Analysis of Business Concept Mechanism Techniques. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
36 Rifai, S., Asakdiyah, S., & Setyawan, R. R. (2019). Analysis of Acceptance of Banking System Based on Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model in Sharia Rural Bank of Bangun Drajat Warga at Yogyakarta Indonesia. Perisai : Islamic Banking and Finance Journal, 3(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.21070/perisai.v3i1.2102   DOI
37 Rizky, S. (2017). Islamic Maqashid Application in the Field of Islamic Banking. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 1(2), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004   DOI
38 Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J. H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: a software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(3), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3   DOI
39 Saji, T. G., & Paul, D. (2018). Behavioral Intention to the Use of Mobile Banking in Kerala: An Application of Extended Classical Technology Acceptance Model. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 17(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622518792802   DOI
40 Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170   DOI
41 Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
42 Suseno P. (2008). Analysis of efficiency and economies of scale in the Islamic banking industry in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic and Economics, 2 (1), 35-55
43 Sutton, J, (2001). Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History. Cambride, MA: MIT Press
44 Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., & Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537-547. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.537   DOI
45 Tangke, N. (2004). Acceptance Analysis of the Application of Computer Assisted Audit Techniques Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) at the Indonesian Financial Audit Board. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 6(1), Mei: 10-28.
46 Weeds, H. (2012). Superstars and the long tail: The impact of technology on the market structure in media industries. Information Economics and Policy, 24(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.01.008   DOI
47 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.   DOI