Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.1097

Political Connections and CSR Disclosures in Indonesia  

SARASWATI, Erwin (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Brawijaya)
SAGITAPUTRI, Ananda (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Brawijaya)
RAHADIAN, Yan (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Brawijaya)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.11, 2020 , pp. 1097-1104 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research seeks to provide evidence about how political connections, proxied by government ownership and the existence of politically connected board members, affect the extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures in Indonesian listed companies. This research uses the legitimacy theory as a basis for explaining management's motivation for disclosing its CSR. The sample consists of 131 firm-year observations from 38 non-financial public companies that published sustainability reports from 2013 to 2017. We measured the CSR disclosures using a disclosure checklist on the sustainability reports. We subsequently processed the data using a random effect (RE) linear regression. The result shows that CSR disclosures were greater in government-owned companies but lower in companies that have politically connected board members. The results support the legitimacy theory that the government intends to demonstrate legitimate national economic and political conditions by showing that government-owned companies are sustainable. However, CSR disclosures seem to have a substitutive relationship with the existence of politically connected board members, since those political connections may protect the company from public pressure and/or the risk of litigation, reducing the need for CSR disclosures. This research provides evidence that different types of political connections may have different impacts on corporate disclosures.
Keywords
CSR; Government Ownership; Political Connection; Sustainability; Social Responsibility;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Alotaibi, K. O., & Hussainey, K. (2016). Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 13(4), 364-393. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2016.2   DOI
2 Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(6), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.003   DOI
3 Cai, Y., Pan, C. H., & Statman, M. (2016). Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 591-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.09.004   DOI
4 CSR Netherlands. (2016). Country scan CSR in Indonesia. Retrieved February 20, 2019 from http://indodutchmaritimesecretariat.com/download/5/
5 Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983 to1997. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861   DOI
6 Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 439-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1209-6   DOI
7 Ernst & Young. (2017). Sustainability reporting: Key insights from the Indonesian Stock Exchange Top 100. Retrieved January 14, 2019 from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_Value_of_Sustainability_Reporting/%24File/EYSustainability.pdf
8 Deegan, C., & Unerman, J. (2008). Financial Accounting Theory. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
9 Dicko, S., Khemakhem, H., & Zogning, F. (2019). Political connections and voluntary disclosure: the case of Canadian listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(2), 481-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09471-3
10 Dieleman, M., & Widjaja, H. (2018). How powerful political ties appropriate resources and how weaker organizations protect themselves: A case study from Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36, 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9563-2   DOI
11 Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704   DOI
12 Faisal, F., Situmorang, L. S., Achmad, T., & Prastiwi, A. (2020). The role of government regulations in enhancing corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm value. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.509   DOI
13 Gamerschlag, R., Moller, K., & Verbeteen, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure : empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5, 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3   DOI
14 Gantyowati, E., & Agustine, K. F. (2017). Firm's Characteristics and CSR Disclosure , Indonesia and Malaysia Cases. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(3), 131-145.
15 Hung, M., Kim, Y., & Li, S. (2018). Political connections and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3), 272-302. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0139-z   DOI
16 Ghazali, N. A. M. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710756535   DOI
17 Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S., (1995). Longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163809   DOI
18 Griffin, P. A., & Sun, Y. (2013). Strange bedfellows? Voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure and politics. Accounting and Finance, 53, 867-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12033   DOI
19 Gunawan, J. (2010). Perception of important information in corporate social disclosures: evidence from Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011024559   DOI
20 Habib, A., & Muhammadi, A. H. (2018). Political connections and audit report lag: Indonesian evidence. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 26(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2016-0086   DOI
21 Jahid, A., Rashid, H. U., Hossain, S. Z., Haryono, S., & Jatmiko, B. (2020). Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure of publicly-listed banks in Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.061   DOI
22 Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper Presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.
23 Nguyen, T. L. H., Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, T. T. H., Le, T. H. A., & Nguyen, V. C. (2020). The determinants of environmental information disclosure in Vietnam the determinants of environmental information disclosure in Vietnam listed companies. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.21   DOI
24 Makhija, A. K., & Patton, J. M. (2004). The impact of firm ownership structure on voluntary disclosure: Empirical evidence from Czech annual reports. The Journal of Business, 77(3), 457-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/386526   DOI
25 Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837   DOI
26 Muttakin, M. B., & Khan, A. (2014). Advances in accounting, incorporating advances in international accounting determinants of corporate social disclosure: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Cardiology, 30(1), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2014.03.005
27 Muttakin, M. B., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm ownership and board characteristics: Do they matter for corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian companies? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 138-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2013-0042   DOI
28 Muttakin, M. B., Mihret, D. G., & Khan, A. (2018). Corporate political connection and corporate social responsibility disclosures: A neo-pluralist hypothesis and empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31(2), 725-744. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2078   DOI
29 Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
30 Sahut, J. M., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Teulon, F. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(4), 901-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09472-2   DOI
31 Shahab, Y., & Ye, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 15(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-018-0038-y   DOI
32 Siregar, S. V., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting : empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391011072435   DOI
33 Wong, W. Y., & Hooy, C. W. (2018). Do types of political connection affect firm performance differently? Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 51(July), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.08.009   DOI