Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.24304/kjcp.2019.29.2.89

Validation of Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Voriconazole alone for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis  

Son, Yu Jeong (Department of Pharmacy, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Lee, Kyung A (Department of Pharmacy, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Jo, Ju Hee (Department of Pharmacy, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Kim, Jae Song (Department of Pharmacy, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Son, Eun Sun (Department of Pharmacy, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Park, Moo Suk (Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / v.29, no.2, 2019 , pp. 89-100 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly among immunocompromised patients, such as lung transplant recipients. Voriconazole, the first-line therapy for IA, shows a non-linear pharmacokinetic profile and has a narrow therapeutic range. Careful and appropriate administration is necessary, primarily because it is used for critically ill patients; however, the clinical usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has not been sufficiently verified. Therefore, in this study, we validated the safety and efficacy of voriconazole TDM in lung transplant recipients receiving only voriconazole for IA treatment. Methods: The electronic medical records of lung transplant recipients (${\geq}19$ years of age) administered only voriconazole for > 7 days for treatment of IA from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Among the 54 patients, 27 each were allocated to TDM and non-TDM groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups except for ICU-hospitalization status. Of the TDM group patients, 81.5% needed adjustment of voriconazole dosage because the levels were out of target range. Comparison of two groups showed that treatment response was higher throughout treatment and switching rates of second-line agents were significantly lower in the TDM group, but it was insufficient to confirm safety improvements through voriconazole TDM. Conclusions: Considering that the treatment response tended to be higher and the rates of switching to second-line antifungal agents were lower in the TDM group, voriconazole TDM may increase the therapeutic effect on IA in lung transplant patients.
Keywords
Voriconazole; invasive aspergillosis; lung transplantation; therapeutic drug monitoring;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Badiee P and Hashemizadeh Z. Opportunistic invasive fungal infections: diagnosis & clinical management. Indian J Med Res 2014;139(2):195-204.
2 Maschmeyer G, Haas A, Cornely OA. Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management in immunocompromised patients. Drugs 2007;67(11):1567-601.   DOI
3 Gavalda J, Meije Y, Fortun J, et al. Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20 Suppl 7:27-48.   DOI
4 Mitsani D, Nguyen MH, Shields RK, et al. Prospective, observational study of voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring among lung transplant recipients receiving prophylaxis: factors impacting levels of and associations between serum troughs, efficacy, and toxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56(5):2371-7.   DOI
5 Morgan J, Wannemuehler KA, Marr KA, et al. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis following hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation: interim results of a prospective multicenter surveillance program. Med Mycol 2005;43Suppl 1:S49-58.   DOI
6 Lin SJ, Schranz J, Teutsch SM. Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systematic review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32(3):358-66.   DOI
7 Patterson TF, Thompson GR, 3rd, Denning DW, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63(4):e1-e60.   DOI
8 Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S, et al. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24Suppl 1:e1-e38.
9 Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, et al. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(6): 408-15.   DOI
10 Lat A and Thompson GR, 3rd. Update on the optimal use of voriconazole for invasive fungal infections. Infect Drug Resist 2011;4:43-53.   DOI
11 Kim SI and Kang MWJI. Current usage and prospect of new antifungal agents in Korea. Infect Chemother 2010;42(4):209-15.   DOI
12 Theuretzbacher U, Ihle F, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of voriconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 2006;45(7):649-63.   DOI
13 Andes D, Pascual A, Marchetti O. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53(1):24-34.   DOI
14 Hashemizadeh Z, Badiee P, Malekhoseini SA, et al. Observational Study of Associations between Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Toxicity, and Outcome in Liver Transplant Patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;61(12).
15 Park WB, Kim NH, Kim KH, et al. The effect of therapeutic drug monitoring on safety and efficacy of voriconazole in invasive fungal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(8):1080-7.   DOI
16 Han K, Capitano B, Bies R, et al. Bioavailability and population pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in lung transplant recipients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54(10):4424-31.   DOI
17 Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, et al. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34(5):563-71.   DOI
18 Chu HY, Jain R, Xie H, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: retrospective cohort study of the relationship to clinical outcomes and adverse events. BMC Infectious Diseases 2013;13(1):105.   DOI
19 Pascual A, Csajka C, Buclin T, et al. Challenging recommended oral and intravenous voriconazole doses for improved efficacy and safety: population pharmacokinetics-based analysis of adult patients with invasive fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(3):381-90.   DOI
20 De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46(12):1813-21.   DOI
21 Hamada Y, Tokimatsu I, Mikamo H, et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J Infect Chemother 2013;19(3):381-92.   DOI
22 Dou YH, Du JK, Liu HL, et al. The role of procalcitonin in the identification of invasive fungal infection-a systemic review and meta-analysis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2013;76(4):464-9.   DOI
23 Cornely OA, Koehler P, Arenz D, et al. EQUAL Aspergillosis Score 2018: An ECMM score derived from current guidelines to measure QUALity of the clinical management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 2018;61(11):833-6.   DOI
24 Zhou W, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Diagnostic Value of Galactomannan Antigen Test in Serum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Samples from Patients with Nonneutropenic Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55(7):2153-61.   DOI
25 Segal BH, Herbrecht R, Stevens DA, et al. Defining responses to therapy and study outcomes in clinical trials of invasive fungal diseases: Mycoses Study Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus criteria. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47(5):674-83.   DOI
26 Snyder LD and Palmer SM. Immune mechanisms of lung allograft rejection. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2006;27(5):534-43.   DOI