Browse > Article

SUTURE TECHNIQUE FOR SUCCESSFUL GUIDED BONE REGENERATION ; PRELIMINARY REPORT OF DOUBLE LAYERED SUTURE TECHNIQUE WITH SUBGINGIVAL SUTURE  

Kim, Young-Bin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Cho, Sung-Dae (Department of Oral Pathology, School of dentistry, Chonbuk National University. Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University)
Leem, Dae-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.31, no.1, 2009 , pp. 86-91 More about this Journal
Abstract
The success of implants essentially depends on a sufficient volume of healthy bone at the recipient site during implant placement. In patients who have the severe alveolar bone resorption or pneumatized maxillary sinus, it should be performed that bone regeneration procedure before implant placement. Development of barrier membrane makes it possible that predictable result of alveolar bone reconstruction. Many kind of materials used for barrier membrane technique are introduced, non-absorbable or absorbable membranes. But, when operation site was ruptured with membrane exposure, bacterias can be grow up at the bone graft site. Then morphology and migration of fibroblast will be changed. It works as a negative factor on healing process of bone graft site. In oral and maxillofacial department of Chonbuk national university dental hospital, we use variable suture technique like as subgingival suture, vertical mattress suture, simple interrupted suture, if need, tenting suture after GBR or block bone graft. Within these suture technique, wound healing was excellent without complication, so now we take a report of suture technique in reconstruction of alveolar bone surgery.
Keywords
Double layered suture; Subgingival suture; Guided bone regeneration; Suture technique;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fiorellini JP, Kim DM, Nakajima Y : Osseointergration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytertafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 27 : 287, 2007
2 Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker B et al : The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets ; A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9 : 31, 1994
3 Becker WD, Leckholm Dahlin et al : The effect of clinical loading on bone regenerated by GTAM barriers: A study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9: 305, 1994
4 Watzinger F, Luksch J, Milles L et al: Guided bone regeneration with titanium membranes: a clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Sur 38: 312, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL et al : Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development; a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 74 : 990, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U et al: Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique; An experimental study in Rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillfac Implants 4: 19, 1989
7 Kim BO: Implant treatment and guided bony regeneration. J Korean Dental Association 39: 819, 2001
8 Klokkevold PR, Newman MG: Current status of dental implants: A periodontal perspective. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(1) : 56, 2000
9 Selvig KA: Scanning electron microscopic observation of cell populations and bacterial contamination of membranes used for guided periodontal tissue regeneration in humans. J periodontal 61: 515, 1990   DOI
10 Arora BK, Worley M, Guttu RL et al : Bone formation over partially exposed implants using guided tissue regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50: 1060, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fritz ME : Clinical and microbiological opbservations of early PTFE membrane exposure in GBR ; Case reports in primates. J periodontol 67 : 245, 1996   DOI
12 Yumet JA: Gingival wound healing in the presevce of plaque-induced inflammation. J periodontal 56: 107, 1985   DOI
13 Gotfredsen K, Warrer K, Hortin-Hansen E et al: Effect of membranes and porous hydroxylapatite on healing in bone defects around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2: 172, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T: Reattachment-New attachment. in Lindhe J(ed): Textbook of Clinical Periodontology, Cophenhagen, Denmark, Munskgaard, 1988, p. 409
15 Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Becker W et al: Treatment of fenestration and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using guided tissue regeneration technique: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10: 312, 1995
16 Ling LJ, Hung SL, Lee CF et al: The influence of membrane exposure on the outcomes of guided tissue regeneration; Clinical and microbiological aspects. J periodontal Res 38 : 57, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hockers T, Abensur D, Valentini P et al: The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants: A study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 10: 487, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Anderson D: Calcium sulfate: A 4-year observation of its use as a resorbable barrier in GTR of periodontal defects. Compend Contin Educ Dent 17: 895, 1996