Browse > Article

THE EFFECT OF REPETITIVE DISTRACTION AND COMPRESSION ON NEW BONE FORMATION DURING DISTRACTION  

Yoon, Byung-Wook (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung-Hee University Dental School)
Kim, Yeo-Gab (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung-Hee University Dental School)
Oh, Jung-Hwan (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung-Hee University Dental School)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.30, no.5, 2008 , pp. 407-416 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of repetitive distraction and compression on new bone formation during distraction period. Materials and methods: Sixteen healthy rabbits, weighing about 2.5kg, were used in this experiment. A unilateral mandibular osteotomy was performed in the left mandible and the distractor(Track 1 $plus^{(R)}$, Gebruder Martin $GmbH^{(R)}$, Germany) was fixed with four screws (Cross driver screw $TI^{(R)}$, Gebruder Martin $GmbH^{(R)}$, Germany). After 4 days, the mandibles were distracted at a rate of 0.6mm/day for 10 days to obtain the amount of 6mm distraction in the control group(n=4). In the experimental group A(n=6), they were distracted at a rate of 1.2mm/day for 5 days and then compression of 0.6mm length and distraction of 0.6mm per 12 hours were carried out as counter direction for 5 days, relatively. In the experimental group B(n=6), distraction of 1.2mm length and compression of 0.6mm length per 12 hours were repeated for 10 days to obtain the amount of 6mm distraction finally. The experimental animals were sacrificed at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery and block specimens were obtained. With histologic and histomorphometric analysis, we observed the histologic changes of the cells and bone formation after H-E and Masson- Trichrome staining and then, measured Bone Deposition Rate with TOMORO $ScopeEye^{TM}$ ver. 3.5(Olympus, Japan), Results: Histologically, new bone formation was examined in all experimental groups and the control. But, the ability of bone formation of the experimental group A was somewhat better than any other groups. On the histomorphometric analysis, Bone Deposition Rate was higher in the experimental group A$(50.67{\pm}4.36%)$ than in the control group$(45.94{\pm}3.97%)$ and in the experimental group B$(42.68{\pm}5.70%)$. These data showed significant differences statistically(p<0.05). Conclusion: These results show that the distraction osteogenesis using repetitive compression and distraction force in the early consolidation period may be effective for new bone formation.
Keywords
Distraction osteogenesis; Repetitive distraction and compression; Bone deposition rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kwon JK, Park HJ, Ryu SY : The effect of oscillating distraction osteogenesis on new bone formation during mendibulat distraction period in rabbits. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 : 241, 2006   과학기술학회마을
2 Aida T, Yoshioka I, Tominaga K et al : Effects of latency period in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 : 54, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Tavakoli K, Walsh WR, Bonar F et al : The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26 : 209, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Nash TJ, Howlett CR, Martin C et al : Effect of plateletderived growth factor on tibial osteotomies in rabbits. Bone 15 : 203, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Yonezawa H, Harada K, Ikebe T et al : Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) on bone consolidation on distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in rabbit mandibles. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34 : 270, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Whong YS, Heo Jm Kim UK et al : Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with compression force. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 28 : 531, 2006   과학기술학회마을
7 Kitoh H, Kitakoji T, Tsuchiya H et al : Transplantation of culture expanded bone marrow cells and platelet rich plasma in distraction osteogenesis of the long bones. Bone 40 : 522, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Tsubota S, Tsuchiya H, Shinokawa Y et al : Transplantation of osteoblast-like cells to the distracted callus in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 : 125, 1999   DOI
9 Farhadieh RD, Dickinson R, Yu Y et al : The role of transforming growth factor-beta, insulin-like growth factor I, and basic fibroblast growth factor in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J Craniofac Surg 10 : 80, 1999   DOI
10 Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H, Aoyama I et al : Stimulation of bone formation by intraosseous application of recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor in normal and ovariectomized rabbits. J Orthop Res 15 : 307, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lee BS, Jeon JH, Kim YG et al : Le Fort 3 distraction osteogenesis for treatment of midfacial hypoplasia: a case report. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 26 : 598, 2004
12 Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH et al : Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 : 507, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Mofid MM, Inoue N, Atabey A et al : Callus stimulation in distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 109 : 1621, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Pampu AA, Dolanmaz D, Tuz HH et al : Experimental evaluation of the effects of zoledronic acid on regenerate bone formation and osteoporosis in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 : 1232, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Fredericks DC, Piehl DJ, Baker JT et al : Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit tibial leg lengthening model. J Pediatr Orthop 23 : 478, 2003   DOI
16 Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239 : 263, 1989   PUBMED
17 Ayoub AF, Richardson W, Koppel D et al : Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39 : 356, 2001   DOI
18 Davies J, Turner S, Sandy J : Distraction osteogenesis - a review. Br Dent J 185 : 462, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Hosny G, Shawky MS : The treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia by compression-distraction techniques using the Ilizarov external fixator. Int Orthop 22 : 298, 1998   DOI
20 Kim UK, Chung IK, Lee KH et al : Bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis combined with compression stimulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 : 1498, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Amaral CM, Di Domizio G, Tiziani V et al : Gradual bone distraction in craniosynostosis. Preliminary results in seven cases. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 31 : 25, 1997   DOI
22 Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J, Veldhuijzen JP : Mechanical stress and osteogenesis in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 7 : S397, 1992   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
23 Oh JH, Frank L, Zoeller JE : Vertical distraction of alveolar bone for placement of dental implant. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 : 326, 2002
24 Uglow MG, Peat RA, Hile MS et al : Low-intensity ultrasound stimulation in distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 : 303, 2003   PUBMED
25 Greenwald JA, Luchs JS, Mehrara BJ et al : 'Pumping the regenerate': an evaluation of oscillating distraction osteogenesis in the rodent mandible. Ann Plast Surg 44 : 516, 2000   DOI
26 Takenobu T, Nagano M, Taniike N et al : Mandibular reconstruction using intraoral trifocal bone transport: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 : 630, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ilizarov GA : Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250 : 8, 1990   PUBMED
28 Jang GT, Oh JH, Kim YG : Original Articles : Effect of Latency Period And Direction of Distraction on the New Bone Formation During Distraction Osteogenesis. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 26 : 511, 2004
29 Stokes IA, Clark KC, Farnum CE et al : Alterations in the growth plate associated with growth modulation by sustained compression or distraction. Bone 41 : 197, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Hollier LH Jr., Higuera S, Stal S et al : Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of pediatric mandibular distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117 : 2333, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Kassis B, Glorion C, Tabib W et al : Callus response to micromovement during elongation in the rabbit. J Pediatr Orthop 18 : 586, 1998   DOI
32 Kershaw CJ, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J : Tibial external fixation, weight bearing, and fracture movement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 293 : 28, 1993   PUBMED
33 White SH, Kenwright J : The timing of distraction of an osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 : 356, 1990   PUBMED
34 De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi BL : The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66 : 538, 1984   PUBMED
35 Aronson J : Temporal and spatial increases in blood flow during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301 : 124, 1994   PUBMED
36 McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N et al : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992   DOI
37 Kim UK, Shin SH, Jung IK et al : Tissue reaction following by combination of distraction and compression force on distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in the rat. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 : 103, 2002   과학기술학회마을
38 Kojimoto H, Yasui N, Goto T et al : Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of periosteum and endosteum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 : 543, 1988   PUBMED
39 Narasaki K, Shimizu H, Beppu M et al : Effect of extracorporeal shock waves on callus formation during bone lengthening. J Orthop Sci 8 : 474, 2003   DOI
40 Yamaji T, Ando K, Wolf S et al : The effect of micromovement on callus formation. J Orthop Sci 6 : 571, 2001   DOI
41 Okazaki H, Kurokawa T, Nakamura K et al : Stimulation of bone formation by recombinant fibroblast growth factor- 2 in callotasis bone lengthening of rabbits. Calcif Tissue Int 64 : 542, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Kokoroghiannis C, Papaioannou N, Lyritis G et al : Calcitonin administration in a rabbit distraction osteogenesis model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415 : 286, 2003   DOI