1 |
Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 714-735.
DOI
|
2 |
Altmann, G. T. M., van Nice, K., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 459-484.
DOI
|
3 |
Carlson, K., Clifton, Jr., C, & Frazier, L. (2001). Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 58-81.
DOI
|
4 |
Cooper, W., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
5 |
Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
|
6 |
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D., (1978). The sausage machine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-325.
DOI
|
7 |
Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.
DOI
|
8 |
Gibson, E. A. F. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
|
9 |
Jeon, Y.-S. (2011). Durational Pattern and Syntactic Structure in Non-native English. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 19, 191-207.
|
10 |
Jun, S.-A. (1998). The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15, 189-226.
DOI
|
11 |
Jun, S.-A. (2003). Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 219-249.
DOI
|
12 |
Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194-231.
DOI
|
13 |
Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 197-222.
|
14 |
Lehiste, I., Olive, J. P., & Streeter, L. (1976). Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199-1202.
DOI
|
15 |
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312.
DOI
|
16 |
Millotte, S., Wales, R., & Christophe, A. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 898-909.
DOI
|
17 |
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
|
18 |
Payne, T. (2006). Exploring language structure: A student's guide. Cambridge University Press.
|
19 |
Price, P., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956-2970.
DOI
|
20 |
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374.
DOI
|
21 |
Schafer, A. J., & Jun, S.-A. (2001). Effects of focus on prosodic reflections of phrase structure in American English. Paper presented at the Prosody in Processing Workshop, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
|
22 |
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 193-247.
DOI
|
23 |
Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., & Warren, P. (2005). Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task. In M. K. Tanenhaus & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Approaches to studying world situated language use (pp. 209-225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
24 |
Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-405.
DOI
|
25 |
Selkirk, E. O. (2002). Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on speech prosody (pp. 643-646). Aix-en-Provence, France.
|
26 |
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103-130.
DOI
|
27 |
Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K.(1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1521-1543.
DOI
|
28 |
Strangert, E. (2003). Emphasis by pausing. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 2477-2480). Barcelona, Spain.
|
29 |
Tanenhaus, M., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Speech language and communication. Volume 11 of the handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
|
30 |
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
DOI
|
31 |
Turk, A. E., & White, L. S. (1999). Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 171-206.
DOI
|
32 |
Wales, R., & Toner, H. (1979). Intonation and ambiguity. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 135-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
33 |
Wanner, E. (1980). The ATN and the sausage machine: Which one is baloney? Cognition, 8, 209-225.
DOI
|