Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.3.055

The Effect of Interpretation Bias on the Production of Disambiguating Prosody  

Choe, Wook Kyung (Dong-A University)
Redford, Melissa A (University of Oregon)
Publication Information
Phonetics and Speech Sciences / v.7, no.3, 2015 , pp. 55-64 More about this Journal
Abstract
Previous research on syntactic processing shows that the interpretation of a syntactically ambiguous sentence is frequently strongly biased towards one meaning over another. The current study investigated the effect of bias strength on the production of disambiguating prosody for English ambiguous sentences. In Experiment 1, 40 speakers gave default readings of 18 syntactically ambiguous sentences. Questioning was used to prove intended meanings behind default readings. Intended meanings were treated as interpretation biases when a majority of speakers read a sentence with the same intended meaning. The size of the majority was used to establish bias strength. In Experiment 2, 10 speakers were instructed to use prosody to disambiguate given alternate meanings of the sentences from Experiment 1. The results indicated an effect of bias strength on disambiguating prosody: speakers used temporal juncture cues to reliably disambiguate alternate meanings for sentences with a weak interpretation bias, but not for those with a strong bias. Overall, the results indicated that interpretation biases strongly affect the production of prosody.
Keywords
prosody; disambiguation; interpretation bias; interpretation bias strength; syntactic ambiguity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 714-735.   DOI
2 Altmann, G. T. M., van Nice, K., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 459-484.   DOI
3 Carlson, K., Clifton, Jr., C, & Frazier, L. (2001). Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 58-81.   DOI
4 Cooper, W., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5 Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
6 Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D., (1978). The sausage machine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-325.   DOI
7 Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.   DOI
8 Gibson, E. A. F. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
9 Jeon, Y.-S. (2011). Durational Pattern and Syntactic Structure in Non-native English. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 19, 191-207.
10 Jun, S.-A. (1998). The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15, 189-226.   DOI
11 Jun, S.-A. (2003). Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 219-249.   DOI
12 Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194-231.   DOI
13 Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 197-222.
14 Lehiste, I., Olive, J. P., & Streeter, L. (1976). Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199-1202.   DOI
15 McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312.   DOI
16 Millotte, S., Wales, R., & Christophe, A. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 898-909.   DOI
17 Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
18 Payne, T. (2006). Exploring language structure: A student's guide. Cambridge University Press.
19 Price, P., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956-2970.   DOI
20 Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374.   DOI
21 Schafer, A. J., & Jun, S.-A. (2001). Effects of focus on prosodic reflections of phrase structure in American English. Paper presented at the Prosody in Processing Workshop, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
22 Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 193-247.   DOI
23 Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., & Warren, P. (2005). Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task. In M. K. Tanenhaus & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Approaches to studying world situated language use (pp. 209-225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24 Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-405.   DOI
25 Selkirk, E. O. (2002). Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on speech prosody (pp. 643-646). Aix-en-Provence, France.
26 Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103-130.   DOI
27 Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K.(1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1521-1543.   DOI
28 Strangert, E. (2003). Emphasis by pausing. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 2477-2480). Barcelona, Spain.
29 Tanenhaus, M., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Speech language and communication. Volume 11 of the handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30 Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.   DOI
31 Turk, A. E., & White, L. S. (1999). Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 171-206.   DOI
32 Wales, R., & Toner, H. (1979). Intonation and ambiguity. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 135-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33 Wanner, E. (1980). The ATN and the sausage machine: Which one is baloney? Cognition, 8, 209-225.   DOI