Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2022.12.38.4.199

Analysis of Important of Port Selection Factors to Attract Shippers for Mokpo New Port  

Son, Yoomi (목포해양대학교 해상운송시스템학과)
Kim, Jihyun (목포해양대학교 해상운송시스템학과 )
Lee, Kyongseok (목포해양대학교 해상운송시스템학과)
Kim, Hwayoung (목포해양대학교 해상운송학부 )
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Port Economic Association / v.38, no.4, 2022 , pp. 199-214 More about this Journal
Abstract
A relative important analysis was conducted to determine what factors are required for port selection in Mokpo New Port and what needs to be addressed first in order to expand automobile and steel cargo handling. The port selection factors of Mokpo New Port were classified into 4 major and 13 intermediate categories, and AHP analysis was used. As a result, items such as 'port facilities', 'accessibility to international ports', 'port facility usage fees', and 'connectivity with neighboring cities/ports' were evaluated as important. The respondent groups were divided into shipowner and shipper, port operator and stevedore, and public official, and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to verify if there was a difference in perception between the groups. As a result, shipowner and shipper, port operator and stevedore were similar, but there was a difference from public official group. Shipowner and shipper, port operator and stevedore with similar response characteristics were classified into the 'port practitioner' group, and public official were classified into the 'port policy maker' group, and the difference in perception between the group was tested. Therefore, there were differences in some major category items, and even in the intermediate category items such as 'possession of adjacent hinterland industrial complex', 'cargo equipment', '24-hour port operation', 'inland transportation cost', 'accessibility to international ports', 'marketing and incentives' with statistical. In other words, the 'port practitioner' group evaluated items that can increase cargo creation and handling productivity as important whereas the 'port policy maker' group considers port development and policies such as port infrastructure, connectivity with other ports, and incentive support items are more important.
Keywords
Port Selection Factors; AHP; Mokpo New Port; ANOVA; t-test;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 목포지방해양수산청(2020), 항만정보, 목포항 소개.
2 박계각.최경훈.이청환(2018), 목포항 비경쟁 요인 분석 및 개선방안 연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제34권 제3호, 113-132.
3 오가영.최경숙.김정순(2009), 소규모 항만 선택의 장애요인에 관한 연구, 물류학회지, 제19권 제5호, 81-102.
4 오현민.이향숙.윤경준(2021), AHP 분석을 통한 목포항의 발전전략에 관한 연구, 물류학회지, 제31권 제3호, 59-72.
5 유은희.박홍규(2019), AHP기법을 활용한 중소항만의 경쟁력 강화요인에 관한 연구: 대산항과 평택.당진항의 비교분석을 중심으로, 경영경제연구, 제41권 제1호, 155-183.   DOI
6 이면수.최훈도.임동석.곽규석(2010), 국내 중소형 항만의 경쟁력 확보 방안에 관한 연구 - 전라도 항만을 중심으로-, 한국항해항만학회지, 제34권 제10호, 817-821.   DOI
7 이해찬.정석환.김유나.여기태(2021), Fuzzy-IPA 기법을 활용한 군산항 니즈분석에 관한 연구, 해운물류 연구, 제37권 제4호, 835-868.
8 여기태.이홍걸.오세웅(2004), 중소형항만의 화주유인 증대를 위한 항만선택요소 추출에 관한 연구, 해운물류연구, 제43호.
9 정준식(2015), 항만선택 결정요인분석을 통한 마산항의 인접지역 수출화주 유치방안, 물류학회지, 제25권 제1호, 1-15.
10 추문정.김창수.하민호(2021), 대중무역 측면에서 한국 주요 항만의 경쟁력 분석, 해운물류연구, 제37권 제4호, 885-909.
11 한국은행 목포본부(2013), 최근 목포항 물류 처리 현황 및 시사점.
12 해양수산부(2020), 제4차(2021~2030) 전국 항만 기본계획.
13 해양수산부(2022), 해운항만물류정보시스템, 해운항만통계.