Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.05.021

Novel homogeneous burnable poisons in pressurized water reactor ceramic fuel  

Dodd, Brandon (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University)
Britt, Taylor (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University)
Lloyd, Cody (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University)
Shah, Manit (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University)
Goddard, Braden (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.52, no.12, 2020 , pp. 2874-2879 More about this Journal
Abstract
Due to excess reactivity, fresh nuclear fuel often contains burnable poisons. This research looks at six different burnable poisons and their impacts on reactivity, material attractiveness, and waste management. An MCNP simulation of a PWR fuel pin was performed with a fuel burnup of 60 GWd/MTHM to determine when each burnable poison fuel type would decrease below a k of 1. For determining the plutonium material attractiveness in each burnable poison fuel type, the plutonium isotopic content of the used fuel was evaluated using Bathke's Figure of Merit formula. For the waste management analysis, the thermal output of each burnable poison fuel type was determined through ORIGEN decay simulations at 100 and 300 years after being discharged from the core. The performance of all six burnable poisons varied over the three criteria considered and no single burnable poison performed best in all three considerations.
Keywords
Material attractiveness; Burnable poisons;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 C. Bathke, et al., The attractiveness of materials in advanced nuclear fuel cycles for various proliferation and theft scenarios, Nucl. Technol. 176 (2011) 5-30.
2 A. Massih, Models for MOX Fuel Behaviour, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, 2006 Jan. SKI-R-06/10-SE.
3 D. Campolina, E.F. Faria, A.A.C. Santos, V. Vasconcelos, M.P.V. Franco, M.S. Dias, et al., Parametric study of enriched gadolinium in burnable neutron poison fuel rods for Angra-2, Ann. Nucl. Energy 118 (2018 Aug) 375-380.
4 W. Hu, B. Liu, X. Ouyang, J. Tu, F. Liu, L. Huang, et al., Minor actinide transmutation on PWR burnable poison rods, Ann. Nucl. Energy 77 (2015 Mar) 74-82.
5 W. Lehmann, I. Shapiro, Isotopic composition of boron and its atomic weight, Nature 183 (1959 May) 1324, https://doi.org/10.1038/1831324a0.   DOI
6 U.S. Department of Energy, Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Feb. 2002. DOE/EIS-0250.
7 P. Trinuruk, T. Obara, Particle-type burnable poisons for thorium-based fuel in HTGR, Energy Procedia 71 (2015 May) 22-32.
8 Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel, World nuclear association. http://www.worldnuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/mixedoxide-fuel-mox.aspx. (Accessed 27 October 2018).
9 Nuclear Data Center, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, http://atom.kaeri.re.kr. (Accessed 27 October 2018).
10 A.H. Fadaei, Investigation of burnable poisons effects in reactor core design, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (10) (2011 Oct) 2238-2246.
11 I.L. Simanullang, T. Obara, Burnup performance of a PBR with an accumulative fuel loading scheme utilizing burnable poison particles in UO2 and ROX fuels, Energy Procedia 131 (2017 Dec) 61-68.
12 Westinghouse Electric Corporation, The Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor Nuclear Power Plant, 1984. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
13 Isotopes of the Element Gadolinium, Thomas jefferson national accelerator facility. https://education.jlab.org/itselemental/iso064.html. (Accessed 27 October 2018).
14 B. Goddard, W. Charlton, S. McDeavitt, Development of a real-time detection strategy for process monitoring during nuclear fuel reprocessing using the UREX+3a method, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (11) (2010) 3904-3909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.08.018.   DOI