Browse > Article

Meta-evaluation for Evaluation of Science Gifted Educational Institutions Affiliated with Universities  

Seo, Hae-Ae (Pusan National University)
Jung, Hun-Chul (KAIST)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.18, no.2, 2008 , pp. 313-341 More about this Journal
Abstract
The research attempted to propose directions for improving evaluation of science gifted educational institutions affiliated with universities through its meta-evaluation. A survey questionnaire was developed and responded by 25 representatives of 25 science gifted educational institutions and 9 evaluation committee members in February 2008. According to research results, it was found that reference-criteria and categories for evaluation were abstract and did not reflect varied characteristics of individual institutions. Evaluation of outcomes mainly emphasized student number admitted by science high schools and science gifted school. Evaluation was performed for the sake of judging ranks. In addition, research capacity of institutions was not even considered as an evaluation element. For its improvement, the followings were suggested: First, evaluation should be functioned as consulting. Second, evaluation criteria are presented as concrete as it can be. Third, on-site evaluation should be introduced Fourth, evaluation process and results should be publicized Fifth, satisfaction by student and parents should be also included. Furthermore, exemplary cases of science gifted educational institutions should be identified and rewarded, and their management strategies should be disseminated with other institutions.
Keywords
Evaluation of science gifted educational institutions affiliated with universities; Meta-evaluation; Science gifted education policy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 배호순 (1994). 프로그램평가론. 원미사
2 서혜애, 조석희, 이은아, 한석실, 윤초희 (2003). 영재교육기관 평가체제 개발 연구. 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR2003-27. 서울: 한국교육개발원
3 최돈형, 강완, 손연아, 전영석 (2001). 과학영재교육센터 운영 및 평가 방안 연구. 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR2001-2. 서울: 한국교육개발원
4 Chelimsky, E. (1985) Old patterns and new directions in program evaluatiom, In E. Chelimsky(Ed). Program Bvaluation: patterns and Directions, pp.1-35, Washington, DC: The American Society for Publie Administration
5 이기종, 김기완, 김현민, 권명화, 김진용 (2006). 과학영재교육 성과측정 지표개발 및 적용을 위한 연구. 서울: 한국과학재단
6 교육과학기술부 (2008). 새 정부의 영재교육 정책방향과 현안: 과학영재교육을 중심으로. 2008. 5. 웹페이지 참조
7 The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standard. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
8 김순남 (2000). 대학평가의 메타평가 준거 개발. 교육행정학연구. 24(2). 371-402
9 한국대학교육협의회 (2004). 2004년도 대학종합평가인정제 시행을 위한 대학 종합평가 편람. 서울: 한국대학교육협의회
10 과학기술부.한국과학재단 (2007). 2007 과학영재인력양성사업 Data Book. 서울: 과학기술부.한국과학재단
11 Larson, R., & Berliner, L. (1983). On evaluating evaluations. Pobicy Sciences, 16(2). 147-163   DOI
12 교육인적자원부 (2007). 영재교육 기본 동계 보도자료 2007.7.12. 웹페이지 참조
13 서혜애, 조석희, 김순남, 유길한 (2004). 영재교육기관 평가 모형 현장 평가 연구. 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR2004-42. 서울: 한국교육개발원
14 Stufflebeam, D., Madam, G., & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Bvaluation models (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Pub
15 Cook, T. D., & Gruder, C. L. (1978). Metaevaluation research. Bvaluation Quarterly, 2(1). 5-55   DOI
16 Sanders, J. (1994). The program evaluation standards. London: Sage Pub
17 이광형, 정현철, 심재영 (2007). 전주기적 과학영재발굴.육성제계혁신방안. 2007.01. 서울 KAIST 과학영재교육연구원