1 |
Zhu, W., Xu, K., Darve, E., Biondi, B., and Beroza, G. C., 2022, Integrating deep neural networks with full-waveform inversion: Reparameterization, regularization, and uncertainty quantification, Geophysics, 87(1), R93-R109. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0933.1
DOI
|
2 |
Adler, A., Araya-Polo, M., and Poggio, T., 2019, Deep recurrent architectures for seismic tomography, 81st Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901512
DOI
|
3 |
Al-Chalabi, M., 1974, An analysis of stacking, RMS, average, and interval velocities over a horizontally layered ground, Geophys. Prospect., 22(3), 458-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1974.tb00099.x
DOI
|
4 |
Alkhalifah, T., Song, C., Waheed, U. B., and Hao, Q., 2020, Wavefield solutions from machine learned functions that approximately satisfy the wave equation, 81st Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202010588
DOI
|
5 |
Alterman, Z., and Karal, F. C., 1968, Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite difference methods, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 58, 367-398. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Propagation-of-elastic-waves-in-layered-media-by-Alterman-Karal/fd2895fa7c8fb6221a0e1f25a2a7c1b175c7dc96
|
6 |
Al-Yahya, K., 1989, Velocity analysis by iterative profile migration, Geophysics, 54(6), 718-729. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442699
DOI
|
7 |
Araya-Polo, M., Jennings, J., Adler, A., and Dahlke, T., 2018, Deep-learning tomography, The Leading Edge, 37(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle37010058.1
DOI
|
8 |
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P., 2013, Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 35(8), 1798-1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50
DOI
|
9 |
Biswas, R., Vassiliou, A., Stromberg, R., and Sen, M. K., 2018, Stacking velocity estimation using recurrent neural network, 68th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 2241-2245. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2997208.1
DOI
|
10 |
Bunks, C., Saleck, F. M., Zaleski, S., and Chavent, G., 1995, Multiscale seismic waveform inversion, Geophysics, 60(5), 1457-1473. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443880
DOI
|
11 |
Chopra, S., and Castagna, J. P., 2014, AVO, Society of ExplorationGeophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560803201.refs
DOI
|
12 |
Crase, E., Pica, A., Noble, M., McDonald, J., and Tarantola, A., 1990, Robust elastic nonlinear waveform inversion: Application to real data, Geophysics, 55(5), 527-538. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442864
DOI
|
13 |
Cybenko, G., 1989, Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, Math. Control Signal Syst., 2(4), 303-314. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02551274
DOI
|
14 |
De Souza, L., Desassis, N., Chauris, H., and Hachem, E., 2022, First Steps in the Application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Full Waveform Inversion, 83rd EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition Workshop Programme, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202211045
DOI
|
15 |
Dhara, A., and Sen, M. K., 2022, Physics-guided deep autoencoder to overcome the need for a starting model in full-waveform inversion, The Leading Edge, 41(6), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle41060375.1
DOI
|
16 |
Engquist, B., Froese, B. D., and Yang, Y., 2016, Optimal transport for seismic full waveform inversion, Commun. Math. Sci., 14, 2309-2330. https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2016.v14.n8.a9
DOI
|
17 |
Esser, E., Guasch, L., van Leeuwen, T., Aravkin, A. Y., and Herrmann, F. J., 2018, Total variation regularization strategies in full-waveform inversion, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 11, 376-406. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M111328X
DOI
|
18 |
Fabien-Ouellet, G., and Sarkar, R., 2020, Seismic velocity estimation: A deep recurrent neural-network approach, Geophysics, 85(1), U21-U29. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0786.1
DOI
|
19 |
Ghysels, P., Li, X. S., Rouet, F.-H., Williams, S., and Napov, A., 2016, An efficient multicore implementation of a novel HSS-structured multifrontal solver using randomized sampling, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 38(5), S358-S384. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1010117
DOI
|
20 |
Fang, J., Zhou, H., Elita Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Sun, P., and Zhang, J., 2020, Data-driven low-frequency signal recovery using deep-learning predictions in full-waveform inversion, Geophysics, 85(6), A37-A43. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0159.1
DOI
|
21 |
He, Q., and Wang, Y., 2021, Reparameterized full-waveform inversion using deep neural networks, Geophysics, 86(1), V1-V13. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0382.1
DOI
|
22 |
Herrmann, F. J., Erlangga, Y., and Lin, T. T. Y., 2009, Compressive sensing applied to full-wave form inversion, 71st International Annual Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, S016. https://slim.gatech.edu/content/compressive-sensing-applied-full-waveform-inversion
|
23 |
Hicks, G. J., 2002, Arbitrary source and receiver positioning in finite-difference schemes using Kaiser windowed sinc functions, Geophysics, 67(1), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1451454
DOI
|
24 |
Hornik, K., 1991, Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks, Neural Netw., 4(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T
DOI
|
25 |
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H., 1989, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neural Netw., 2(5), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8
DOI
|
26 |
Huang, G., and Symes, W. W., 2015, Full waveform inversion via matched source extension, 85th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1320-1325. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5872566.1
DOI
|
27 |
Jo, J. H., and Ha, W., 2021, Case analysis of seismic velocity model building using deep neural networks, Geophys. and Geophys. Explor., 24(2), 53-66 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7582/GGE.2021.24.2.53
DOI
|
28 |
Huang, G., Nammour, R., and Symes, W., 2017, Full-waveform inversion via source-receiver extension, Geophysics, 82(3), R153-R171. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0301.1
DOI
|
29 |
Huang, G., Symes, W. W., and Nammour, R., 2016, Matched source waveform inversion: Space-time extension, 86th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1426-1431. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13762051.1
DOI
|
30 |
Hustedt, B., Operto, S., and Virieux, J., 2004, Mixed-grid and staggered-grid finite-difference methods for frequency-domain acoustic wave modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 157(3), 1269-1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02289.x
DOI
|
31 |
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L., 2021, Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys., 3(6), 422-440. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-021-00314-5
DOI
|
32 |
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E., 2017, ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Commun. ACM, 60(6), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
DOI
|
33 |
Lailly, P., 1983, The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations, Conference on Inverse Scattering, Theory and Application, SIAM, Expanded Abstracts, 206-220. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntv-nsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=3108101
|
34 |
Lei, N., An, D., Guo, Y., Su, K., Liu, S., Luo, Z., Yau, S.-T., and Gu, X., 2020, A geometric understanding of deep learning, Engineering, 6(3), 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.09.010
DOI
|
35 |
Liu, B., Yang, S., Ren, Y., Xu, X., Jiang, P., and Chen, Y., 2021, Deep-learning seismic full-waveform inversion for realistic structural modelsDL seismic FWI, Geophysics, 86(1), R31-R44. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0435.1
DOI
|
36 |
Leshno, M., Lin, V. Y., Pinkus, A., and Schocken, S., 1993, Multilayer feedforward networks with a nonpolynomial activation function can approximate any function, Neural netw., 6(6), 861-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80131-5
DOI
|
37 |
Lewis, W., and Vigh, D., 2017, Deep learning prior models from seismic images for full-waveform inversion, 87th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1512-1517. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17627643.1
DOI
|
38 |
Li, S., Liu, B., Ren, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, S., Wang, Y., and Jiang, P., 2020, Deep-Learning Inversion of Seismic Data, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 58(3), 2135-2149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2953473
DOI
|
39 |
Ma, Y., Ji, X., Fei, T. W., and Luo, Y., 2018, Automatic velocity picking with convolutional neural networks, 88th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 2066-2070. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2987088.1
DOI
|
40 |
Metivier, L., Brossier, R., Merigot, Q., Oudet, E., and Virieux, J., 2016, Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: Application to full waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 205, 345-377. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw014
DOI
|
41 |
Mora, P., 1987, Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multi offset seismic data, Geophysics, 52(9), 1211-1228. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442384
DOI
|
42 |
Moseley, B., Markham, A., and Nissen-Meyer, T., 2018, Fast approximate simulation of seismic waves with deep learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06873. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.06873
DOI
|
43 |
Ovcharenko, O., Kazei, V., Kalita, M., Peter, D., and Alkhalifah, T., 2019, Deep learning for low-frequency extrapolation from multioffset seismic data, Geophysics, 84(6), R989-R1001. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0884.1
DOI
|
44 |
Mosser, L., Dubrule, O., and Blunt, M. J., 2020, Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological prior, Math Geosci., 52(1), 53-79. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11004-019-09832-6
DOI
|
45 |
Oord, A. v. d., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K., 2016, Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.03499
DOI
|
46 |
Operto, S., Virieux, J., Dessa, J. X., and Pascal, G., 2006, Crustal imaging from multifold ocean bottom seismometers data by frequency-domain fullwaveform tomography: Application to the eastern Nankai trough, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B09306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003835
DOI
|
47 |
Park, M. J., and Sacchi, M. D., 2020, Automatic velocity analysis using convolutional neural network and transfer learning, Geophysics, 85(1), V33-V43. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0870.1
DOI
|
48 |
Peters, B., and Herrmann, F. J., 2017, Constraints versus penalties for edge preserving full-waveform inversion: The Leading Edge, 36, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36010094.1
DOI
|
49 |
Pica, A., Diet, J., and Tarantola, A., 1990, Nonlinear inversion of seismic reflection data in a laterally invariant medium, Geophysics, 55(3), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442836
DOI
|
50 |
Plessix, R.-E., 2006, A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications, Geophys. J. Int., 167(2), 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x
DOI
|
51 |
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G. E., 2019, Physicsinformed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 378, 686-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
DOI
|
52 |
Plessix, R.-E., 2009, Three-dimensional frequency-domain fullwaveform inversion with an iterative solver, Geophysics, 74(6), WCC149-WCC157. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3211198
DOI
|
53 |
Pratt, R. G., 1999, Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model, Geophysics, 64(3), 888-901. http://seisweb.usask.ca/classes/GEOL898/2020/WWW/Pratt_Geophysics1999.pdf
DOI
|
54 |
Pratt, R. G., Shin, C., and Hick, G., 1998, Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 133(2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00498.x
DOI
|
55 |
Rasht-Behesht, M., Huber, C., Shukla, K., and Karniadakis, G. E., 2022, Physics?Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Wave Propagation and Full Waveform Inversions, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 127(5), e2021JB023120. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023120
DOI
|
56 |
Ren, Y., Xu, X., Yang, S., Nie, L., and Chen, Y., 2020, A physics-based neural-network way to perform seismic full waveform inversion, IEEE Access, 8, 112266-112277. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997921
DOI
|
57 |
Richardson, A., 2018a, Seismic full-waveform inversion using deep learning tools and techniques, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.07232. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.07232
DOI
|
58 |
Richardson, A., 2018b, Generative adversarial networks for model order reduction in seismic full-waveform inversion, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00828. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.00828
DOI
|
59 |
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T., 2015, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 234-241. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
|
60 |
Rickett, J., 2013, The variable projection method for waveform inversion with an unknown source function, Geophys. Prospect., 61(4), 874-881. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12008
DOI
|
61 |
Roth, G., and Tarantola, A., 1994, Neural networks and inversion of seismic data, J. Geophys. Res., 99(B4), 6753-6768. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB01563
DOI
|
62 |
Rouet, F.-H., Li, X. S., Ghysels, P., and Napov, A., 2016, A distributed-memory package for dense hierarchically semiseparable matrix computations using randomization, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 42(4), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930660
DOI
|
63 |
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J., 1986, Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature, 323(6088), 533-536. https://www.nature.com/articles/323533a0
DOI
|
64 |
Shin, C., and Min, D.-J., 2006, Waveform inversion using a logarithmic wavefield, Geophysics, 71(3), R31-R42. https://sspace.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/6107/1/Logarithm_inversion_2006_CSShin.pdf
DOI
|
65 |
Shin, C., and Cha, Y. H., 2008, Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain, Geophys. J. Int., 173(3), 922-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03768.x
DOI
|
66 |
Shin, C., and Ho Cha, Y., 2009, Waveform inversion in the Laplace-Fourier domain, Geophys. J. Int., 177(3), 1067-1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04102.x
DOI
|
67 |
Shin, C., Pyun, S., and Bednar, J. B., 2007, Comparison of waveform inversion, Part 1: Conventional wavefield vs. logarithmic wavefield, Geophys. Prospect., 55, 449-464. https://scholar.google.co.kr/citations?user=9iBCrmcAAAAJ&hl=ko
DOI
|
68 |
Stefani, J., 1995, Turning ray tomography, Geophysics, 60(6), 1917-1929. https://library.seg.org/toc/gpysa7/60/6
DOI
|
69 |
Sirgue, L., and Pratt, R. G., 2004, Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies, Geophysics, 69(1), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1649391
DOI
|
70 |
Song, C., and Alkhalifah, T. A., 2022, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion via Physics-Informed Neural Networks, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 60, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2021.3123122
DOI
|
71 |
Sun, H., and Demanet, L., 2020, Extrapolated full-waveform inversion with deep learning, Geophysics, 85(3), R275-R288. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0195.1
DOI
|
72 |
Sun, J., Innanen, K. A., and Huang, C., 2021, Physics-guided deep learning for seismic inversion with hybrid training and uncertainty analysis, Geophysics, 86(3), R303-R317. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0312.1
DOI
|
73 |
Sun, J., Niu, Z., Innanen, K. A., Li, J., and Trad, D. O., 2020, A theory-guided deep-learning formulation and optimization of seismic waveform inversion, Geophysics, 85(2), R87-R99. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0138.1
DOI
|
74 |
Taner, M. T., and Koehler, F., 1969, Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation applications of velocity functions, Geophysics, 34(6), 859-881. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440058
DOI
|
75 |
Tarantola, A., 1984, Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation, Geophysics, 49(8), 1259-1266. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441754
DOI
|
76 |
van Leeuwen, T., and Herrmann, F. J., 2013, Mitigating local minima in full-waveform inversion by expanding the search space, Geophys. J. Int., 195(1), 661-667. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt258
DOI
|
77 |
Virieux, J., Brossier, R., Metivier, L., Operto, S., and Ribodetti, A., 2016, Direct and indirect inversions, J. Seismol., 20(4), 1107-1121. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-016-9587-3
DOI
|
78 |
van Leeuwen, T., and Herrmann, F. J., 2015, A penalty method for PDE-constrained optimization in inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 32(1), 015007. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/1/015007
DOI
|
79 |
Vantassel, J. P., Kumar, K., and Cox, B. R., 2022, Using convolutional neural networks to develop starting models for near-surface 2-D full waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 231(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac179
DOI
|
80 |
Vigh, D., and Starr, E. W., 2008, 3D prestack plane-wave, fullwaveform inversion, Geophysics, 73(5), VE135-VE144. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2952623
DOI
|
81 |
Wang, W., and Ma, J., 2019, VMB-Net: A deep learning network for velocity model building in a cross-well acquisition geometry, 89th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 2569-2573. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2019-3216078.1
DOI
|
82 |
Wang, W., McMechan, G. A., Ma, J., and Xie, F., 2021, Automatic velocity picking from semblances with a new deep-learning regression strategy: Comparison with a classification approach, Geophysics, 86(2), U1-U13. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0423.1
DOI
|
83 |
Wang, J., Xiao, Z., Liu, C., Zhao, D., and Yao, Z., 2019, Deep learning for picking seismic arrival times, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 124(7), 6612-6624. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017536
DOI
|
84 |
Warner, M., and Guasch, L., 2014, Adaptive waveform inversion: Theory, 84th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1089-1093. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-0371.1
DOI
|
85 |
Warner, M., and Guasch, L., 2016, Adaptive waveform inversion: Theory, Geophysics, 81(6), R429-R445. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0387.1
DOI
|
86 |
Warner, M., Stekl, I., and Umpleby, A., 2007, Full wavefield seismic tomography - Iterative forward modeling in 3D, 69th International Annual Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, C025. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201401526
DOI
|
87 |
Woodward, M. J., Nichols, D., Zdraveva, O., Whitfield, P., and Johns, T., 2008, A decade of tomography: Geophysics, 73(5), VE5-VE11. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2969907
DOI
|
88 |
Wu, R. S., Luo, J., and Wu, B., 2014, Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model, Geophysics, 79(3), WA13-WA24. doi: 10.1190/GEO2013-0294.1
DOI
|
89 |
Wu, Y., Lin, Y., and Zhou, Z., 2018, Inversionnet: Accurate and efficient seismic waveform inversion with convolutional neural networks, 88th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 2096-2100. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2998603.1
DOI
|
90 |
Wu, Y., and Lin, Y., 2019, InversionNet: An efficient and accurate data-driven full waveform inversion, IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging, 6, 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCI.2019.2956866
DOI
|
91 |
Wu, Y., and McMechan, G. A., 2019, Parametric convolutional neural network-domain full-waveform inversion, Geophysics, 84(6), R881-R896. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0224.1
DOI
|
92 |
Yang, F., and Ma, J., 2019, Deep-learning inversion: A nextgeneration seismic velocity model building method, Geophysics, 84(4), R583-R599. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0249.1
|
93 |
Yang, Y., Engquist, B., Sun, J., and Froese, B. D., 2016, Application of optimal transport and the quadratic Wasserstein metric to full-waveform inversion, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1612.05075. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.05075
DOI
|
94 |
Yang, Y., Engquist, B., Sun, J., and Hamfeldt, B. F., 2018, Application of optimal transport and the quadratic Wasserstein metric to full-waveform inversion, Geophysics, 83(1), R43-R62. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0663.1
DOI
|
95 |
Zhang, Z., and Lin, Y., 2020, Data-driven seismic waveform inversion: A study on the robustness and generalization, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 58(10), 6900-6913. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2977635
DOI
|