1 |
Watson MJ. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiother. 2002;88(7):386-397.
DOI
|
2 |
Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12(1):6-9.
DOI
|
3 |
Wong SST, Yam MS, Ng SSM. The Figure-of-Eight Walk test: reliability and associations with stroke-specific impairments. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1896-1902.
DOI
|
4 |
Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr So. 2006;54(5):743-749.
DOI
|
5 |
Sun W, Watanabe M, Hirota C, Tanimoto Y, Kono R, Takasaki K. Obstacle-negotiating gait and related physical measurement indicators for the community-dwelling elderly in Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(3):e41-e45.
DOI
|
6 |
Storm FA, Buckley CJ, Mazza C. Gait event detection iin laboratory and real life settings: accuracy of ankle and waist sensor based methods. Gait Posture. 2016;50:42-46.
DOI
|
7 |
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther. 1986;66(10):1530-1539.
DOI
|
8 |
de Rooij IJM, van de Port IGL, Visser-Meily JMA, Meijer JWG. Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):89.
DOI
|
9 |
Tamburini P, Storm F, Buckley C, Bisi MC, Stagni R, Mazza C. Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait. Gait Posture. 2018;59:248-252.
DOI
|
10 |
Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Hsu HW, Wu HC, Hsieh CL. Psychometric comparisons of 3 functional ambulation measures for patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(9):2021-2025.
DOI
|
11 |
Kuntapun J, Silsupadol P, Kamnardsiri T, Lugade V. Smartphone monitoring of gait and balance during irregular surface walking and obstacle crossing. Front Sport Act Living. 2020;2:560-577.
|
12 |
Ho S, Mohtadi A, Daud K, Leonards U, Handy TC. Using smartphone accelerometry to assess the relationship between cognitive load and gait dynamics during outdoor walking. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3119.
DOI
|
13 |
Praschiv-lonescu A, Newman CJ, Carcreff L, Gerber CN, Armand S, Aminian K. Locomotion and cadence detection using a single trunk-fixed accelerometer: validity for children with cerebral palsy in daily life-like conditions. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):24.
DOI
|
14 |
An JA, Lee BH. Reliability of joint angle during sit-to-stand movements in persons with stroke using portable gait analysis system based wearable sensors. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2019;8(3):146-151.
DOI
|
15 |
Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM, Richards L, Subashan P, et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007;38(7):2096-2100.
DOI
|
16 |
Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the funtional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(10):1314-1319.
DOI
|
17 |
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64(1):35-40.
DOI
|
18 |
Andersson AG, Kamwendo K, Seiger A, Appelros P. How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit: validity indexes of 4 test methods. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):186-191.
DOI
|
19 |
Severinsen K, Jakobsen JK, Overgaard K, Andersen H. Normalized muscle strength, aerobic capacity, and walking performance in chronic stroke: a population-based study on the potential for endurance and resistance training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(10):1663-1668.
DOI
|
20 |
Hess RJ, Brach JS, Piva SR, VanSwearingen JM. Walking skill can be assessed in older adults: validity of the Figure-of-8 Walk test. Phys Ther. 2010;90(1):89-99.
DOI
|
21 |
Walker ML, Austin AG, Banke GM, Foxx SR, Gaetano L, Gardner LA, et al. Reference group data for the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2007;87(11):1468-1477.
DOI
|
22 |
Beninato M, Fernandes A, Plummer LS. Minimal clinically important difference of the Funtional Gait Assessment in older adults. Phys Ther. 2014;94(11):1594-1603.
DOI
|
23 |
Hirota C, Wantanabe M, Sun W, Tanimoto Y, Kono R, Takasaki K, et al. Association between the trail making test and physical performance in elderly Japanese. Geriati Gerontol Int. 2010;10(1):40-47.
DOI
|
24 |
Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability fro falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903.
DOI
|
25 |
Ahn SN, Hwang S. An investigation of factors influencing the participation of stroke survivors in social and leisure activities. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2018;7(2):67-71.
DOI
|
26 |
Jacobs JM, Cohen A, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Azoulay D, Maaravi Y, Stessman J. Going outdoors daily predicts long-term functional and health benefits among ambulatory older people. J Aging Health. 2008;20(3):259-272.
DOI
|
27 |
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-148.
DOI
|
28 |
Toda H, Maruyama T, Tada M. Indoor vs. outdoor walking: does it make any difference in joint angle depending on road surface? Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:119.
DOI
|
29 |
Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75-82.
DOI
|