1 |
Radiology ACo. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3rd ed. Reston, Va. American College of Radiology 1998
|
2 |
Park VY, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Moon HJ. Second-look US: how to find breast lesions with a suspicious MR imaging appearance. Radiographics 2013;33:1361-1375
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Brennan SB, Corben A, Liberman L, et al. Papilloma diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is surgical excision still warranted? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:W512-519
DOI
|
4 |
Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1658-1663
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:426-430
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci 2006;5:7-15
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Liberman L, Bracero N, Vuolo MA, et al. Percutaneous largecore biopsy of papillary breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:331-337
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Rosen EL, Bentley RC, Baker JA, Soo MS. Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1185-1192
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM, Singer CI, Cangiarella J. Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology 2006;238:801-808
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1095-1110
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Muttarak M, Lerttumnongtum P, Chaiwun B, Peh WC. Spectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:700-707
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Kil WH, Cho EY, Kim JH, Nam SJ, Yang JH. Is surgical excision necessary in benign papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core biopsy? Breast 2008;17:258-262
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:333-341
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Puglisi F, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M, et al. Role of mammography, ultrasound and large core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of papillary breast lesions. Oncology 2003;65:311-315
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Drew PJ, Chatterjee S, Turnbull LW, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:599-603
DOI
|
16 |
Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901-910
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999;213:881-888
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, et al. MR-directed ("Second- Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:370-377
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Risk of carcinoma after subsequent excision of benign papilloma initially diagnosed with an ultrasound (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy: a prospective observational study. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1093-1100
DOI
|
20 |
Tominaga J, Hama H, Kimura N, Takahashi S. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papillomas of the breast. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:153-157
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Bhattarai N, Kanemaki Y, Kurihara Y, Nakajima Y, Fukuda M, Maeda I. Intraductal papilloma: features on MR ductography using a microscopic coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:44-47
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Daniel BL, Gardner RW, Birdwell RL, Nowels KW, Johnson D. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:887-892
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Francis A, England D, Rowlands D, Bradley S. Breast papilloma: mammogram, ultrasound and MRI appearances. Breast 2002;11:394-397
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Kurz KD, Roy S, Saleh A, Diallo-Danebrock R, Skaane P. MRI features of intraductal papilloma of the breast: sheep in wolf's clothing? Acta Radiol 2011;52:264-272
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Rovno HD, Siegelman ES, Reynolds C, Orel SG, Schnall MD. Solitary intraductal papilloma: findings at MR imaging and MR galactography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:151-155
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Zhu Y, Zhang S, Liu P, Lu H, Xu Y, Yang WT. Solitary intraductal papillomas of the breast: MRI features and differentiation from small invasive ductal carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:936-942
DOI
|
27 |
Georgian-Smith D, Lawton TJ. Variations in physician recommendations for surgery after diagnosis of a high-risk lesion on breast core needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:256-263
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Masood S, Rosa M. Borderline breast lesions: diagnostic challenges and clinical implications. Adv Anat Pathol 2011;18:190-198
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Brookes MJ, Bourke AG. Radiological appearances of papillary breast lesions. Clin Radiol 2008;63:1265-1273
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Eiada R, Chong J, Kulkarni S, Goldberg F, Muradali D. Papillary lesions of the breast: MRI, ultrasound, and mammographic appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:264-271
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Ballesio L, Maggi C, Savelli S, et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study. Radiol Med 2008;113:249-264
DOI
ScienceOn
|