1 |
Kuroki-Suzuki S, Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Nawano S, Moriyma N, Okazaki M. Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007;6:21-27
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2646-2655
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007;370:485-492
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901-910
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ, et al. High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W93-W99
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3248-3258
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;116:161-169
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS MRI Enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2007;13:545-550
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Jansen SA. Ductal carcinoma in situ: detection, diagnosis, and characterization with magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2011;32:306-318
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, et al. Categorization of nonmass- like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer 2008;15:241-246
DOI
|
11 |
Meeuwis C, Van de Ven SM, Stapper G, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 2010;20:522-528
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:826-831
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007;245:684-691
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Newell D, Nie K, Chen JH, et al. Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Eur Radiol 2010;20:771-781
DOI
|
15 |
Woodhams R, Ramadan S, Stanwell P, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 2011;31:1059-1084
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:965-974
DOI
|
17 |
Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, et al. Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast. JBR BTR 2005;88:225-232
|
18 |
Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:562-571
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Peters NH, Vincken KL, van den Bosch MA, Luijten PR, Mali WP, Bartels LW. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:1100-1105
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:319-324
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005;4:35-42
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 2011;260:364-372
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR, et al. Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion-weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2011-2019
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:562-570
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Cho N, Moon WK, Chang JM, et al. Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1618-1627
DOI
|
26 |
Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7703-7720
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Society AC. Breast cancer survival rates by stage. 2012
|
28 |
Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:791-807
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Youk JH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Park BW, Kim SI. Benign papilloma without atypia diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: clinical and US features predictive of upgrade to malignancy. Radiology 2011;258:81-88
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
O'Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ. Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clin Radiol 2010;65:259-270
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Helbich TH, Matzek W, Fuchsjager MH. Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 2004;14:383-393
DOI
|
32 |
Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K, et al. Ultrasound-guided largecore needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 2004;92:231-235
|
33 |
Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:967-972
DOI
|
34 |
Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:43-49
DOI
|
35 |
Suh Y, Kim M, Kim E, et al. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8-or 11- gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy. Br J Radiol 2012;85:e349-e356
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1017-1021
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Bhooshan N, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Li H, Lan L, Newstead GM. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 2010;254:680-690
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer,2009.
|
39 |
Moon M, Cornfeld D, Weinreb J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009;17:351-362
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:51-56
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 2008;248:406
DOI
ScienceOn
|