Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2022.25.4.21

A Study on the Development and Validation of the Learning Competencies Scale for Engineering College Students: A Case Study K University  

Kim, Na-Young (College of Liberal Arts, Chugye University for the Arts)
Kang, Donghee (Institute for Tomorrow Educational Policy, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.25, no.4, 2022 , pp. 21-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is conducted with the aim of identify the factors constituting learning competencies for engineering college students, and developing and validating the scale to measure them. To this end, literature and prior research were reviewed and focus group interview was conducted with high-achieving learners of K University in the capital region of Korea. According to previous research, 3 learning competency groups, 12 learning competencies and 41 sub-competencies were derived. Delphi survey was carried out twice, 28 sub-competencies were derived among the 41 sub-competencies through this process. 166 initial items were developed through literature review and FGI. Then, 130 items were confirmed by verifying content validity in the second Delphi survey. Based on this, pilot test were performed with 110 students in K university, and an interview was conducted with 50 students who participated in the pilot test. Reflecting the pilot test results, 1 sub-competency and 22 items were deleted. After the confirmed pilot test results, the main test were performed with all current students in K University. According to the main test result, the validity of the scale and the model fit was verified for the response data of 823 students, and the scale consisting of a total of 105 items was confirmed. The final learning competencies scale included three competency groups and 10 learning competencies. The scale developed in this study can be used as an independent scale for each competency group as needed. It is expected that this scale can be contributed to support the development their learning competencies for academic success of engineering college students, who are future learners.
Keywords
Learning competencies; Learning competencies scale; Competencies modeling; Engineering education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 하영자(2011). 적시학습 지원을 위한 모바일러닝이 학습만족도 및 학습역량에 미치는 효과. 평생학습사회, 7(1), 17-41.
2 Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M.(1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290.   DOI
3 손원빈.최화숙(2019). 대학생용 학습역량 진단도구(H-LCT) 개발. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(12), 907-930.
4 신용국.김명소.한영석(2009). 셀프리더십 척도(Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire) 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 6(3), 377-393.
5 양홍권(2016). 대학생용 학습역량 검사도구 개발 연구. 평생교육.HRD 연구, 12(1), 31-66.
6 이경화 외(2011). 대학생용 학습역량 검사 (LCT-CMB) 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 25(4), 791-809.
7 이효선(2014). 대학생의 다양성 수용도가 창의성에 미치는 영향: 협동학습역량과 폐기학습역량의 매개효과. 박사학위논문. 중앙대학교.
8 조명희.이현우(2014). 대학입학전형 유형에 따른 전공계열별 신입생의 학습역량 차이 분석. 진로교육연구, 27(3), 163-179.
9 Pintrich, P. R. & de Groot, E. V.(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.   DOI
10 Pintrich, P. R. et al.(1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). The University of Michigan
11 Zimmerman, B. J.(1989). A social-cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 319-339.   DOI
12 윤정일 외(2007). 인간의 능력으로서의 역량에 대한 고찰: 역량의 특성과 차원. 교육학연구, 45(3), 233-260.
13 안규림.이경화(2013). 성인학습자의 학습역량 분석. Global Creative Leader, 3, 53-72.
14 이석재 외(2003). 생애능력 측정도구 개발연구: 의사소통 능력, 문제해결 능력, 자기주도적 학습능력을 중심으로. 한국교육개발원.
15 손은령.김연중(2010). 대학생용 학습행동 검사도구 개발. 상담학연구, 11(2), 973-890.
16 송상호.신종호(2002). 인터넷 환경에서의 사이버 학습 역량탐색. 교육정보미디어연구, 8(1), 49-78.
17 안종배(2017). 대한민국 미래교육의 인재상. 국제미래학회, 한국교육학슬정보원(편). 제4차 산업혁명시대 대한민국 미래교육보고서 (pp. 172-176), 광문각.
18 양병화(2006). 다변량 데이터분석법의 이해. 커뮤니케이션북스.
19 양흥권(2015). 학업성취 우수 대학생의 학습역량 사례연구. 교육문화연구, 21(1), 103-140.   DOI
20 우종필(2012). 구조방정식 모델의 개념과 이해. 한나래아카데미.
21 이혜정.임상훈(2021). 대학생 학습역량 진단도구 개발 및 타당화 연구: A대학을 중심으로. 교육공학연구, 37(3), 681-718.
22 장환영.임윤서.이선영(2016). 동국대 맞춤형 자기주도 학습역량 측정도구 개발연구. 동국대학교 교수학습개발센터.
23 정미경(2005). 대학생용 자기조절학습 검사도구 개발. 교육평가연구, 18(3), 155-181.
24 조은성(2007). 탐색적 요인분석 사용의 적절성 검토. 마케팅연구, 22(3), 179-208.
25 최미순.조혜영.이희연(2019). 대학생 학습역량 척도의 타당화 연구: S대학교 재학생을 중심으로. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(3), 309-335.
26 한국공학교육인증원(2014). 공학교육인증기준2015(KEC2015). ABEEK-2014-ABE-010.
27 김나영 외(2014). Course Embedded Assessment를 위한 Soft Skill 진단도구 개발. 서울과학기술대학교 공학교육혁신센터.
28 성은모.최효선(2016). 대학교육에 성적 우수 학습자의 자기주도학습역량 요인 탐색. 교육공학연구, 32(2), 427-452.
29 김은정(2000). 학습스타일의 유형 및 구성요소와 교육과정과의 관계에 대한 연구. 박사학위논문. 연세대학교.
30 김지숙(2016). 대학생의 학습역량 진단 연구: 중요도와 실행도의 차이 분석을 중심으로. 교육연구논총, 37(2), 97-125.   DOI
31 홍기칠(2004). 구성주의적 자기주도학습을 위한 학습력 분석과 학습모형 개발. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 75-98.
32 Gregorc, A. F.(1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 5, 234-237.
33 Gordon, W. I., Lindner, R. W., & Harris, B. R.(1996). A factor analytic study of the Self-Regulated Learning Inventory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 334)
34 Colby, R. L.(2017). Competency-based education: A new architecture for K-12 schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
35 Richman, J., Makrides, L., & Prince, B.(1980). Research methodology and applied statistics, part 3: measurement procedures in research. Physiotherapy Canada, 32(5), 253- 257.
36 Weinstein, M. E., Palmer, D. R., & Acee, T. W.(2016). User's manual learning and study strategies inventory(3rd ed.). Clearwater, FL:H & H Publishing.
37 양명희(2000). 자기조절학습의 모형 탐색과 타당화 연구. 박사학위논문. 서울대학교.
38 Heppner, P. P. & Petersen, C. H.(1982). The development and implications of a personal problem solving inventory. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 29, 66-75.   DOI
39 Lawshe, C. H.(1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.   DOI
40 Hair, J. F. Jr. et al.(2009). Multivariate data analysis(7th Edition). Person India
41 Talbot, G. L.(1994). The assessment of student study skills and learning strategies to prepare teachers for academic advising tasks or the prevalidation of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ), learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI), and test of reactions and adaptation to college (TRAC). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 035).
42 김정연(2017). 대학생 창의융합역량 측정도구 개발 및 타당화. 박사학위논문. 숭실대학교.
43 Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F.(1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29   DOI
44 Lucia, A. D. & Lepsinger, R.(1999). The art & science of competency models. Jossey-Bass San Francisco