Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2022.2.2.049

Debating Feminist Foreign Policy: The Formation of (Unintended) Publics in Sweden's Public Diplomacy  

Isabelle Karlsson (Lunds Universitet)
Publication Information
Journal of Public Diplomacy / v.2, no.2, 2022 , pp. 49-69 More about this Journal
Abstract
Investigating how publics form, this study aims to develop an understanding of how publics of Sweden's feminist foreign policy are constructed in public diplomacy discourse. To this end, the study conceptualizes publics as forming around perceptions of foreign policy that are mediated through public diplomacy events. Based on a debate on Sweden's feminist foreign policy on the digital platform Reddit, the research suggests three features of publics that become visible in the formation process. These are 1) relationality, 2) performance of meaning, and 3) temporariness in the form of shifting views. The study thus argues that the formation of publics in public diplomacy is highly context-dependent, and that also "unintended" publics are important for the enactment of public diplomacy. The study contributes to a practice focused and more inclusive approach to publics in public diplomacy.
Keywords
public diplomacy; publics; feminist foreign policy; Reddit; discourse; narrative;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Aggestam, K., & Bergman-Rosamond, A. (2016). Swedish Feminist Foreign Policy in the Making: Ethics, Politics, and Gender. Ethics & International Affairs, 30(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679416000241   DOI
2 Aggestam, K., Rosamond, A. B., & Hedling, E. (2021). Feminist digital diplomacy and foreign policy change in Sweden. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00225-3   DOI
3 Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002   DOI
4 Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2011). Qualitative Research and Theory Development: Mystery As Method. Sage.
5 Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand Public. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv053   DOI
6 Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the "counter" in counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x   DOI
7 Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self : Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Polity Press.
8 Bjola, C., Cassidy, J. A., & Manor, I. (2020). Digital Public Diplomacy. Business as Usual or a Paradigm Shift? In N. Snow & N. J. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2 ed., pp. 405-412). Routledge.
9 Bossetta, M., Dutceac Segesten, A., & Trenz, H.-J. (2017). Engaging with European Politics Through Twitter and Facebook: Participation Beyond the National? In M. Barisione & A. Michailidou (Eds.), Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era (pp. 53-76). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
10 Brunsson, N. (1993). Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(6), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90001-M   DOI
11 Cohen, J. E. (2016). Presidential Attention Focusing in the Global Arena: The Impact of International Travel on Foreign Publics. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12250   DOI
12 Cortes, J. J., & Jamieson, T. (2020). Incorporating research design in public diplomacy: The role of listening to foreign publics. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1214-1231.
13 Davies, S. E., & True, J. (2017). Norm Entrepreneurship in Foreign Policy: William Hague and the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Conflict. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 701-721. https://doi.org//10.1093/fpa/orw065   DOI
14 di Martino, L. (2020). The Spectrum of Listening. In N. Snow & N. J. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2 ed., pp. 21-29). Routledge.
15 Duncombe, C. (2019). Digital Diplomacy: Emotion and Identity in the Public Realm. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X 14101016   DOI
16 Erlandsen, M. (2021). Book Review of Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2nd Edition), edited by Nancy Snow and Nicholas J. Cull, Routledge, 2020. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(1), 114-116. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.1.114   DOI
17 Di Martino, L., Tam, L., & Varpahovskis, E. (2022, April). As Trust in Social Media Crumbles, Are These Platforms Still Adequate for Public Diplomacy? https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/trust-social-media-crumbles-are-these-platforms still-adequate-public-diplomacy
18 Dolea, A. (2018). Public diplomacy as co-constructed discourses of engagement. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Engagement (pp. 331- 345). Wiley Blackwell.
19 Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2012). Defining Strategic Publics in a Networked World: Public Diplomacy's Challenge at Home and Abroad. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341236   DOI
20 Given, L. M. (2008). In Vivo Coding. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods.
21 Goldsmith, B. E., Horiuchi, Y., & Matush, K. (2021). Does Public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits. American Political Science Review, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000393   DOI
22 Grunig, J. E., & Kim, J.-N. (2017). Publics approaches to health and risk message design and processing. In R.L. Parrott. (Ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.322   DOI
23 Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social Media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65, 932-952. https://doi.org//10.1111/jcom.12185   DOI
24 Guimaraes, A., Balalau, O., Terolli, E., & Weikum, G. (2019). Analyzing the Traits and Anomalies of Political Discussions on Reddit. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13(01), 205-213. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3222
25 Jasser, J., Garibay, I., Scheinert, S., & Mantzaris, A. V. (2021). Controversial information spreads faster and further in Reddit [Pre-print]. Journal of Computational Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00121-z   DOI
26 Ingenhoff, D., Calamai, G., & Sevin, E. (2021). Key Influencers in Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Country-Based Social Network Analysis. Social Media + Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120981053   DOI
27 Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-Construction: An Introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1   DOI
28 Jones, R. (2002). Challenges to the notion of publics in public relations: implications of the risk society for the discipline. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00110-8   DOI
29 Kaiser, J. (2017). Public spheres of skepticism: Climate skeptics' online comments in the German networked public sphere. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1661-1682.
30 Kampf, R., Manor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341318   DOI
31 Karlsson, I. (2021). "We try to be nuanced everywhere all the time": Sweden's feminist foreign policy and discursive closure in public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00245-z   DOI
32 Kaneva, N. (2014). Critical Reflections on Nation Branding as Discourse and Practice. In A. N. Samaras (Ed.), Images of Nations: Strategic Communication, Soft Power and the Media (pp. 61-75). Kastaniotis.
33 Kaneva, N., & Cassinger, C. (2022). Centering gender in public diplomacy and nation branding: an invitation to reimagine the future of the field. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00265-3   DOI
34 Manor, I., Jimenez-Martinez, C., & Dolea, A. (2021, January 27). Blog Post | An asset or a hassle? The public as a problem for public diplomats. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/hjd/news/2021/blog-post---an-asset-or-a-hassle-the-public-as-a-problem-for-public-diplomats https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/hjd/news/2021/blog-post---an-asset-or-a-hassle-the-public-as-a-problem-for-public-diplomats
35 Lee, K. S., & Ingenhoff, D. (2020). Cultural mediation in international exchange programs: personalization, translation, and coproduction in exchange participant blogs. International Journal of Communication, 14(21), 4343-4363
36 Loehwing, M., & Motter, J. (2009). Publics, Counterpublics, and the Promise of Democracy. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 42(3), 220-241. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25655356
37 Manor, I., & Pamment, J. (2019). Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(2), 93-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1577801   DOI
38 Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations (pp. 3-27). Palgrave MacMillan.
39 Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic Narratives. Communication Power and the New World Order. Routledge.
40 Melissen, J. (2013). Public Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (pp. 436-452). Oxford University Press.
41 Pacher, A. (2018). Strategic Publics in Public Diplomacy: A Typology and a Heuristic Device for Multiple Publics. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13, 272-296. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-13020004   DOI
42 Pamment, J., & Cassinger, C. (2018). Nation branding and the social imaginary of participation: An exploratory study of the Swedish Number campaign. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417751152   DOI
43 Pamment, J. (2012). What became of the new public diplomacy? Recent developments in British, US and Swedish public diplomacy policy and evaluation methods. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(3), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119112X635177   DOI
44 Pamment, J. (2013). New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. Routledge.
45 Pamment, J. (2021). Does Public Diplomacy Need a Theory of Disruption? The Role of Nonstate Actors in Counter-branding the Swedish COVID-19 Response. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(1), 80-110. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.1.080   DOI
46 Perez, L. A., Chon, M.-G., Vibber, K., & Kim, J.-N. (2021). Classifying foreign publics: Examining the relationships behavioral experience, symbolic environment, and communication behaviors among key foreign publics. Politics & Policy, 49(6), 1308-1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12439   DOI
47 Tago, A. (2017). Public Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
48 Proferes, N., Jones, N., Gilbert, S., Fiesler, C., & Zimmer, M. (2021). Studying Reddit: A Systematic Overview of Disciplines, Approaches, Methods, and Ethics. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019004   DOI
49 Rosen Sundstrom, M., & Elgstrom, O. (2019). Praise or critique? Sweden's feminist foreign policy in the eyes of its fellow EU members. European Politics and Society, 21(4), 418-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1661940   DOI
50 Rosen Sundstrom, M., Zhukova, E., & Elgstrom, O. (2021). Spreading a norm-based policy? Sweden's Feminist Foreign Policy in international media. Contemporary Politics, 27(4), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1902629   DOI
51 Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.
52 Tam, L., & Kim, J.-N. (2019). Who are publics in public diplomacy? Proposing a taxonomy of foreign publics as an intersection between symbolic environment and behavioral experiences. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-018-0104-z   DOI
53 Wang, J. (2006). Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.12.001   DOI
54 Wang, J., & Chang, T.-K. (2004). Strategic public diplomacy and local press: how a high profile "head-of-state" visit was covered in America's heartland. Public Relations Review, 30(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2003.11.002   DOI
55 Youmans, W. L., & Powers, S. (2012). Remote Negotiations: International Broadcasting as Bargaining in the Information Age. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2149-2172.
56 Zaharna, R. S. (2021). A Humanity-Centered Vision of Soft Power for Public Diplomacy's Global Mandate. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(2), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.2.027   DOI
57 Zaharna, R.S. (2004). Asymmetry of cultural styles and the unintended consequences of crisis public diplomacy. In H. Slavik (Ed.), Intercultural communication and diplomacy (pp. 133-142). Diplo Foundation.
58 Zaharna, R. S. (2016). Reassessing "whose story wins:" The trajectory of identity resilience in narrative contests. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4407-4438.
59 Zaharna, R. S. (2018). Global engagement culture and communication insights from public diplomacy. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Engagement (pp. 313-330). Wiley Blackwell.
60 Zaharna, R. S., Fisher, A., & Arsenault, A. (2013). Introduction: The Connective Mindshift. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift (pp. 1-14).
61 Asplid, A., & Jakobson, H. (2017). Efter slojkritiken: Traffas inte i Iran. Expressen. https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/efter-slojkritiken-traffas-inte-i-iran/
62 Dictionary.com. (n.d.). Walk of shame. Retrieved from: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/walk-of-shame
63 Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Misogyny. Retrieved from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny
64 Dictionary, U. (n.d.). Walk of Shame. Retrieved from: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Walk%20of%20Shame
65 Skoglund, K. (2020). Ann Linde om relationen med Kina: "Problematiskt". Expressen. https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/ann-linde-om-relationen-med-kina-problematiskt/
66 Ministry for Foreign Affairs. (2019). The Swedish Foreign Service action plan for feminist foreign policy 2019-2022, including direction and measures for 2020.
67 Sveriges Radio. (2017). Sweden accused of double standards after minister wears headscarf in Iran. Sveriges Radio (Sweden's Radio). https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/6629515
68 SVT. (2017, 13 February 2017). Linde svarade pa slojbraket: "Jag vill inte bryta mot lagen". SVT (Sweden's television). https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/linde-svarade-pa slojbraket
69 Taylor, A. (2017). Sweden's 'feminist' government criticized for wearing headscarves in Iran. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/02/13/swedens-feminist government-criticized-for-wearing-headscarves-in-iran/
70 UN Watch. (2017). Walk of Shame: Sweden's "first feminist government in the world" don Hijabs for Iran's President Rouhani. UN Watch. https://unwatch.org/issue-622-swedens-hijabs-iran/
71 Clement, J. (2022). Regional distribution of desktop traffic to Reddit.com as of May 2022 by country.https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-socialnet-works ranked-by-number-of-users/
72 Dixon, S. (2022). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of monthly active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-socialnetworks ranked-by-number-of-users/