Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2014.21.4.001

Changes in Sensory Function After Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Primary Motor Cortex Area  

Min, Dong-Ki (Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Keimyung University)
Publication Information
Physical Therapy Korea / v.21, no.4, 2014 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that delivers low-intensity direct current to cortical areas, thereby facilitating or inhibiting spontaneous neuronal activity. This study was designed to investigate changes in various sensory functions after tDCS. We conducted a single-center, single-blinded, randomized trial to determine the effect of a single session of tDCS with the current perception threshold (CPT) in 50 healthy volunteers. Nerve conduction studies were performed in relation to the median sensory and motor nerves on the dominant hand to discriminate peripheral nerve lesions. The subjects received anodal tDCS with 1 mA for 15 minutes under two different conditions, with 25 subjects in each groups: the conditions were as follows tDCS on the primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS on M1. We recorded the parameters of the CPT a with Neurometer$^{(R)}$ at frequencies of 2000, 250, and 5 Hz in the dominant index finger to assess the tactile sense, fast pain and slow pain, respectively. In the test to measure CPT values of the M1 in the tDCS group, the values of the distal part of the distal interphalangeal joint of the second finger statistically increased in all of 2000 Hz (p=.000), 250 Hz (p=.002), and 5 Hz (p=.008). However, the values of the sham tDCS group decreased in all of 2000 Hz (p=.285), 250 Hz (p=.552), and 5 Hz (p=.062), and were not statistically significant. These results show that M1 anodal tDCS can modulate sensory perception and pain thresholds in healthy adult volunteers. The study suggests that tDCS may be a useful strategy for treating central neurogenic pain in rehabilitation medicine.
Keywords
Current perception threshold; Primary motor cortex area; Sensory function; Transcranial direct current stimulation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Floel A, Rosser N, Michka O, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20(8):1415-1422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20098   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Sato S, et al. Attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81(5):366-376.   DOI
3 Drouot X, Nguyen JP, Peschanski M, et al. The antalgic efficacy of chronic motor cortex stimulation is related to sensory changes in the painful zone. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 7):1660-1664.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Zald DH, et al. Activation of prefrontal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation reduces appetite for risk during ambiguous decision making. J Neurosci. 2007;27(23):6212-6218.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, et al. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006a;122(1-2):197-209.   DOI
6 Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166(1):23-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117(4):845-850.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Fregni F, Freedman S, Pascual-Leone A. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(2):188-191.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, et al. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006b;54(12):3988-3998.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;3(7):383-393.
11 Iyer RB, Silaghi-Dumitrescu R, Kurtz DM Jr, et al. High-resolution crystal structures of desulfovibrio vulgaris (hildenborough) nigerythrin: facile, redox-dependent iron movement, domain interface variability, and peroxidase activity in the rubrerythrins. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2005;10(4):407-416.   DOI
12 Katims JJ, Naviasky EH, Rendell MS, et al. Constant current sine wave transcutaneous nerve stimulation for the evaluation of peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(4):210-213.
13 Antal A, Terney D, Poreisz C, et al. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26(9):2687-2691.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Lopes M, et al. Modulatory effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on perception and pain thresholds in healthy volunteers. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15(10): 1124-1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02270.x   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Morita H, Petersen N, Nielsen J. Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during voluntary movement of the lower limb in man. Exp Brain Res. 1998;120(2):143-152.   DOI
16 Kodama M, Aono K, Masakado Y. Changes in sensory functions after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2009;34(4):122-129.
17 Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527 Pt 3:633-639.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 McKay DR, Ridding MC, Miles TS. Magnetic stimulation of motor and somatosensory cortices suppresses perception of ulnar nerve stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;48(1):25-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57(10):1899-1901.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Oliviero A, Esteban MR, de la Cruz FS, et al. Short-lasting impairment of temperature perception by high frequency rTMS of the sensorimotor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(5):1072-1076.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, et al. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007;72(4-6):208-214.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Priori A, Berardelli A, Rona S, et al. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport. 1998;9(10):2257-2260.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Satow T, Mima T, Yamamoto J, et al. Short-lasting impairment of tactile perception by 0.9Hz-rTMS of the sensorimotor cortex. Neurology. 2003;60(6):1045-1047.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Tamura Y, Hoshiyama M, Inui K, et al. Facilitation of A[delta]-fiber-mediated acute pain by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 2004;62(12):2176-2181.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Silva G, Miksad R, Freedman SD, et al. Treatment of cancer pain with noninvasive brain stimulation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(4):342-345.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study. Neuroimage. 2007;35(3):1113-1124.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Summers J, Johnson S, Pridmore S, et al. Changes to cold detection and pain thresholds following low and high frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Neurosci Lett. 2004;368(2):197-200.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Vines BW, Cerruti C, Schlaug G. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2008;9:103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-103   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Lee TS. Change to current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold following 10Hz repetitive TMS of the primary motor cortex. Daejeon, Chungnam National University, Master Thesis. 2007.