Browse > Article

A Study on the Full-scale Soil Washing Process Improved by Multi-stage Continuous Desorption and Agitational Desorption Techniques to Remediate Petroleum-contaminated Soils  

Seo, Yong-Sik (Alpha Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd.)
Choi, Sang-Il (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
Jang, Min (Korea Mine Reclamation Corporation (MIRECO) Technology Research Center)
Publication Information
Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment / v.13, no.5, 2008 , pp. 81-87 More about this Journal
Abstract
In accompany with the transfer of US army bases, recent surveys reported serious contamination of soils by the release of petroleum from storage facilities and heavy metals accumulated in rifle-ranges. These problems have made an increased concerns of cleanup technology for contaminated soils. In this study, a full-scale soil washing process improved by multistage continuous desorption and agitational desorption techniques was examined for petroleum-contaminated soils obtained from three different remedial sites that contained 29.3, 16.6, and 7.8% of silt and clay, respectively. The initial concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) were 5,183, 2,560, and 4,860 mg/kg for each soil. Pure water was applied to operate washing process, in which water used for washing process was recycled 100% for over 6 months. The results of full-scale washing tests showed that the TPH concentrations for soils (> 3.0 mm) were 50${\sim}$356 mg/kg (85.2${\sim}$98.2% removal rates), regardless of the contents of silt and clay from in A, B and C soil, when the soils were washed at 3.0 kg/$cm^2$ of injection pressure with the method of wet particle separation. Based on the initial TPH concentration, the TPH removal rates for each site were 85.2, 98.2 and 89.9%. For soils in the range of 3.0${\sim}$0.075 mm, the application of first-stage desorption technique as a physical method resulted 834, 1,110, and 1,460 mg/kg of TPH concentrations for each soil, also additional multi-stage continuous desorption reduced the TPH concentration to 330, 385, and 245 mg/kg that were equivalent to 92.4, 90.6, and 90.1% removal rates, respectively. The result of multi-stage continuous desorption for fine soil (0.075${\sim}$0.053 mm) were 791, 885, and 1,560 mg/kg, and additional agitation desorption showed 428, 440, and, 358 mg/kg of TPH concentrations. Compared with initial concentration, the removal rates were 92.0, 93.9 and 92.9%, respectively. These results implied we could apply strategic process of soil washing for varies types of contaminated soils to meet the regulatory limit of TPH.
Keywords
Petroleum-contaminated soil; Soil washing with water; Physical desorption; Multi-stage continuous desorption; Agitational desorption;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한국유기농협회, 2004, 친환경농업-유기농업(1)
2 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Engineering Bullentin: Soil Washing Treatment, Office of Soil Waste and Emergency Response, EPA, 1990
3 Ramana, K.V. and Karanth. N.G., 1989, Factors affecting biosurfactant production using Pseudomonas aeruginosa CFTR-6 under submergedconditions, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol, 43, 249-257
4 환경부, 2007, 오염토양 정화방법 가이드라인
5 환경부, 2006, 토양환경보전법
6 Grasso, D., 1993, Hazardous Waste Site Remediation Source Control, Lewis Publishers, USA, G-Chemical Extraction and Soil Washing, p. 18-38
7 Semer, R. and Reddy, K.R., 1996, Evaluation of soil washing process to removed mixed contaminants from a sandy loam, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 45(1), 45-57   DOI   ScienceOn
8 강성모, 김대원, 김혜자, 1944, Biosurfactant를 생산하는 P.aeruginosa. KK-7 의 분리 및 Biosurfactant 의 생산, Kor. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 22(1), 92-99
9 Jang, M., Hwang, J.-S., Choi, S.-I., and Park, J.-K., 2005, Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils and washing effluent, Chemosphere, 60(3), 344-354   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Wallace, S. and Cork, J., 1998, Remediation Basford Gasworks Using Soil Washing, Sixth International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil, Contaminated Soil, London, p. 63-74
11 William, C. and Anderson, P.E., 1993. Innovative site remediation technology soil washing/soil flushing, American Academy of Environmental Engineers, 3, 4.3
12 환경부, 2005, 특정토양오염관리대상시설 설치신고 및 검사결과 현황
13 Bhandari, A., Novak, J.T., and Dove, D.C., 2000, Effect of soil washing on petroleum hydrocarbon distribution on sand surfaces, J. Haz. Sub. Res., 2(7), 1-13
14 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Survey Staff. 1951. Soil Survey Manual. USDA handbook no. 18. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
15 공준, 최상일, 1998, 유류 오염토양 복원을 위한 토양세척 장비의 적용성 연구, 한국토양환경학회지, 3(3), 109-116
16 환경부, 2006, 토양오염공정시험법