Browse > Article

Theoretical Study on the Opportunity of Scientific Argumentation for Implementing Authentic Scientific Inquiry  

Park, Young-Shin (Korean Educational Development Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean earth science society / v.27, no.4, 2006 , pp. 401-415 More about this Journal
Abstract
The science education reforms put the emphasis of scientific literacy, so that students can understand how scientific knowledge is constructed through scientific inquiry at schools. However, scientific inquiry at schools has a problem as a cookbook system without the opportunity of developing argumentation, where students could understand how they use evidence to support their theory or vice versa. Teachers are supposed to understand the basic elements, purpose, and definition of scientific inquiry to implement authentic scientific inquiry at schools, then develop the instructional strategies of providing the opportunity of scientific argumentation to meet its needs.
Keywords
scientific inquiry; scientific argumentation; authentic scientific inquiry; school scientific inquiry;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 교육부, 1997, 과학과 교육과정. (주)대한교과서, 서울, 90 p
2 Dunbar, K. and Klahr, D., 1989, Developmental differences in scientific discovery processes. In Klahr, D. and Kotovsky, L. (eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert, A. Simon Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA, 109-143
3 Kuhn, D., 1989, Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689   DOI   ScienceOn
4 National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., USA, 410p
5 Park, Y.-S., 2005, Analyzing explicit teaching strategies and student discourse for scientific argumentation. Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 286 p
6 Chinn, C.A., and Malhotra, B.A., 2002, Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Reiff, R., Harwood, W.S., and Phillipson, T., 2002, Scientists' conceptions of scientific inquiry: Voices from the front. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA
8 Flick, L.B., 1997, Focusing research on teaching practices in support of inquiry. Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL
9 Gallagher, J.J. and Tobin, K., 1987, Teacher management and student engagement in high school science. Science Education, 71(4), 535-555   DOI
10 김희경, 송진웅, 2004, 학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1216-1234
11 Crawford, T., Kelly, G.J., and Brown, C., 2000, Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237-258   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., and Scott, P., 1994, Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12
13 Lederman, N.G., 1992, Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359   DOI
14 National Research Council, 1996, National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 262 p
15 Keys, C.W. and Kennedy, W., 1999, Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: A case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(4), 315-333   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Reif, F., and Larkin, J.H., 1991, Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 733-760   DOI
17 Driver, R., Newton, P., and Osborne, J., 2000, Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Crawford, B.A., 1998, The poisons project: Motivate your students with inquiry-based unit. Science Scope, 21(5), 18-21
19 Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. and Bugallo-Rodriguez, A., 1997, Argument in high school genetics. Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL
20 Krajcik, K., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., Fredricks, J., and Soloway, E., 1998, Inquiry in projectbased science classrooms: Initial Attempts by middle students. The Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3-4), 313-350   DOI
21 Ritchie, S.M., and Rigano, D.L., 1996, Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 799-815   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Newton, P., Driver, R., and Osborne, J., 1999, The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576   DOI
23 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 418 p
24 Khishfe, R., and Abd-El-Khalick, F., 2000, The Influence of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA
25 Bybee, R.W., 2000, Teaching science as inquiry. In Minstrell, J. and Van Zee, E.H. (eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, D.C., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 21-46