Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.6.508

Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of the Potential Energy Curve  

Park, Jong-Yoon (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Eun-Kyoung (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Abstract
In this study, the pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding of potential energy curve was investigated. The subjects were 24 junior students and 26 senior students studying chemistry education in a college of education. A concept questionnaire consisted of thought experiments with different initial conditions was developed to survey the pre-service teachers’ conceptions of potential energy curve. The survey results showed that the pre-service chemistry teachers had difficulties to accept the negative values for potential energy and total energy. And they knew the mechanical energy conservation but they could not apply it properly to the thought experiment situations given in the questionnaire. Also they had the knowledge about the direction of force exerted between the two balls, but many of them believed that the balls would stop moving at the bottom of potential energy curve well. In addition, it was discovered that few pre-service teachers could relate the thought experiments to the chemical bonding, the liquefaction of gas, and the molecular vibration.
Keywords
Potential energy; Potential energy curve; Conservation of mechanical energy; Pre-service chemistry teacher; Conceptual understanding;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Park, J.-Y. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 2014, 18, 1239.   DOI
2 Park, J.-Y. J. Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu. 2011, 31, 1009.
3 Kang, D.-H.; Paik, S.-H.; Park, K.-T. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004, 48, 399.   DOI
4 Alyea, H. N. J. Chem. Educ. 1942, 19, 337.   DOI
5 Hewson, P. W.; Beeth, M. E.; Thorley, N. R. In International Handbook of Science Education, Part One; Fraser, B. J.; Tobin, K. G., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2003; pp. 199-218.
6 Wandersee, J. H.; Mintzes, J. J.; Novak, J. D. In Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning; Gable, D. L., Ed.; Macmillan Publishing Co.: New York, 1994; pp. 177-210.
7 Tsai, C.-C.; Wen, M. L. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2005, 27, 3.   DOI
8 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. National Curriculum of Science Education 2011-361; MEST: Seoul, 2011.
9 Lin, T.-C.; Lin, T.-J.; Tsai, C.-C. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2014, 36, 1346.   DOI
10 Lee, M.-H.; Wu, Y.-T.; Tsai, C.-C. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2009, 31, 1999.   DOI
11 Stephanik, B. M.; Shaffer, P. S. AIP Conf. Proc. 2012, 1413, 367.
12 Lindsey, B. A. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2014, 10, 013101.   DOI
13 Pujol, O.; Pérez, J. P. Eur. J. Phys. 2007, 28, 569.   DOI
14 Saglam-Arslan, A. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2010, 19, 303.   DOI
15 Neumann, K.; Viering, T.; Boone, W. J.; Fischer, H. E. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2013, 50, 162.   DOI
16 McClelland, G. Phys. Educ. 1989, 24, 162.   DOI
17 NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2013.
18 Treagust, D. F.; Duit, R. Cult. Stud. of Sci. Educ. 2008, 3, 297.   DOI
19 Talanquer, V. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2007, 29, 853.   DOI
20 Levy Nahum, T.; Mamlok-Naaman, R.; Hofstein, A.; Krajcik, J. Sci. Educ. 2007, 91, 579.   DOI
21 Leite, L.; Mendoza, J.; Borsese, A. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2007, 44, 349.   DOI
22 King, C. J. H. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2010, 32, 565.   DOI
23 Kahveci, A. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2009, 10, 109.   DOI