Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2005.26.7.1083

Characteristics of Zeta Potential Distribution in Silica Particles  

Kim, Jin-Keun (Korea Water Resources Corporation, Water Resources Academy)
Lawler, Desmond F. (Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin)
Publication Information
Abstract
Most experimental studies available in the literature on filtration are based on observed average zeta potential of particles (usually 10 measurements). However, analyses of data using the average zeta potential alone can lead to misleading and erroneous conclusions about the attachment behavior because of the variation of particle zeta potentials and the heterogeneous distribution of the collector surface charge. To study characteristics of zeta potential, zeta potential distributions (ZPDs) of silica particles under 9 different chemical conditions were investigated. Contrary to many researchers’ assumptions, most of the ZPDs of silica particles were broad. The solids concentration removal was better near the isoelectric point (IEP) as many researchers have noticed, thus proper destabilization of particles is very important to achieve better particle removal in particle separation processes. While, the mean zeta potential of silica particles at a given coagulant dose was a function of particle concentration; the amount of needed coagulant for particle destabilization was proportional to the total surface charge area of particles in the suspension.
Keywords
Zeta potential distribution (ZPD); Electrophoretic mobility; Particle destabilization;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 6  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 4
연도 인용수 순위
1 Delgado, A. V.; Arroyo, F. J. Interfacial Electrokinetics and Electrophoresis; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2002; p 25
2 Stumm, W.; Morgan, J. J. Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd Ed.; Wiley- Interscience: New York, 1996; pp 516-586
3 Edzwald, J. K. Treatment Process for Particle Removal; AWWARF and AWWA: Denver, 1997; pp 73-87
4 Elimelech, M.; Gregory, J.; Jia, X.; Williams, R. Particle Deposition and Aggregation; Butterworth Heinemann: Oxford, U.K., 1995; pp 23-32
5 Hunter, R. J. Foundations of Colloid Science, 2nd Ed.; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, 2001; pp 373-433
6 Shaw, D. J. Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry; Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.: England, 1992; pp 189-209
7 Kim, J. Physicochemical Aspects of Particle Breakthrough in Granular Media Filtration, Ph.D. Dissertation; The University of Texas at Austin: 2004; pp 125-225
8 Parks, G. A. Chemical Reviews 1965, 65, 177-198   DOI
9 Amirtharajah, A.; Mills, K. M. J. AWWA 1982, 74(4), 210-216
10 Findlay, A. D.; Thompson, D. W.; Tipping, E. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 1996, 118(1,2), 97-105   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Rajagopalan, R.; Chu, R. Q. J. of Colloid and Interface Science 1982, 86(2), 299-317   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ohshima, H. J. of Colloid and Interface Science 1994, 168(1), 269-271   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Letterman, R. D. Water Quality and Treatment, 5th Ed.; McGraw- Hill: New York, 1999; pp 6.1-6.43
14 Elimelech, M.; Nagai, M.; Ko, C.; Ryan, J. N. Environmental Science and Technology 2000, 34(11), 2143-2148   DOI   ScienceOn