Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.4.347

Towards the Development of a Reading Material Classification Scheme Based on a Combination of Book Use Facets  

Jiyoung, Shim (연세대학교 대학도서관발전연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.39, no.4, 2022 , pp. 347-373 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, in order to expand the access points of reading materials, a reading material classification (RMC) system based on the facets of book use was devised. The facets of books that can be considered by book users in the reading situation were content-analyzed. Also, through network analysis, subject headings adjacent to one subject heading were grouped into related subject headings. The RMC developed in this study can be used as a tool that provides various access points to help book users search in the library OPAC and other reading information systems.
Keywords
book use facets; information needs; reading material classification; content analysis; network analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 10  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shim, Jiyoung (2021). Identifying information needs of public library users based on circulation data: focusing on public libraries in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(2), 173-199. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.2.173   DOI
2 Shim, Jiyoung (2022). Exploring the contextual elements of book use to improve book recommender systems. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(2), 299-324. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.2.299   DOI
3 Yoo, Yeong-Jun (2004). A study on organizing the web using facet analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 15(1), 23-41.
4 Beghtol, C. (1990). Access to fiction: a problem in classification theory and practice. Part II. Knowledge Organization, 17(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1990-1-21   DOI
5 Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008   DOI
6 Book Industry Study Group (2021). Complete BISAC Subject Headings List, 2021 Edition. Available: https://bisg.org/page/BISACEdition
7 Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1-2), 49-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012530610648671   DOI
8 EDItEUR (2022). Thema Current Version 1.5. Available: https://www.editeur.org/151/Thema/
9 Franzoni, V. & Poggioni, V. (2017). Emotional book classification from book blurbs. Paper presented at the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, Leipzig, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3109422   DOI
10 Goldsmith, T. E. & Davenport, D. M. (1990). Assessing structural similarity of graphs. In. Schvaneveldt, R. W. eds. Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwoord, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing, 75-88.
11 Cho, HyeChon & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2018). A study on improvement for classification of fiction to enhance to accessibility for middle school students. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.1.061   DOI
12 Cho, Hyun-Yang (2020). Design of the curation platform for user-participated book recommendation system of selecting on alternative material for the disabled. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(3), 41-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.3.041   DOI
13 Choi, Ye-Jin & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2013). A study on improving a classification for health categories of internet bookstores in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(3), 49-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.3.049   DOI
14 Choi, YoonKyung & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2015). A study on developing facets for subject headings in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 179-201. https://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.179   DOI
15 Oh, Kyong-Eun & Kim, Gi-Yeong (2008). A study on the convenience in finding books according to classifications: focused on the classifications in public libraries and bookstores. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.025   DOI
16 Korean Publishers Association (2022. 3. 11.). 2021 Publication Statistics (2022.3.11. modified). Available: http://member.kpa21.or.kr/kpa_bbs/2021%eb%85%84-%ec%b6%9c%ed%8c%90%ed%86%b5%ea%b3%84/
17 Kwak, ChulWan (2013). A study of classification system for online bookstore in Korea: categories and book classification. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(1), 221-247. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.1.221   DOI
18 Min, Hye-Young & Lee, Sung-Sook (2012). A study on the classification system for social science field in internet bookstore. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 43(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.1.041   DOI
19 Park, Eunhee & Lee, Mihwa (2020). A study on genre classification for fictions in school libraries. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 31(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2020.31.1.115   DOI
20 Reading Culture Promotion Act, Act No. 18764.
21 Rho, Jee-Hyun (2015). A study on the quality of subject data in library catalogs. Korean Library And Information Science Society, 46(4), 379-402. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.4.201512.379   DOI
22 Guo, J. L., Wang, H. C., & Lai, M. W. (2015). A feature selection approach for automatic e-book classification based on discourse segmentation. Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/prog-12-2012-0071   DOI
23 Library of Congress (2022). LC Subject Headings(LCSH). Available: https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects.html
24 Hollands, N. (2006). Improving the model for interactive readers' advisory service. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 45(3), 205-212.
25 Hunter, E. J. (2017). Classification Made Simple: An Introduction to Knowledge Organisation and Information Retrieval. London: Routledge.
26 Langridge, D. W. (1989). Subject analysis: principles and procedures. London: Bowker-Saur.
27 Martinez-Avila, D. & San Segundo, R. (2013). Reader-interest classification: concept and terminology historical overview. Knowledge Organization, 40(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-2-102   DOI
28 Martinez-Avila, D. (2017). Reader-interest classifications: an alternative arrangement for libraries. Knowledge Organization, 44(3), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2017-3-234   DOI
29 Pejtersen, A. M. (1997). Subject access to Scandinavian fiction literature: Index methods and OPAC development. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
30 Sapiie, J. (1995). Reader-interest classification: the user-friendly schemes. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19(3-4), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v19n03_12   DOI
31 Watt, N. (2016). Readers' Advisory Services and Sources. In Smith, L. C. & Wong, M. A. eds. Reference and Information Services: An Introduction. (5th ed.). Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 666-701.
32 Shim, Jiyoung (2020). Developing facets for fiction retrieval based on user-generated book tags. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(2), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.225   DOI