Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.251

Empirical Verification of Conversion and Restoration of Preservation Format for Dataset: Application of Dataset with Disaster Safety Information to SIARD  

Han, Hui-Jeong (전북대학교 문화융복합아카이빙 연구소)
Yoon, Sung-Ho (전북대학교 일반대학원 기록관리학과)
Oh, Hyo-Jung (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 문화융복합아카이빙 연구소)
Yang, Dongmin (전북대학교 일반대학원 기록관리학과, 문화융복합아카이빙 연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.37, no.2, 2020 , pp. 251-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the use of information has emerged as the core of national competitiveness, major developed countries and the Korean government have realized the importance of data. They have pursued technical research and standard establishment for long-term preservation and continuously strived for systematic management and preservation of data. However, although various types of data are specified for the purpose of record management in the law, there is no specific method on how to collect, manage and preserve them, except standard electronic documents. In particular, management and preservation of huge datasets from the administrative information system have been strongly demanded above all. Any guidelines for datasets do not have been properly provided. After the framework for selecting preservation format must be prepared, the system can be supplemented and built. The framework considering the characteristics of the dataset should be specified more concretely, and empirical verification of the conversion and restoration for the dataset preservation format derived according to the selection criteria is necessary. Therefore, this study intends to propose a method for long-term preservation through empirical verification of the preservation format after deriving an evaluation the framework for the preservation format selection criteria considering the characteristics of the dataset.
Keywords
long-term preservation of electronic records; framework for selection preservation format; administrative information dataset; disaster safety information;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 16  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kang, H. M. (2016). A study on the standardization of jpeg format as a long-term preservation master file for paper archives in the central archives of Korea. Journal of the Korean Library And Information Science Society, 47(4), 489-510. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.489   DOI
2 National Archives of Korea (2004). Electronic record permanent preservation based technology service. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
3 National Archives of Korea (2013). A study on the reproduction technology and the prototype for the electronic records of administrative agency. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
4 국가기록원 (2017). 차세대 기록관리 모델 재설계 연구 개발 완료보고서. 대전: 국가기록원.
5 Roh, J.-W., & So, J.-E. (2020). A study on the management plan for preservation and long-term use of datasets. Journal of D-Culture Archives, 3(1), 51-64.
6 Park, J., & Lee, M. (2019). A study on the introduction of raw image file formats for the management of digital photographic records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(3), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.3.155   DOI
7 Seong, H. H. (2007). A study on document preservation format classified by the type for long-term preservation and use of electronic records. Master's thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Seoul.
8 So, J. E. (2019). A study on derivation critical factor for selection of dataset preservation format: Focus on dataset of relational database. Master's thesis, Jeonbuk National University of Graduate School. Jeonju.
9 Song, C.-H., & Cha, H.-C. (2017). A study on the risk evaluation of electronic records for long-term preservation. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information Winter Conference, 25(1), 29-30.
10 Oh, S.-L., Park, S., & Yim, J. H. (2018). A case study of dataset records in information management system. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(2), 109-133. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.2.109   DOI
11 Oh, S.-L., & Rieh, H.-Y. (2019). Managing data set in administrative information systems as records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(2), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.2.051   DOI
12 Oh, S.-L., Jung, M. R., & Yim, J. H. (2016). Redesigning electronic records preservation formats based on open formats. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(4), 79-120. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.079   DOI
13 Wang, H.-S., & Seol, M.-W. (2017). A study on managing dataset records in government information systems. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(3), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.3.023   DOI
14 Korea Society of Archival Studies (2008). Dictionary of records and archival terminology. Seoul: Yuksa Bipyung Sa.
15 Lim, N., & Nam, Y. (2019). A study on the criteria for digitization of records. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, 30(3), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.3.005   DOI
16 Korea Minisry of Government (2017). Act on activation of data-based administration. Bill number 11077. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Retreived from http://www.lawmaking.go.kr
17 Cha, H.-C., & Song, C.-H. (2019). A risk assessment method for the long-term preservation of electronic records. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, 22(1), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2019.22.1.079   DOI
18 Han, H.-J., Oh, H.-J., & Yang, D. (2020). A study on the selection of preservation format for long-term preservation of electronic records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.069   DOI
19 Ministry of the Interior and Safety, National Information Society Agency (2019). Statistical report on public sector information resources based on the EA in 2019.
20 Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2018). Source data of public sector, preservation is mandatory. Press release. 2018.09.19.
21 Hyun, M. (2005). A study on the management of dataset as records. Journal of the Korean Association of Records Management, 5(2), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2005.5.2.103
22 Giaretta, D., Matthews, B., Bicarregui, J., Lambert, S., Guercio, M., Michetti, G., & Sawyer D. (2009). Significant properties, authenticity, provenance, representation information andOAIS Information. Paper presented at the iPRES 2009: the Sixth International Conferenceon Preservation of Digital Objects, San Francisco, California.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wf3j9cw
23 eCH-0165 (2018). SIARD format specification. Version 2.1
24 eCH-0233 (2019). Archivierung elektronischer steuerdaten und -akten der kantone. Version 1.0
25 Essen M. V., Rooij, M. D., Roberts, B., & Dobbelsteen, M. V. D. (2011). Database preservation case study: Review. National Archives of the Netherlands.
26 Knight, G. (2008). Framework for the definition of significant properties. The National Archives, InSPECT Project Document.
27 Lindely, A. (2013). Database preservation evaluation report -SIARD vs. CHRONOS Preserving complex structures as databases through a record centric approach?. International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (iPres), Lisbon. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3272.8005
28 NARA (2009). Significant properties. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/files/era/acera/pdf/significant-properties.pdf
29 The National Archives (2018. 5. 1). Significant properties. Retrieved from http://www.significantproperties.org.uk