Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.5.542

Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Red-tongued viper snake(Gloydius ussuriensis) of Population  

Kim, Byoung-Soo (Shinseong Girl's Middle School)
Oh, Hong-Shik (Dept. of Science Education, College of Education, Jeju National Univ.)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology / v.28, no.5, 2014 , pp. 542-549 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the body size, sexual size dimorphism (SSD), and related environmental factors between Red-tongued viper snakes (Gloydius ussuriensis) inhabiting two different places, i.e., Jeju Island and its islet Gapado, and to provide data required to maintain species diversity from May, 2006 until June, 2009. The snout-vent length of the Red-tongued viper snake population inhabiting Jeju Island was found to be 242-532 mm ($422.0{\pm}46.7mm$, n = 100) in females and 296-580 mm ($434.5{\pm}51.7mm$, n = 63) in males. In contrast, the snout-vent length was observed to be 205-395 mm ($335{\pm}43.6mm$, n = 55) in female and 215-430 mm ($328{\pm}39.4mm$, n = 73) in male Red-tongued viper snakes inhabiting Gapado. These data demonstrated the snout-vent length of both female and male Red-tongued viper snakes on Jeju Island to be larger than those on Gapado (Female t = 17.343, df = 115, P<0.001; Male = 19.128, df = 101, P<0.001). SSD was measured to be -0.03 in the Red-tongued viper snake population on Jeju Island, with more or less larger sizes in the males, while it was 0.02 in the Red-tongued viper snake population in the Gapado, with a little larger sizes in the females. The reason for this difference in the snake populations between Jeju Island and Gapado may be due to adaption to the different ecological environments. In addition, as SSD, the snout-vent length of the Red-tongued viper snake populations and in young vipers was somewhat higher in the males than in the females on Jeju Island (t = -2.011, df = 117, P<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the snout-vent length of the young and the general Red-tongued viper snake populations on Gapa Island. For the population on Jeju island, the head length (F = 6.318, $df_{1,2}$=1,117, P<0.05), head width (F=8.090, $df_{1,2}$=1,117, P<0.01), inter eye length (F=15.898, $df_{1,2}$=1,117, P<0.001), and tail length (F=238.488, $df_{1,2}$=1,111, P<0.001) were all larger in the males, while females showed higher body mass (F=64.111, $df_{1,2}$=1,114, P<0.001). In the case of the Gapa Island population, no significant differences in the head length, head width, and inter eye length between females and males were observed, while the males had a longer tail length (F=168.555, $df_{1,2}$=1,74, P<0.001) and the females were heavier (F=17.812, $df_{1,2}$=1,76, P<0.001). Though no significant differences were found in the head length, head width, and inter eye length, the tail length (F=67.793, $df_{1,2}$=1,72, P<0.001) and body mass (F=4.558, $df_{1,2}$=1,72, P<0.05) were higher in the young male Red-tongued viper snakes than in the females. The snout-vent length, head length, head width, and inter eye length, which did not display SSD in the young Red-tongued viper snake populations, were higher in the male Red-tongued viper snake populations than in the female population from Jeju Island, implying that SSD in the Red-tongued viper snake population on Jeju Island is expressed due to environmental effects during their growth.
Keywords
SURVIVAL STRATEGY; ECOLOGY; VIPERIDAE; REPTILIA; JEJU ISLAND;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Andersson, M.(1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2 Ashton, K.G.(2001) Body size variation among mainland populations of the western rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis). Evolution 55(12): 2523-2533.   DOI
3 Bertona, M. and M. Chiaraviglio(2003) Reproductive biology, mating aggregations, and sexual dimorphism of the Argentine Boa Constrictor (Boa constrictor occidentalis). Journal of Herpetology 37(3): 510-516.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Seigel, R.A., J.T. Collins and S. S. Novak(2001) Snakes: Ecology and evolutionary biology. The Blackburn Press, caldwell, New Jersey, pp. 1-529.
5 Shine, R.(1978) Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia (Berl.) 33: 269-277.   DOI
6 Shine, R.(1993) Sexual dimorphism. In: Snakes: ecology and behavior (ed. R. Seigel and J. Collins), New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 49-86.
7 Shine, R.(1994) Sexual Size Dimorphism in snakes Revised. Copeia 1994(2): 326-346.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Shine, R., M.M. Olsson, I.T. Moore, M.P. LeMaster and R.T. Mason(1999) Why do male snakes have longer tails than females? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266: 2147-2151.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Taylor, E.N. and D.F. Denardo(2005) Sexual Size Dimorphism and Growth Plasticity in Snakes: and Experiment on the Western Diamond-Backed Rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). Journal of Experimental Zoology 303A: 598-607.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Vincent, S.E., A. Herrel and D.J. Irschick(2004) Sexual dimorphism in head shape and diet in the cottonmouth snake (Agkistrodon piscivorus). Journal of Zoology (London) 264: 53-59.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Whittaker, R.J. and J.M. Fernandez-Palacios(2007) Island biogeography-ecology, evolution, and conservation. Oxford university press, pp. 1-401.
12 Zhao, E. and K. Adler(1993) Herpetology of China. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles in Cooperation with the Chinese Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Oxford.
13 Kamosawa, M. and H. Ota(1996) Reproductive biology of the Brahminy blind snake (Ramphotyphlops braminus) from the Ryukyu archipelago, Japan. Journal of Herpetology 30(1): 9-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Bizerra, A., O.A.V. Marques and I. Sazima(2005) Reproduction and feeding of the colubrid snake Tomodon dorsatus from south-eastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 33-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Boback, S.M.(2003) Body size evolution in snakes: Evidence from island populations. Copeia 2003(1): 81-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Houston, D. and R. Shine(1993) Sexual dimorphism and niche divergence: feeding habits of the Arafura filesnake. Journal of Animal Ecology 62: 737-748.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Kim, B.S. (2011) A study on the ecology of the ussuri mamushi Gloydius ussuriensis from Jeju Island, Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Jeju National University, 86pp. (in Korean with English abstract).
18 Lomolino. M.V.(2005) Body size evolution in insular vertebrates: generality of the island rule. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1683-1699.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Madsen, T. and R. Shine(1993) Phenotypic plasticity in body sizes and sexual size dimorphism in European grass snakes. Evolution 47: 321-325.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Madsen, T. and R. Shine(2000) Silver spoons and snake body sizes: prey availability early in life influences long-term growth rates of free-ranging pythons. Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 952-958.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Pleguezuelos, J.M. and M. Feriche(1999) Reproductive ecology of the Horseshoe whip snake (Coluber hippocrepis). Journal of herpetology 33(2): 202-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Rivas, J.A. and G.M. Burghardt(2001) Understanding sexual size dimorphism in snakes: wearing the snake's shoes. Animal behaviour 62: F1-F6.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Martins, M., M.S. Araujo, R. J. Sawaya and R. Nunes(2001) Diversity and evolution of macrohabitat use, body size and morphology in a monophyletic group of Neotropical pitvipers (Bothrops). Journal of Zoology (London) 254: 529-538.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Brown, G.P. and R. Shine(2002) Reproductive ecology of a tropical natricine snake, Tropidonophis mairii (Colubridae). Journal of Zoology (London) 258: 63-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Boback, S.M. and C. Guyer(2003) Epirical evidence for an optimal body size in snake. Evolution 57(2): 345-351.   DOI