Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2009.35.4.269

Differences of Experts and Non-experts in Perceiving Environmental and Technological Risks  

Hahm, Myung-Il (Department of U-Healthcare management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyaning University)
Kwon, Ho-Jang (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Dankook University)
Lee, Hoo-Yeon (National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center)
Park, Hwa-Gyoo (Department of U-Healthcare management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyaning University)
Lee, Sang-Gyu (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Health Sciences / v.35, no.4, 2009 , pp. 269-277 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : The objective of this study was to examine how experts and the public perceived various environmental and technological hazards based on psychometric paradigm. Methods : We conducted a survey that included 30 hazards and 10 risk attributes. Subjects of this study were 214 people with three groups; (1) experts (55 people), (2) graduates( 78 people), (3) under graduates (81 people). Factor analysis was used to confirm the common risk attribute from 8 risk attributes. Also, multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing on perceived risk and benefit of hazards. Results : This study revealed that experts tend to be more tolerant than graduates and under graduate students for the 30 hazards. Using factor analysis, two main factors were identified: factor 1, commonly called "Dread Risk", and factors 2, commonly called, "Unknown Risk" in the literature. We identified that environmental hormone concentration and global warming ranked high in both dread risk and unknown risk. Multiple regression models were used to test the association of perceived social risk and perceived social benefit with two main factors. Dread risk had significant explanatory power on perceived social risk and benefit. We identified that the experts were less likely to perceived dread risk and know more information about the hazards. Conclusions : There were differences of risk perception between experts and lay people. Especially, experts' perception of risk was commonly lower than other people's perception.
Keywords
perceived risk; psychometric paradigm;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sokolowska, J., Tyszka, T. : Perception and acceptance of technological and environmental risks: why are poor countries less concerned? Risk Analysis, 15(6), 733-743, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S : Cognitive processes and societal risk taking. In Slovic P. The perception of risk. Earthscan, 32-50, 2000
3 Slovic, P. : Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285, 1987   DOI
4 Flynn, J., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., Combs, B. : Gender, race and environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101-1108, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cha, Y.-J. : Risk perception in Korea: An application of psychometric paradigm. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 1(1/2), 42-45, 2000   DOI
6 Zhai, G., Suzuki, T. : Risk perception in Northeast Asia. Environ Monit Asssess Epub DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0524-y, 2008
7 Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C., Fisher, A. : Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 179-193, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., Sandoe, P. : Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41, 111-112, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., Combs, B. : How safe is safe enough? a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefit. Policy Science, 9, 127-152, 1978   DOI
10 Hinman, G. W., Rosa, E. A., Kleinhesselink, R. R., Lowinger, T. C. : Perceptions of nuclear and other risks in Japan and the United States. Risk Analysis, 13, 449-455, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Cha, Y.-J. : Risk perception in Korea: A comparison with Japan and the United States. Journal of Risk Research, 3(4), 321-332, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Siegrist, M., Keller, C., Kiers, H. A. L. : A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis, 25(1), 211-222, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., Slovic, P. : Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis, 24, 1289-1299, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Slovic, P. : The perception of risk. Earthscan, 2000
15 Kleinhesselink, R., Rosa, E. : Cognitive representations of risk perceptions: A comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1), 11-28, 1991   DOI
16 Nyland, L. G. : Risk perception in Brazil and Sweden. Risk Research Report, 15, 1993
17 Bronfma n, N. C., Cifuentes, L . A. : Risk perception in a developing country: The case of Chile. Risk Analysis, 23(6), 1271-1285, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. : Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In Schwing RC and Albers WA Jr. (ed) Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough? New York, Plenum, 1980
19 Teigen, K. H., Brun, W., Slovic, P. : Societal risks as seen by the Norwegian public. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 1, 111-130, 1988   DOI
20 Siegrist, M., Keller, C., Kastenholz, H., Frey, S., Wiek, A. : Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards. Risk Analysis, 27(1), 59-69, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Rundmo, T., Moen, B. E. : Risk perception and demand for risk mitigation in transport: A comparison of lay people, politicians and experts. Journal of Risk Research, 9(6), 623-640, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Barnett, J., Breakwell, G. M. : Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Analysis, 21(1), 171-177, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Park, D. : Possible health risk over table. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences, 35(3), 235-238
24 Lai, J. C., Tao, J. : Perception of environmental hazards in Hong Kong Chinese. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 669-684, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Rohrmann, B. : Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and cross-national comparison. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 150-163, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Renn, O. : Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), 49-71, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Karpowicz-Lazerg, C., Mullet, E. : Societal risk as seen by the French public. Risk Analysis, 13, 253-258, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn