Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2020.35.1.107

Vital Area Identification for the Physical Protection of Nuclear Power Plants during Low Power and Shutdown Operation  

Kwak, Myung Woong (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University)
Jung, Woo Sik (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University)
Lee, Jeong-ho (Korea Institute of Nuclear Nonproliferation and Control)
Baek, Min (Korea Institute of Nuclear Nonproliferation and Control)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Safety / v.35, no.1, 2020 , pp. 107-115 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper introduces the first vital area identification (VAI) process for the physical protection of nuclear power plants (NPPs) during low power and shutdown (LPSD) operation. This LPSD VAI is based on the 3rd generation VAI method which very efficiently utilizes probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) event trees (ETs). This LPSD VAI process was implemented to the virtual NPP during LPSD operation in this study. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) had developed the 2nd generation full power VAI method that utilizes whole internal and external (fire and flooding) PSA results of NPPs during full power operation. In order to minimize the huge burden of the 2nd generation full power VAI method, the 3rd generation full power VAI method was developed, which utilizes ETs and minimal PSA fault trees instead of using the whole PSA fault tree. In the 3rd generation full power VAI method, (1) PSA ETs are analyzed, (2) minimal mitigation systems for avoiding core damage are selected from ETs by calculating system-level target sets and prevention sets, (3) relatively small sabotage fault tree that has the systems in the shortest system-level prevention set is composed, (4) room-level target sets and prevention sets are calculated from this small sabotage fault tree, and (5) the rooms in the shortest prevention set are defined as vital areas that should be protected. Currently, the 3rd generation full power VAI method is being employed for the VAI of Korean NPPs. This study is the first development and application of the 3rd generation VAI method to the LPSD VAI of NPP. For the LPSD VAI, (1) many LPSD ETs are classified into a few representative LPSD ETs based on the functional similarity of accident scenarios, (2) a few representative LPSD ETs are simplified with some VAI rules, and then (3) the 3rd generation VAI is performed as mentioned in the previous paragraph. It is well known that the shortest room-level prevention sets that are calculated by the 2nd and 3rd generation VAI methods are identical.
Keywords
vital area identification; physical protection; low power and shutdown; nuclear power plant;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Y. H. Lee, W. S. Jung and J. H. Lee, "Vital Area Identification Analysis of A Hypothetical Nuclear Facility Using VIPEX", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 87-95, 2011.   DOI
2 W. S. Jung, "ZBDD Algorithm Features for an Efficient Probabilistic Safety Assessment," Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 239, pp. 2085-2092, 2009.   DOI
3 W. S. Jung, M. J. Hwang and M. H. Kang, "Vital Area Identification Rule Development and Its Application for the Physical Protection of Nuclear Power Plants", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 160-171, 2017.   DOI
4 W. S. Jung, "An Efficient Vital Area Identification Method", Korean Nuclear Society, 2017.
5 NRC, Evaluation of Potential Severe Accidents during Low Power and Shutdown Operations at Surry - Unit 1, 1995.
6 IAEA, Nuclear Security Series No. 13 - Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities, INFCIRC 225/Rev. 5, 2011.
7 IAEA, Nuclear Security Series No. 16 - Identification of Vital Areas at Nuclear Facilities, 2012.
8 G.B. Varnado and D.W. Whitehead, Vital Area identification for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Power Reactor Licensees and New Reactor Applicants, SAND-5644. Sandia National Laboratories, 2008.
9 EPRI, Probabilistic Consequences Analysis of Security Threats - A Prototype Vulnerability Assessment Process for Nuclear Power Plants, 1007975, Final Report, 2004.
10 G. B. Varnado and N. R. Ortiz, Fault Tree Analysis for Vital Area Identification, NUREG/CR-0809, SAND79-0946, USA: Sandia Laboratory; 1979.
11 D. W. Stack and K. A. Francis, Vital area Analysis using SETS, NUREG/CR-1487, SAND80-1095, USA: Sandia Laboratory; 1980.
12 Y. H. Lee, W. S. Jung, M. J. Hwang and J. E. Yang, "Vital Area Identification of Nuclear Facilities by using PSA", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 63-68, 2009.
13 C. K. Park, W. S. Jung, J. E. Yang and H. G. Kang, "A PSA-based Vital Area Identification Methodology", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 2(2), 133-140, 2003.
14 J. Ha, W. S. Jung and C. K. Park, "The application of PSA Techniques to the Vital Area Identification of Nuclear Power Plants", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 259-264, 2005.
15 W. S. Jung, Y. H. Lee and J. E. Yang, "Development of a New Quantification Method for a Fire PSA", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 94, Issue 10, pp. 1650-1657, 2009.   DOI