[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2017.6.3.87

GNSS Signal Design Trade-off Between Data Bit Duration and Spreading Code Period for High Sensitivity in Signal Detection

Han, Kahee (World Class Smart Lab of AutoNavLab., Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)
Won, Jong-Hoon (World Class Smart Lab of AutoNavLab., Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)

Publication Information

Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing / v.6, no.3, 2017 , pp. 87-94 More about this Journal

Abstract

GNSS modernization and development is in progress throughout the globe, and it is focused on the addition of a new navigation signal. Accordingly, for the next-generation GNSS signals that have been developed or are under development, various combinations that are different from the existing GNSS signal structures can be introduced. In this regard, to design an advanced signal, it is essential to clearly understand the effects of the signal structure and design variables. In the present study, the effects of the GNSS spreading code period and GNSS data bit duration (i.e., signal design variables) on the signal processing performance were analyzed when the data bit transition was considered, based on selected GNSS signal design scenarios. In addition, a method of utilizing the obtained result for the design of a new GNSS signal was investigated.

Keywords

correlation; modulation; PRN code; navigation bit;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Hein, G. W., Avila-Rodriguez, J.-A., Wallner, S., Pratt, A. R., Owen, J., et al. 2006, MBOC: The New Optimized Spreading Modulation Recommended for Galileo L1 OS and GPS L1C, Inside GNSS, May/June 2006.
2	Foucras, M., Ekambi, B., Bacard, F., Julien, O., & Macabiau, C. 2014, Optimal GNSS Acquisition Parameters when Considering Bit Transitions, Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2014, Position Location and Navigation Symposium, May 2014, Monterey, United States, IEEE, pp.804-817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2014.6851445 DOI
3	Han, K. & Won, J.-H. 2016, GNSS Signal Design Strategy: Focusing on the Relationship Between GNSS Code Correlation and Navigation Date Bit, Proceeding of Korean GNSS Society Conference, 2-4 Nov 2016, Jeju, Korea
4	Johansson, F., Mollaei, R., Thor, J., & Uusitalo, J. 1998, GPS satellite signal acquisition and tracking, Undergraduate projects, Division of Signal Processing, Lulea University of Technology, S-971 87 Lulea, Sweden, August 21 1998.
5	Misra, P. & Enge, P. 2001, Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance (Massachusetts: Ganga-Jamuna Press)
6	Rushanan, J. J. 2007, The Spreading and Overlay Codes for the L1C Signal, NAVIGATION: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 54, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2007.tb00394.x DOI
7	Soualle, F., Soellner, M., Wallner, S., Avila-Rodriguez, J.-A., Hein, G. W., et al. 2005, Spreading Code Selection Criteria for the future GNSS Galileo, Proceeding of the European Navigation Conference GNSS 2005, Munich 19-22 July 2005
8	The National Coordination Office 2016, [Internet], cited 2016 Apr. 26, available from: http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/
9	Van Dierendonck, A. J. 2014, New GNSS Signals: Will Modern Also Be Better?, Inside GNSS, MARCH/APRIL 2014. http://www.insidegnss.com/node/3963
10	Van Diggelen, F. S. T. 2009, A-GPS: Assisted GPS, GNSS, and SBAS (Boston: Artech House Inc.)
11	Won, J.-H., Eissfeller, B., Schmitz-Peiffer, A., Floch, J.-J., Zanier, F., et al. 2012, Trade-off Between Data Rate and Signal Power Split in GNSS Signal Design, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic System, 48, 2260-2281. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2012.6237591 DOI