Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2022.25.3.29

Spatializing beta-diversity of vascular plants - Application of Generalized Dissimilarity Model in the Republic of Korea -  

Choi, Yu-Young (Division of Technical Supervision, Green Technology Center)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.25, no.3, 2022 , pp. 29-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
For biodiversity conservation, the importance of beta-diversity which is changes in the composition of species according to environmental changes has become emphasized. However, given the systematic investigation of species distribution and the accumulation of large amounts of data in the Republic of Korea(ROK), research on the spatialization of beta-diversity using them is insufficient. Accordingly, this research investigated the applicability of the Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling(GDM) to ROK, which can predict and map the similarity of compositional turnover (beta-diversity) based on environmental variables. A brief overview of the statistical description on using GDM was presented, and a model was fitted using the flora distribution data(410,621points) from the National Ecosystem Survey and various environmental spatial data including climate, soil, topography, and land cover. Procedures and appropriated spatial units required to improve the explanatory power of the model were presented. As a result, it was found that geographical distance, temperature annual range, summer temperature, winter precipitation, and soil factors affect the dissimilarity of the vegetation community composition. In addition, as a result of predicting the similarity of vegetation composition across the nation, and classifying them into 20 and 100 zones, the similarity was high mainly in the central inland area, and tends to decrease toward the mountainous areas, southern coastal regions, and island including Jeju island, which means the composition of the vegetation community is unique and beta diversity is high. In addition, it was identified that the number of common species between zones decreased as the geographic distance between zones increased. It classified the spatial distribution of plant community composition in a quantitative and objective way, but additional research and verification are needed for practical application. It is expected that research on community-level biodiversity modeling in the ROK will be conducted more actively based on this study.
Keywords
Vegetation community; Compositional turnover; Dissimilarity; Biodiversity spatialization; Classification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jung S, & Cho YC. 2020. Redefining floristic zones in the Korean Peninsula using high resolution georeferenced specimen data and self organizing maps. Ecology and evolution, 10 (20), 11549-11564.   DOI
2 Kim NS, & Lee HC. 2013. A study on changes and distributions of Korean fir in sub-alpine zone. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 16(5), 49-57.
3 Koo KA, Kim J, Kong WS, Jung H & Kim G. 2016. Projecting the potential distribution of Abies koreana in Korea under the climate change based on RCP scenarios. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 19(6), 19-30.
4 McVittie A, Faccioli M, 2020. Biodiversity and ecosystem services net gain assessment: a comparison of metrics. Ecosystem Services 44, 101145.   DOI
5 Park SU, Koo KA, & Kong WS. (2019). Climate-related range shifts of climate- sensitive biological indicator species in the Korean Peninsula: A Role of dispersal capacity. J Climate Change Res, 10(3), 185- 98.   DOI
6 Shin JH and Kim CM. 1996. Ecosystem classification in Korea (I): Ecoregion classification. Korea Forest Reserach Institute. Forest Science. 54, 188-189.
7 Tuomisto H. 2010a. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33 : 2-22.   DOI
8 Wiersma YF & Urban DL 2005. Beta diversity and nature reserve system design in the Yukon Canada. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1262-1272 23.   DOI
9 Fitzpatrick MC, Sanders NJ, Ferrier S, Longino JT, Weiser MD & Dunn R. 2011. Forecasting the future of biodiversity: a test of single and multi species models for ants in North America. Ecography, 34(5), 836-847.   DOI
10 Di Marco M, Harwood TD, Hoskins AJ, Ware C, Hil, SL, Ferrier S. 2019a. Projecting impacts of global climate and land-use scenarios on plant biodiversity using compositional-turnover modelling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25 (8), 2763-2778   DOI
11 Guisan A, Thuiller W, 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8, 993-1009.   DOI
12 Cho YC, Jung SH, Lee DH, Kim HG, Kim JH. 2020. Forest of Korea (VI) Biogeography of Korea: flora and vegetation. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon.
13 Clough Y, Holzschuh A., Gabriel D, Purtauf T, Kleijn D, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I & Tscharntke T. 2007. Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44(4), 804-812.   DOI
14 Gering JC, Crist TO, & Veech JA. 2003. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conservation biology, 17(2), 488-499.   DOI
15 Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornmell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harriosn SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC & Swenson NG. 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology letters, 14(1), 19-28.   DOI
16 Choi Y, Lim CH, Krasovskiy A, Platov A, Kim Y, Chung HI, … & Jeon SW. 2022. Can a national afforestation plan achieve simultaneous goals of biodiversity and carbon enhancement? Exploring optimal decision making using multi-spatial modeling. Biological Conservation, 267, 109474.   DOI
17 Choi Y, Lim CH, Ryu J, & Jeon SW. 2018. Analysis of future bioclimatic zones using multi-climate models. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 27(5), 489-508.   DOI
18 Ferrier S. 2002. Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here?. Systematic biology, 51(2), 331-363.   DOI
19 Elith J, Leathwick JR, 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 677-697.   DOI
20 Ferrier S, Manion G, Elith J, & Richardson K. 2007. Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Diversity and distributions, 13(3), 252-264.   DOI
21 Ferrier S, Harwood T, Williams KJ & Dunlop M. 2012. Using Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling to assess potential impacts of climate change on biodiversity composition in Australia, and on the representativeness of the National Reserve System. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper No. 13E.
22 Fitzpatrick MC, Mokany K, Manion G, Lisk M, Ferrier S & Nieto-Lugilde D. 2021. gdm: Generalized dissimilarity modeling. R package version 1.4. 2.1.
23 Ferrier S, Powell GV, Richardson KS, Manion G, Overton JM, Allnutt TF… & Van Rompaey RS. 2004. Mapping more of terrestrial biodiversity for global conservation assessment. BioScience, 54(12), 1101-1109.   DOI
24 Yoo S, Lim CH, Kim M, Song C, Kim SJ & Lee WK. 2020. Potential Distribution of Endangered Coniferous Tree Species under Climate Change. Journal of Climate Change Research. 11(4), 215-226.   DOI
25 Park JH, Choe H, & Mo Y. 2020. Complimentary Assessment for Conserving Vegetation on Protected Areas in South Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 34(5), 436-445.   DOI
26 Choi Y, Lim CH, Chung HI, Kim Y, Cho HJ, Hwang, J, … & Jeon SW. 2021. Forest management can mitigate negative impacts of climate and land-use change on plant biodiversity: Insights from the Republic of Korea. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, 112400.
27 Choi Y, Lim CH, Ryu JE, Piao D, Kang JY, Zhu W, … & Jeon SW. 2017. Bioclimatic classification and characterization in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 20(3), 1-18.
28 Edwards DP, Gilroy JJ, Woodcock P, Edwards FA, Larsen TH, Andrews DJ, … & Wilcove DS. 2014. Land sharing versus land sparing logging: reconciling timber extraction with biodiversity conservation. Global change biology, 20(1), 183-191.   DOI
29 McMahon G. Gregonis SM. Waltman SW. Omernik JM, Thorson TD, Freeouf JA & Keys JE. 2001. Developing a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous United States. Environmental Management, 28(3), 293-316.   DOI
30 Lee DK & Kim JU. 2007. Vulnerability assessment of sub-alpine vegetations by climate change in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 10 (6), 110-119.
31 Park HC, Lee JH, & Lee GG. 2014. Predicting the suitable habitat of the Pinus pumila under climate change. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 23(5), 379-392.   DOI
32 Powell KI, Chase JM, & Knight TM. 2013. Invasive plants have scale-dependent effects on diversity by altering species-area relationships. science, 339(6117), 316-318.   DOI
33 Ryu JE, Choi YY, Jeon SW, & Sung HC. 2018. Evaluation of Habitat Function of National Park Based on Biodiversity and Habitat Value. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 21 (5), 39-60.
34 Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE & Edwards DP. 2016. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation?. Trends in ecology & evolution, 31(1), 67-80.   DOI
35 Tuomisto H. 2010b. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography 33 : 23-45.   DOI
36 Karp DS, Rominger AJ, Zook J, Ranganathan J, Ehrlich PR, & Daily GC. 2012. Intensive agriculture erodes β diversity at large scales. Ecology letters, 15(9), 963-970.   DOI
37 Gabriel D, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T, & Thies C. 2006. Beta diversity at different spatial scales: plant communities in organic and conventional agriculture. Ecological applications, 16(5), 2011-2021.   DOI
38 Fitzpatrick MC, Gove AD, Sanders NJ & Dunn RR. 2008. Climate change, plant migration, and range collapse in a global biodiversity hotspot: the Banksia (Proteaceae) of Western Australia. Global Change Biology, 14(6), 1337-1352.   DOI
39 Guisan, A, Thuiller W, Zimmermann NE, 2017. Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: with Applications in R. Cambridge University Press.
40 Kim J, Seo C, Kwon H, Ryu J & Kim M. 2012. A study on the species distribution modeling using national ecosystem survey data. Journal of environmental impact assessment, 21(4), 593-607.   DOI
41 Kim WJ. 2004. Ecoregion classification in Korea based on analysis of geospatial variables. Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Landscape Architecture Major Graduate School Seoul National University.
42 Kong WS. 2005. Selection of vulnerable indicator plants by global warming. Asia-Pacific J. Atm. Sci., 41(2), 263-273.
43 Suh MS, Hong SK & Kang JH. 2009. Characteristics of seasonal mean diurnal temperature range and their causes over South Korea. Atmosphere, 19(2), 155-168.
44 Yun CW, Shin JH, Yang HM, Lim JH, & Lee BC. 2011. Phytosociological classification of forest vegetation in Korea. Korea Forest Research Institute. Seoul, 135pp.
45 Whittaker RH. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21 : 213-251   DOI
46 Williams KJ, Ferrier S, Rosauer D, Yeates D, Manion G, Harwood T, Stein J, Faith DP, Laity T & Whalen A. 2010. Harnessing Continent-Wide Biodiversity Datasets for Prioritising National Conservation Investment. A report prepared for the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Canberra.