Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12673/jant.2018.22.1.1

A Strategy on Standardization of RPAS Airworthiness Certification  

Yoo, Beong-Seon (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center)
Shin, Dong-Jin (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center)
Chang, Jae-ho (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center)
Park, Jung-Min (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center)
Kang, Ja-Young (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center)
Publication Information
Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology / v.22, no.1, 2018 , pp. 1-12 More about this Journal
Abstract
Currently, the domestic UAS technology is lagging behind the leading countries in terms of both advanced technology and industrial competitiveness, but it cannot avoid the global efforts of integrating UAS into existing manned aviation system and applying them to industries. UAS is a relatively new system to existing aviation world, but ICAO is making a great effort to help Contracting States and the aviation industries to better understand and promote UAV systems. In particular, the UAS is classified as RPAS and other UAS, leading to the standardization work for integrating the RPAS into the manned aviation in the near future. For this purpose, ICAO has been promoting the standardization for the global operation of the RPAS, and in this study, it has been carrying out the study on the strategy to establish the domestic RPAS certification system including the ICAO standardization activities. This paper analyzes the domestic and international regulatory frameworks for RPAS and presents a strategy for building the domestic RPAS certification system.
Keywords
Remotely pilot station; Remotely piloted aircraft system; Remotely piloted aircraft; Airworthiness certification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 ICAO, Convention on International Civil Aviation Signed at Chicago, 1944.
2 ICAO, Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS), Doc 10019, 2015.
3 U.S. Department of Defense, Handbook Airworthiness Certification Criteria, MIL-HDBK-516C, 2008.
4 Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, Korean Airworthiness Standards Part 1, 2017.
5 Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, Korean Airworthiness Standards Subpart B Type Certification, 2017.
6 D. K. Hong and K. J. Yee, "Comparison of Airworthiness Certification System between Korea and U.S," The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, NO. 36(3), pp. 298-305, Aug. 2008.   DOI
7 H. K. Yoon, S. J. Kim, Y. T. Kim, and S. H. Lee, Airworthiness Certification Practice Based on Development Experience, G-world, pp 26, 2014.
8 ICAO, Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft, 11th ed, Part 2 Chapter 2, 2010.
9 ICAO, Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft, 11th ed, Part 2 Chapter 3, 2010.
10 S. T. Hong, A Study on Airworthiness Certification System for Aircraft Development, Dept of Air & Space Law Graduate School of Korea Aero space University, Korea Aero space University, Gyeonggi-do, Aug.2012.
11 ICAO, RPAS Concept of Operations for International Operations, ICAO, 17 March 2017.
12 Public Law 112-95. [Internet].Available: https://www.congress.gov/112/plaws/publ95/PLAW-112p ubl95.pdf.
13 FAA, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 107, 2016.
14 FAA, Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Optionally Piloted Aircraft, Order 8130.34D, 2017.
15 J. G. Ponchak, "Considertions for an integrated UAS CNS architecture in Integrated Communications," Navigation and Surveillance Conference, 2017.
16 FAA, Type and Airworthiness Certifications, FAA, UAS Symposium, 2017.
17 ANAC, General Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft of Civil Use, 2017.
18 EASA, Policy Statement: Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft System(UAS), Doc # E.Y013-01, Aug 2009.
19 EASA, Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of drones - Unmanned aircraft system operations in the open and specific category, NPA 2017-05 , May. 2017.