Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2010.29.1.047

Stabilization of As Contaminated Soils using a Combination of Hydrated Lime, Portland Cement, FeCl3·6H2O and NaOH  

Moon, Deok-Hyun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chosun University)
Oh, Da-Yeon (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Lee, Seung-Je (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Park, Jeong-Hun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture / v.29, no.1, 2010 , pp. 47-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a stabilization treatment for As contaminated soil. A combination of hydrated lime, Portland cement, $FeCl_3{\cdot}6H_2O$, and NaOH were used as stabilizing agents. The effectiveness of stabilization treatment was evaluated by the Korean Standard Test (KST) method (1N HCl extraction). Sequential extractions were performed to investigate the As distribution after treatment. Following the application of the treatment, curing periods of up to 7 and 28days were investigated. The experimental results showed that a combination of hydrated lime/Portland cement was more effective than treatments of hydrated lime or Portland cement at immobilizing As in the contaminated soil. The treatment of 25wt% hydrated lime and 5wt% Portland cement was effective in reducing As leachability less than the Korean warning standard of 20 mg/kg. However, the treatments of hydrated lime and Portland cement failed to meet the Korean warning standard even when up to 30 wt% was used. The treatment utilizing hydrated lime and $FeCl_3{\cdot}6H_2O$ was not effective in properly reducing As leachability. The addition of $FeCl_3{\cdot}6H_2O$ was negative in terms of pH condition. Moreover, the treatment with hydrated lime/NaOH was effective in reducing As leachability but not as much as hydrated lime/Portland cement. The sequential extraction results indicated that the residual phase was greatly increased upon the treatment of hydrated lime/Portland cement. It was concluded that the hydrated lime/Portland cement treatment was the best among the other combinations studied at achieving trace As concentrations.
Keywords
Arsenic; $FeCl_3{\cdot}6H_2O$; Hydrated lime; NaOH; Portland cement; Stabilization;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Moon, D.H., Cheong, K.H., Kim, T.S., Khim, J., Choi, S.B., Moon, O.R., Ok, Y.S., 2009. Stabilization of As in soil contaminated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) using calcinated oyster shells, Korean J. Environ. Agr. 28(4), 378-385.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Moon, D.H., Dermatas, D., Menounou, N., 2004. Arsenic immobilization by calcium-arsenic precipitates in lime treated soils, Sci. Total Environ. 330(1-3), 171-185.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Moon, D.H., Wazne, M., Yoon, I.-H., Grubb, D.G., 2008. Assessment of cement kiln dust (CKD) for stabili-zation/solidification (S/S) of arsenic contaminated soils, J. Hazard. Mater. 159, 512-518.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Oremland, R.S., Stolz, J.F., 1995. The ecology of arsenic, Science 300, 939-944.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Richmond, W.R., Loan, M., Morton, J., Parkinson, G.M., 2004. Arsenic removal from aqueous solution via ferrihydrite crystallization control, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(8), 2368-2372.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Singh, T.S., Pant, K.K., 2006. Solidification/stabilization of arsenic containing solid wastes using Portland cement, fly ash and polymeric materials, J. Hazard. Mater. B131, 29-36.
7 USEPA, 2004. Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup, 11th ed., EPA-542-R-03-009, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.
8 Wenzel, W., Kirchbaumer, N., Prohaska, T., Stingeder, G., Lombi, E., Adriano, D.C., 2001. Arsenic fraction-ation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure, Anal. Chim. Acta. 436, 309-323.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Yoshida, T., Yamauchi, H., Fan, S.G., 2004. Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic- via the drinking water: dose-response relationships in review, Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 198, 243-252.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Dubey, B., Townsend, T., 2004. Arsenic and lead leaching from the waste derived fertilizer ironite, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(20), 5400-5404.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Dutre, V., Vandecasteele, C., 1995. Solidification/stabili-zation of arsenic-containing waste: leach tests and behavior of arsenic in the leachate, Waste Manage. 15, 55-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Dutre, V., Vandecasteele, C., Opdenakker, S., 1999. Oxidation of arsenic bearing fly ash as pretreat-ment before solidification, J. Hazard. Mater. B68, 205-215.
13 Jun, K.-S., Oh, S.-E., 2002. Chemical fixation of heavy metal in contaminated soil from abandoned mine land, J. Korean Soc. Civil Engineers. 22, 67-80.
14 Kim, E.I., Kang, W.-H., Park, J.-Y., 2005. Characteri-stics of arsenic contaminated soil in an abandonned mine area and solidification/stabilization of the soil, J. Korean Solid Wastes Eng. Soc. 22(4), 363-371.
15 Lee, B.J., Kwon, Y.B., 2001. Solidification characteri-stics of hazardous waste treated with cement, J. Korean Solid Wastes Eng. Soc. 18(6), 22-30.
16 Lee, K.C., 2006. Immobilization characteristics of arsenic contaminated soil using soluble phosphate and arsenic coagulant, Master thesis.
17 Lee, T.C., Tanaka, N., Lamb, P.W., Gilmer, T.M., Barrett, J.C., 1988. Induction of gene amplification by arsenic, Science 241, 79-81.   DOI
18 Legiec, I.A., Criffin, L.P., Walling, P.D., Breske Jr., T.C., Angelo, M.S., Isaacson, R.S., Lanza, M.B., 1997. DuPont soil washing technology program and treatment of arsenic-contaminated soils, Environ. Prog. 16(1), 29-34.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Dermatas, D., Moon, D.H., Menounou, N., Meng, X., Hires, R., 2004. An evaluation of arsenic release from monolithic solids using a modified semi-dynamic leaching test, J. Hazard. Mater. B116, 25-38.
20 MOE, 2002. The Korean Standard Test (KST) Methods for soils, Korean Ministry of Environment, Gwachun, Kyunggi, pp. 225 (in Korean).
21 Dixit, S., Hering, J.G., 2003. Comparison of Arsenic(V) and Arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: Implications for arsenic mobility, Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(18), 4182-4189.   DOI   ScienceOn