Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.5.673

Reliability and Accuracy of Digital Impression Obtained from CS-3500 Intraoral Scanner  

Kim, Sa-Hak (Department of Dental Technology, School of Medical and Public Health, Kyungdong University)
Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Technology, School of Medical and Public Health, Kyungdong University)
Kim, Chong-Kyen (Department of Hotel Management, School of Tourism, Kyungdong University)
Publication Information
Journal of dental hygiene science / v.15, no.5, 2015 , pp. 673-678 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of linear measurements in digital models compared to master model. A master model (ANKA-4; Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany) with the prepared upper full arch tooth was used. Four linear measurements were recorded between landmarks, directly on the master model and the digital models by a single examiner. Measurements were made with a digital caliper from manual model and with the software from the virtual models. The t-test for paired samples and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The measurement of two methods showed good reliability. The mean differences between master and digital model were 0.06~0.12 mm. These in vitro studies show that accuracy and reliability of the digital impression is similar to that of the gold standard. Therefore digital impression was also considered to be a acceptable for placement clinically.
Keywords
Accuracy; Digital impression; In-office computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing; Reliability;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mah J, Hatcher D: Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 6: 10-16, 2003.   DOI
2 White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS: Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137: e451-459, 2010.
3 Chandran DT, Jagger DC, Jagger RG, Barbour ME: Twoand three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination. Biomed Mater Eng 20: 243-249, 2010.
4 Christensen GJ: The state of fixed prosthodontics impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 343- 346, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Christensen GJ: Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140: 1301-1304, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bindl A, Mormann WH: Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 111: 163-169, 2003.   DOI
7 Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K: Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM allceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16: 244-248, 2003.
8 Caputi S, Varvara G: Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 99: 274-281, 2008   DOI
9 Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B: Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17: 1-6, 2012.
10 Ender A, Mehl A: Full arch scans conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14: 11-21, 2011.
11 Kim KB, Lee GT, Kim HY, Kim JH: The influence of different gypsum materials on the accuracy from complete arch digital impression. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 617-623, 2012.
12 Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud 47: 931-936, 2010.   DOI
13 Lin LI-K: A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45: 255-268, 1989.   DOI
14 Lim MY, Lim SH: Comparison of model analysis measurements among plaster model, laser scan digital model, and cone beam CT image. Korean J Orthod 39: 6-17, 2009.   DOI
15 Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P: Assessment of the accuracy of a three dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 30: 219-223, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Watanebe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro J, Hiroshi Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravere MO: Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile 3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 23: 288-295, 2009.   DOI
17 Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov Al: A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 35: 191-201, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata R: Threedimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110: 365-369, 1996.   DOI
19 Lowey MN: The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast measuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system. Part II: study cast mensuration. Br J Orthod 20: 315-331, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR: The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computerbased digital models. Angle Orthod 74: 298-303, 2004.