Browse > Article

Strategic Approach for South-North Korea's S&T Cooperation  

Son, Ju Yeon (과총부설 정책연구소)
Kim, Si-jeoung (서울디지털재단 정책연구팀)
Lee, Jang-Jae (한국과학기술기획평가원)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.20, no.1, 2017 , pp. 153-174 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study tried to suggest South-North Korea's S&T cooperative strategies and priority areas using mixed-methodology. First, survey research was conducted to analyze the understanding of scientists how they think about these issues. We surveyed scientists whose names are on the KOFST mailing list and analyzed 485 questionnaire responses. After that, experts who are participating in FGI discussed more deeply about the survey results and suggested the feasible strategies and projects. The results suggest some findings about priority cooperation area, new projects and strategies. Priority areas of S&T cooperation are following; agriculture, electricity & energy, and health care. However, more important thing than these priority areas is how to approach the inter-Korean S&T cooperation. More strategic approach is needed while promoting exchange and cooperation projects with north-korea. Also more long-term approach is needed to maintain the sustainability of this S&T cooperation.
Keywords
South-north Korea's S&T cooperation; Survey; FGI; Mixed-methods;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2003), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2 Tashakkori, A. and Creswell, J. W. (2007), "The New Era of Mixed Methods", Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1): 3-7.   DOI
3 Thurmond, V. A. (2001), "The Point of Triangulation", Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3): 253-358.   DOI
4 Kelle, U. (2006), "Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research Practice: Purposes and Advantages", Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(4): 293-311.   DOI
5 과학기술부 (2003), 특정연구개발사업 20년사.
6 권오성.서용석.허준영 (2012), 역대정부의 국정기조 비교분석 연구, 한국행정연구원.
7 김갑식 (2012), "시나리오 기법에 기초한 북한의 변화와 한국의 전략", 현대북한연구, 15(1): 124-156.
8 김도태 (2009), "남북관계의 현주소: 이명박 정부의 대북정책 현황과 과제", 통일문제연구, 21(1): 189-225.
9 박상민.이혜원 (2013), "북한의 보건의료 현황과 효율적 지원방안", Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 56(5): 368-374.   DOI
10 김병로.최경희 (2012), "남북한 주민의 통일의식 비교 분석", 통일과 평화, 4(1): 101-139.
11 배성인 (2010), "북한의 에너지난 극복을 위한 남북 협력 가능성 모색: 신재생에너지를 중심으로", 북한연구학회보, 14(1): 59-90.
12 손주연.김시정 (2013), 차기정부의 남북과학기술협력 전략연구, 한국과총정책연구소.
13 이일학 (2010), "북한 의료현황과 지원방향", KPI 리포트.
14 이장재 외 (2015), 남북교류협력사업: 남북 간 R&D 협력수요 및 추진희망과제 도출, 미래창조과학부.
15 이정철 (2012), "탈냉전기 노태우 정부의 대북정책", 정신문화연구, 35(2): 131-161.
16 이춘근.김종선.남달리 (2014), 남북 ICT 협력 추진 방안, 과학기술정책연구원.
17 장경호 (2011), "남북 농업의 상호보완성 증대를 위한 농업협력의 발전단계와 협력과제", 통일과 평화, 3(1): 345-384.
18 탄홍메이 (2010), "한국 정부의 대북정책에 대 검토적 연구: 김대중, 노무현, 이명박 정부의 비교", 글로벌정치연구, 3(1): 93-115.
19 통일연구원 (2014), '그린 데탕트' 실천전략: 환경공동체 형성과 접경지역.DMZ 평화생태적 이용방안.
20 Creswell, J. W. (2009), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publication.
21 Denzin, N. K. (2012), Triangulation 2.0., Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2): 80-88.   DOI
22 Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P. and Rupert, D. J. (2007), "Merging Qualitative and Quantitative Data in Mixed Methods Research: How To and Why Not", Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 18.
23 Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W. and Stick, S. L. (2006) "Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice", Field Methods, 18(1): 3-20.   DOI
24 Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. and Graham, W. F. (1989), "Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3): 255-274.   DOI
25 Greene, J. C. (2008), "Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology?", Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1): 7-22.   DOI
26 Hussein, A. (2015), "The Use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research: Can Qualitative and Quantitative Methods be Combined?", Journal of Comparative Social Work, 4(1).
27 Jick, T. D. (1979), "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action", Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602-611.   DOI
28 Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004), "Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come", Educational Researcher, 33(7): 14-26.   DOI
29 Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Turner, L. A. (2007), "Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research", Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2): 112-133.   DOI
30 Kruger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. (2014), Focus Groups : A P ractical Guide for Applied Research, Sage Publications.
31 Olsen, W. (2004), "Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed", Developments in Sociology, Causeway Press, 20: 103-118.
32 Fatemeh, R. (2004), "Focus-Group Interview and Data Analysis", Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4): 655-660.   DOI