Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.175

Ultrasonography for long-term evaluation of hyaluronic acid filler in the face: A technical report of 180 days of follow-up  

Rocha, Luiz Paulo Carvalho (Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)
Rocha, Tania de Carvalho (Hermes Pardini Group)
Rocha, Stephanie de Cassia Carvalho (Hermes Pardini Group)
Henrique, Patricia Valeria (Nucleodonto)
Manzi, Flavio Ricardo (Department of Dentistry, Oral Radiology, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)
Silva, Micena Roberta Miranda Alves e (Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.50, no.2, 2020 , pp. 175-180 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we used ultrasonography to monitor the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a filler in the face for esthetic reasons. We monitored changes in the filler shape, distribution, and relationship with adjacent anatomical structures over a 180-day period. Materials and Methods: Two patients each received an ultrasound-guided injection of HA, with different products and application sites for each patient. In 1 patient, the injection was administered in the angle of the mandible, while in the other, it was administered in the zygomatic region. The injection sites were monitored via ultrasonography at 24 hours, 30 days, and 180 days, at which times the imaging characteristics of the filler were observed. All injections were performed by the same professional, as were the ultrasound exams, which were conducted using the same equipment. Results: In both cases, the HA fillers were visualized using ultrasound at all time points. Some differences were observed between the cases in the images and the distribution of the pockets of filler. In 1 case, the filler appeared as a dark hypoechoic region with well-defined contours, and the material was observed to have moved posteriorly by the 180-day mark. In the other case, the material appeared hyperechoic relative to the previous case and presented no noticeable changes in its anteroposterior distribution over time. Conclusion: Based on these 2 cases, ultrasonography can be a complementary tool used to monitor facial fillers over the long term, allowing for the dynamic observation of different fillers.
Keywords
Ultrasonography; Esthetics; Hyaluronic Acid; Dermal Fillers;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sahlani L, Thompson L, Vira A, Panchal AR. Bedside ultrasound procedures: musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2016; 42: 127-38.   DOI
2 Young SR, Bolton PA, Downie J. Use of high-frequency ultrasound in the assessment of injectable dermal fillers. Skin Res Technol 2008; 14: 320-3.   DOI
3 Abdelsalam TA, Amer ME, Mahrous A, Abdelkader M. Evaluation of oral and maxilofacial swellings using ultrasonographic features. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 49: 201-8.   DOI
4 Scholten HJ, Pourtaherian A, Mihajlovic N, Korsten HH, A Bouwman R. Improving needle tip identification during ultrasound- guided procedures in anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 889-904.   DOI
5 Signorini M, Liew S, Sundaram H, De Boulle KL, Goodman GJ, Monheit G, et al. Global aesthetics consensus: avoidance and management of complications from hyaluronic acid fillers- evidence- and opinion-based review and consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 961e-71.   DOI
6 Attenello N, Maas C. Injectable fillers: review of material and properties. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31: 29-34.   DOI
7 Schelke LW, Decates TS, Velthuis PJ. Ultrasound to improve the safety of hyaluronic acid filler treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol 2018; 17: 1019-24.   DOI
8 Pavicic T, Frank K, Erlbacher K, Neuner R, Targosinski S, Schenck T, et al. Precision in dermal filling: a comparison between needle and cannula when using soft tissue fillers. J Drugs Dermatol 2017; 16: 866-72.
9 Pierre S, Liew S, Bernardin A. Basics of dermal filler rheology. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41 Suppl 1: S120-6.   DOI
10 Michaud T. Rheology of hyaluronic acid and dynamic facial rejuvenation: topographical specificities. J Cosmet Dermatol 2018; 17: 736-43.   DOI
11 Josse G, Haftek M, Gensanne D, Turlier V, Mas A, Lagarde JM, et al. Follow up study of dermal hyaluronic acid injection by high frequency ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. J Dermatol Sci 2010; 57: 214-6.   DOI
12 Goh AS, Kohn JC, Rootman DB, Lin JL, Goldberg RA. Hyaluronic acid gel distribution pattern in periocular area with high-resolution ultrasound imaging. Aesthetic Surg J 2014; 34: 510-5.   DOI
13 Schelke LW, Van Den Elzen HJ, Erkamp PP, Neumann HA. Use of ultrasound to provide overall information on facial fillers and surrounding tissue. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 Suppl 3: 1843-51.   DOI
14 Vent J, Lefarth F, Massing T, Angerstein W. Do you know where your fillers go? An ultrastructural investigation of the lips. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2014; 7: 191-9.
15 Wortsman X. Identification and complications of cosmetic fillers: sonography first. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 1163-72.   DOI
16 Greene JJ, Sidle DM. The hyaluronic acid fillers: current understanding of the tissue device interface. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23: 423-32.   DOI