Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2011.41.2.53

Diagnostic performance of dental students in identifying mandibular condyle fractures by panoramic radiography and the usefulness of reference images  

Cho, Bong-Hae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.41, no.2, 2011 , pp. 53-57 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dental students in detection of mandibular condyle fractures and the effectiveness of reference panoramic images. Materials and Methods : Forty-six undergraduates evaluated 25 panoramic radiographs for condylar fractures and the data were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. After a month, they were divided into two homogeneous groups based on the first results and re-evaluated the images with (group A) or without (group B) reference images. Eight reference images included indications showing either typical condylar fractures or anatomic structures which could be confused with fractures. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis of the difference between the first and the second evaluations for each group, and student�fs t-test was used between the two groups in the second evaluation. The intra- and inter-observer agreements were evaluated with Kappa statistics. Results : Intra- and inter-observer agreements were substantial (k=0.66) and moderate (k=0.53), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (Az) in the first evaluation was 0.802. In the second evaluation, it was increased to 0.823 for group A and 0.814 for group B. The difference between the first and second evaluations for group A was statistically significant (p<0.05), however there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the second evaluation. Conclusion : Providing reference images to less experienced clinicians would be a good way to improve the diagnostic ability in detecting condylar fracture.
Keywords
Radiography; Panoramic; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wilson IF, Lokeh A, Benjamin CI, Hilger PA, Hamlar DD, Ondrey FG, et al. Contribution of conventional axial computed tomography (nonhelical), in conjunction with panoramic tomography (zonography), in evaluating mandibular fractures. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45 : 415-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Assael LA. Clinical aspects of imaging in maxillofacial trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 1993; 31 : 209-20.
3 Lee CY, McCullon C 3rd, Blaustein DI, Mohammadi H. Sequelae of unrecognized, untreated mandibular condylar fractures in the pediatric patient. Ann Dent 1993; 52 : 5-8.
4 Rowe NL. Fractures of the facial skeleton in children. J Oral Surg 1968; 26 : 505-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Hovinga J, Boering G, Stegenga B. Long-term results of nonsurgical management of condylar fractures in children. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28 : 429-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Zachariades N, Mezitis M, Mourouzis C, Papadakis D, Spanou A. Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 : 421-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Wilson IF, Lokeh A, Benjamin CI, Hilger PA, Hamlar DD, Ondrey FG, et al. Prospective comparison of panoramic tomography (zonography) and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis and operative management of mandibular fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 : 1369-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Iguchi K, Tanaka M, Okuda D. The assessment of fracture of the mandibular condyle by use of computerized tomography. Incidence of sagittal split fracture. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32 : 77-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20 : 37-46.   DOI
10 Moilanen A. Primary radiographic diagnosis of fractures in the mandible. Int J Oral Surg 1982; 11 : 299-303.   DOI
11 Nair MK, Nair UP. Imaging of mandibular trauma: ROC analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8 : 689-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Raustia AM, Pyhtinen J, Virtanen KK. Examination of the temporomandibular joint by direct sagittal computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1985; 36 : 291-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Christiansen EL, Thompson JR, Hasso AN. CT evaluation of trauma to the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45 : 920-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Chayra GA, Meador LR, Laskin DM. Comparison of panoramic and standard radiographs for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44 : 677-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Reiner SA, Schwartz DL, Clark KF, Markowitz NR. Accurate radiographic evaluation of mandibular fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 : 1083-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Thai KN, Hummel RP 3rd, Kitzmiller WJ, Luchette FA. The role of computed tomographic scanning in the management of facial trauma. J Trauma 1997; 43 : 214-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lee JH, Jung YH, Cho BH, Hwang DS. Diagnostic ability of panoramic radiographs for mandibular fractures. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2010; 40 : 33-8.
18 Buchbinder D. Treatment of fractures of the edentulous mandible, 1943 to 1993: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51 : 1174-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 MacLennan WD. Fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Br J Oral Surg 1969; 7 : 31-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Roth FS, Kokoska MS, Awwad EE, Martin DS, Olson GT, Hollier LH, et al. The identification of mandible fractures by helical computed tomography and panorex tomography. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16 : 394-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Chacon GE, Dawson KH, Myall RW, Beirne OR. A comparative study of 2 imaging techniques for the diagnosis of condylar fractures in children. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61 : 668-73.   DOI   ScienceOn