Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.2.159

The Roles of Benefit and Risk Perception in Ethical Fashion Consumption  

Moon, Heekang (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Pai Chai University)
Choo, Ho Jung (Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
Park, Hye Sun (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Pai Chai University)
Baek, Eunsoo (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.37, no.2, 2013 , pp. 159-173 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research investigates the mechanism of ethical fashion consumption by examining the effects of benefit and risk perception on ethical fashion consumption attitudes and behavioral intention. To test the hypotheses, 300 female consumers between the ages of 20 and 49 were invited as study participants. The reliability and the validity of multi-item constructs were tested by Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The hypotheses were tested by utilizing Structural Equation Analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The benefit perception of ethical consumption was composed of three benefit types, which were altruistic benefit, social image benefit, and self-oriented benefit. Benefit perception, except social image benefit, had significant effects on consumer attitudes towards ethical fashion consumption; similarly, benefit perception had significant effects on behavioral intention (except self-oriented benefit) which had an effect on behavioral intention only when it was mediated by attitudes. Further analysis was conducted to understand the reason for the weak relationship between attitudes and behavioral intention. Financial and performance risk perceptions were tested for the moderating roles of attitudes and behavioral intention; subsequently, only financial risk interacted with attitudes and showed that the positive effects of attitudes on behavioral intention were weakened by a high financial risk perception. Performance risk had a main effect on behavioral intention independent of attitudes. Managerial implication and future study directions are also discussed.
Keywords
Ethical fashion consumption; Benefit perception; Risk perception; Attitudes; Behavioral intention;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hair, Jr. J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2 Hong, H. S., & Koh, A. R. (2009). The effects of benefits pursued to clothing on the purchase intention of apparel for consumer's well-being-Eco-friendly and health-functional apparels-. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(11), 1839-1852.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Hunt, N., & Dorfman, B. (2009, January 28). How green is my wallet? Organic food growth slows. Reuters. Retrieved February 20, 2009, from http://www.reuters.com
4 Hustvedt, G., & Dickson, M. A. (2009). Consumer likelihood of purchasing organic cotton apparel: Influence of attitudes and self-identity. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 13(1), 49-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Irwin, J. R., & Baron, J. (2001). Response mode effects and moral values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 177-197.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, US, 382-393.
7 Joergens, C. (2006). Ethical fashion: myth or future trend? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10(3), 360-371.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jung, H. J. (2009). Buying behavior of eco-friendly fashion products according to eco-friendly attitude. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
9 Jung, Y. J., Park, O. L., & Ha, J. K. (2006). The effect of the clothing benefits sought on the enviromental awareness and environment-friendly consuming behavior. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 8(6), 639−646.   과학기술학회마을
10 Kim, B. M., & Lee, J. M. (1997). The research on the disposal of unused cloths-Focusing on the environmental protection-. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 35(2), 19−32.   과학기술학회마을
11 Kim, H. J. (2003). A critical review on pro-environmental behavior issues. Journal of Geography Education, 47, 79-98.
12 Koh, A. R. (2009). Ethical consumer behavior in Korea: Current status and future prospects. Fashion Information and Technology, 6, 54−62.
13 Kollmus, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239−260.
14 Laroche, M., Mcdougall, G. H. G., Bergeron, J., & Yang Z. (2004). Exploring how intangibility affects perceived risk. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 373−389.
15 Lee, J. E., Kim, I., & Park, S. K. (2002). A study on the consumer behavior on environmentally beneficial clothing. Journal of Fashion Business, 6(2), 77−92.
16 Lee, J. S., Yang, L. N., & Choi, N. Y. (2007). An analysis of environmentally conscious consumers' features and their awareness of green fashion products-Focusing on female residents of Seoul (Comparison between 1999 and 2007)-. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 9 (4), 401-408.
17 Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6), 573-586.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Lee, S. H. (2003). A study on environment-friendly family resource management behaviors, environmental consciousness, knowledge, and education. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 21(1), 91−102.   과학기술학회마을
19 Lee, S. H., & Park, J. E. (2008). Relationship between ethics level, its antecedents and perceived performance in fashion industries. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 13(4) 109-126.
20 Lee, S. H., & Noh, Y. N. (2007). Empirical study on variables affecting consumer ethics related to fashion. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(1), 141-150.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Leonard-Barton, D. (1981) Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243-252.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: Is parsimony always desirable? Journal or Experimental Education, 64(4), 364-390.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Moisander, J., & Pesonen, S. (2002). Narratives of sustainable ways of living: Constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision, 40(4), 329-342.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Ottman, J. A. (1992). Industry's response to green consumerism. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 3-7.
25 Park, H. H., & Oh, S. D. (2005). The influence of materialism and environment consciousness on recycling attitude and behavior of clothing. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 43(10), 167-177.
26 Pellegrini, G., & Farinello, F. (2009). Organic consumers and new lifestyles: An Italian country survey on consumption patterns. British Food Journal, 111(9), 948-974.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281-293.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consump- tion: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883-902.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Shaw, D., Grehan, E., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., & Thomson, J. (2005). An exploration of the values in ethical consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(3), 185-200.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Szmigin, I., & Carrigan, M. (2006). Exploring the dimensions of ethical consumption. European Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 608-613.
31 Throne-Holst, H., & Stø, E. (2008). Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 99-112.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Torjusen, H., Lieblein, G., Wandel, M., & Francis, C. A. (2001). Foodsystem orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 12(3), 207-216.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Tracy, A. P., & Oskamp, S. (1984). Relationship among ecologically responsible behaviors. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13(2), 115-126.
34 Webster, Jr. F. E. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 188-196.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Yi, Y. J. (1994). Testing main effects in interactive multiple regression. Korean Management Review, 23(4), 183-210.
36 Basil, D. Z., & Weber, D. (2006). Values motivation and concern for appearances: The effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11 (1), 61-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage.
38 Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.   DOI
39 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.   DOI
40 Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275-289.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47(2), 250-263.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Berglund, C. (2006). The assessment of households' recycling costs: The role of personal motives. Ecological Economics, 56(4), 560-569.   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-577.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Caruana, R. (2007). A sociological perspective of consumption morality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 287-304.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Cherrier, H. (2007). Ethical consumption practices: Co-production of self-expression and social recognition. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 321-335.   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Connell, K. Y. H. (2010). Internal and external barriers to ecoconscious apparel acquisition. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(3), 279-286.   DOI   ScienceOn
47 Crane, A. (2001). Unpacking the ethical product. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 361-373.   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Creyer, E., & Ross, W. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432.   DOI   ScienceOn
49 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
50 Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376-391.