1 |
Ruth, C. (2000). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to determined factors affecting behavioral intention to adopt electronic shopping on the world wide web: A structural equation modeling approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
|
2 |
Szajna, B. (1994). Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 319-324.
|
3 |
Revenues from Digital Home Health Services to Top $2.1 Billion in 2010. (2006, March 2). Parks Associates. Retrieved October 18, 2009, from http://www.parksassociates.com
|
4 |
Chae, J. M. (2009). Extending the technology acceptance model for smart clothing. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 47(5), 99-110.
과학기술학회마을
|
5 |
Chen, L. D. (2000). Consumer acceptance of virtual stores: A theoretical model and critical success factors for virtual stores. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, Memphis.
|
6 |
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
DOI
|
8 |
Vijayasarathy, L,. R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 41(6), 747-762.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357-389.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
DOI
|
11 |
Venkatesh, V.,& Morris, M. G (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
McFarland, D. J. (1999). The particularization of computer efficacy and its influence on the technology acceptance model: Afield study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
|
13 |
Venture Development Corporation. (2005). Wearable systems: Global market demand analysis (2nd ed.). Natick, MA: VDC Research Group, Inc.
|
14 |
Tan, M., & Teo, T. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information System, 1(5), 1-42.
|
15 |
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integration control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Running Computer Adds New Dimension to Training And Competing. (2006, September 4). Polar Electro. Retrieved October 18,2009, from http://www.polar.fi/en
|
18 |
Kang, K. Y., & Jin, H. J. (2007). A study on consumers' clothing buying intention adopted by the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(8), 1211-1221.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Kim, S. H. (1999). A study on the structure of clothing consumption value and the relation between clothing consumption, clothing involvement, and fashion leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
|
20 |
Lee, H. M. (2008). The study on the acceptance of wearable computers and consumer segmentation: Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
|
21 |
Midgley, D. E, & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 229-242.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Mittal, B. (1989). A theoretical analysis of two recent measures of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 697-702.
|
23 |
Park, S. H.,& Lee J. H. (2001). An exploratory research for design of digital fashion product based on the concept of "Wearable Computer" (1). Journal of Fashion Business, 5(3), 111-128.
|
24 |
Foxall, G. R. (1988). Consumer innovativeness: Novelty seeking, creativity, and Cognitive style. Research in Consumer Behavior, 3, 79-113.
|
25 |
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Engel, J. E, Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behaviour (8th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.
|
27 |
Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16(3), 233-240.
DOI
|
28 |
Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 849-867.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.
DOI
|
30 |
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-305.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Kaiser, S. B. (1990). The social psychology of clothing (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
|
32 |
Cho, H. K., Lee, J. H., Lee, C. K., & Lee, M. H. (2006). An exploratory research for development of design of sensor-based smart clothing: Focused on the healthcare .clothing based on bio-monitoring technology. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 9(2), 141-150.
과학기술학회마을
|
33 |
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concept, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
|
34 |
Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 466-476.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Chen, L. D., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-719.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quartly, 24(4), 665-694.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Davis, E D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, & usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2),227-247.
DOI
ScienceOn
|