Browse > Article

A Comparative Analysis of CAD Education and Key Success Factors in Korea, Japan, Germany and USA (Part I)  

이윤정 (세종대학교 패션디자인학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.28, no.11, 2004 , pp. 1448-1457 More about this Journal
Abstract
Based upon mail survey method, this empirical research aims to compare the CAD education in four countries in terms of education conditions, education methods, and education performance. Results show that Korea is similar to Japan in many ways, while it differ from U.S.A. or Germany in several respects. Putting less importance in CAD course, Korean professors of CAD were found to be relatively young and deficient of teaching experience and/or industrial experience. And CAD course, which is not compulsory but elective one, is taught in a more crowded (junior) class with less satisfactory hardware and software. In the education goal or contents, the CAD courses in Korea lack real world problems or applications, concentrating less on students-based or problem-based learning methods than Germany or U.S.A.. Consequently, Korean CAD education is outperformed by German or U.S. one in educational performance both in skill improvement and in attitude enhancement.
Keywords
CAD; CAD; International comparison; Education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이승엽. (2001). 패션산업과 IT산업의 현황과 전망. 한국의류산업학회지, 3(4), 307-312
2 Anwar, S. & Rothwell, W. J. (1997). Implementing team-based collaborative problem solving in ET: A case study.Journal of engineering technology, 14(1), 34-38
3 Bailey, T. (1990). Changes in the nature and structure ofwork: Implication for skill requirements and skill formation. Berkley, CA: National Center for Research in Voca-tional Education(ERIC Document Reproduction ServicesNo. ED 323, 295
4 Davis, L. D. & Davis, D. F. (1990). The effect of trainingtechniques and personal characteristics on training end-users of information systems. Jourmal of ManagementInformation Systems, 7, 93-110
5 Harris, A. W. & Painer, K. Jr. (1992). The Influence of indi-vidual differences on skills in end-user computing. Jour-nat of Management Information Systems, 9, 93-111
6 Laer, D. (1993). Konstruktionsbeispiel Bluse mit den CAD-Systemen der Finnen Assyst, GGT und Investronica,Hannover, unverffentlichtes Manuskript
7 Stevens, R. J. & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elemen-tary school: Effects on students' achivement, attitudes, andsocial relations. American educational research journal,32(2), 321-351
8 이연순. (1994). 직물디자인 분야의 CAD 시스템 사용현황에 대한 분석적 연구. 자원문제연구논문집, 131, 151-158
9 Dooling, J. O'Donnell. (1999). A Study of gender differencein beliefs toward computer technology and factors whichinfluence these beliefs in grades 4, 5, 6 & 7. doctoraldissertation, University of Hartford. from wwwlib. umi com
10 도규희, 최경순, 조차, 이정옥. (1994). 복식산업발전을 위한 패션 전문 교육에 관한 연구. 복식, 23, 225-248
11 Belleau, B. D. & Dagro, P. (1991). Attitudes of Lousianamanufactuerer towards Computer technology. Journal ofConsumer Studies and Home Economics, 15, 261-273
12 Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperativeleaming. Educational leadership, 48, 73
13 이윤정. (2002). 한국과 미국의 패션마케팅 교육에 관한 비교연구 (제1보). 한국의류학회지, 26(5), 727-736
14 이경희. (1998). 21세기 가정과교육의 발전방향. 교육연구 8, 57-69
15 Sparks, D. & Meador, T. (1996). Partnership with Indusrty inCAD Curriculum Design. ITAA Monograph #8, 93-97
16 Camevale, A. P. & Gainer, L. J. & Meltzer, A. S. (1991). Workplace basics: The essential skills employers want,San Francisco: Jossey-bass Publishers, In: Meyer, D.J.C.(1995): Marketability of the textile and apparel master'sGraduate to business and industry employers, doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University
17 Mirani, R. & King, W.R. (1994). Impacts of end-user andinformation center characteristics on end-user computingsupport. Journal of Management Information Systems,11(I), 141-166
18 김소현. (1996). 이태리패션교육에 관한 고찰. 복식, 27, 157-158
19 Wenzel, D. (1997). WinS CAD- Ein didaktisch-methodischesKonzept fuer Vermittlung von CAD-Technologien. Texti-larbeit+Unterricht 4, 241-246
20 이인숙. (1996). 교육공학의 역할 재규명을 위한 연구. 교육학연구, 34, 5, 487-504
21 Langosche, I. (1999). Unterrcht; Planen-Kontrollieren, ShakerVerlag, 1
22 Routte, H. K. (1996). Textilbarone. Laumann Verlag. 483
23 Zhu, Zhiting. (1996). Cross-cultural portabitity of educationalsoftware: A communication-oriented approach. doctoraldissertation. Universiteit Twente (Nethland), from www.lib.umi.com
24 Lovett, M. G. (1997). The Development of a curriculum for themass distribution of products via consignment auction liq-uiadation outlets, doctoral dissertation, University ofHouston, from wwwlib,umi.com
25 한경희. (1998). 어패럴 CAD 시스템의 효율적 활용 방안 연구. -의류산업의 애패럴 CAD 사용 실태를 중심으로-. 상명대 디자인 대학원 석사학위 논문. 52, 56
26 Clegg, S. T. & Johnson, A. (2000). Not just for men: A casestudy of the teaching and learning of information technology in higher education. Higher Educatioa, 40, 123-145
27 Shanley, L. A. & Kincade, D. H. (1991). Industry and Educa-tion: Parterships for Apparel and Textile Programs. Jour-nat of Home Economics, Summer, 12-15
28 채서일. (1998). 사회과학 조사방법론. 학현사
29 Kelley, D. S. (1998). Cooperative Learning as a teachingmethodology to develop computer aided Draftine prob-tern-solving skills, doctoral dissertation. Mississippi StateUniversity. 88-89